reply to post by whatukno
Do you know what the object is constructed of?
Perhaps it is not stone but something else?
I just point this out, because I find that the first people who jump to debunk this stuff, do it with out having actually put hands on the object
itself, and are merely using "conventional" wisdom, which is always highly suspect, since as I said, you do not have all the facts.
As far as the legends of Atlantis being a parable, this is true, but it is also a strong possibility that it is based on facts. A very strong, almost
definite possibility.
Why?
Because there is physical proof that the sumerians had contact with South America (confirmed cuneiform writing found on statuettes in ruins in South
America), the Egyptians as well (mummies with cocaine in their systems, which comes from cocoa leaves, which have never grown in North Africa).
All of these possibilities were considered bunk by mainstream archaeologists for years, but they now begrudgingly admit that it is probably a fact.
An archaeologist will not ever think outside the paradigm of their vaunted academic education because they have been brainwashed by the establishment
to think in a certain way (those that do, are chastised and ridiculed). This makes any conclusions they come to, suspect and open for debate in any
clear thinking individuals mind.
