Ron Paul - Racist and Psycho

Thats what I am talking about. Its things like this that just go to show how easily public opinion can be swayed with out any facts being brought fourth whatsoever. I am curious to know who all these Ron Paul haters think can save this country.

Ron Paul is the BEST MAN FOR THE JOB HANDS DOWN.

you shills can/and will say anything to try to drag a GOOD MAN down.

look...it goes like this

Obama..TERRORIST...elitist Puppet
Clinton...TERRORIST..elitist Puppet
gulianni..TERRORIST...elitist Puppet
McCain....TERRORIST..elitist Puppet

Ron Paul.. A Man for the People .. NOT A TERRORIST...

Well .. after doing some looking around, I did not find anything that gave any weight to the idea that he's a racist. However, I DID find some information that points to him being a reptilian and a secret helper of aliens to take over the planet.

reply to post by FlyersFan


LOL....Good find and heres a couple about Sherry Shriner.

www.exodus2006.com...
www.exodus2006.com...

I have never believed the "Ron Paul is a racist" line, he's publicly denounced racism pretty regularly. Also, nothing in his legislative record indicates any racist views. Last of all, the leader of the NAACP in Paul's district has personally defended Ron Paul against the idea that he's a racist. You'd think that if he was a racist, the NAACP wouldn't be defending him

The newsletter quotes were ghostwritten for Ron Paul's newsletter by a guy named Lew Rockwell, who, at the time they were written, advocated the idea that Libertarians should build a political alliance with traditionalist "paleoconservatives", and his writings should be seen in this context.

Anyway, Ron Paul has repeatedly repudiated the racist comments in public, and described them as "small minded thoughts."

Again, this is more of the kind of "guilt by association" SwiftBoating BS we are now seeing a lot of with Barack Obama.

There is nothing in either candidate's record to indicate either of them are "racist", but it makes a good political smear

Attacking Ron Paul and rehashing the newsletters edited by Lew Rockwell tells me that someone is very worried that Mr. McCain cannot possibly pull off the election in the States, and those same "someones" are worried to pieces that Ron Paul has decided to go for broke and run for President. Hmmmm...

reply to post by Pellevoisin


I think they want Hillary in there, McCain is just the GOP's political puppet, he has know chance and the GOP knows this. HIllarys the one to watch out for, she would do just about anything to get in there.

reply to post by CaptainIraq


Gold and silver are legal tender in the united states.You might need to research the definition of "legal tender"
The only problem with the gold standard is that the government has more debt than we have gold to back it.

Ron Paul is the best shot at getting us out of the hole the two party system has gotten us into.

The racist newsletters were debunked long ago which is why the media never used them against Ron Paul.

The newsletters weren't even written by Ron Paul, they were written by a man named Eric Dondero (real name: Eric Rittberg) who used to work for Ron Paul. After he wrote them, Ron Paul fired him and now Eric Dondero goes around trolling the internet making up BS about Ron Paul as revenge for him getting fired.

Here's Eric Dondero's blog profile:
www.blogger.com...

He mostly goes around blogs spreading lies and propadganda about Ron Paul in the comments of articles.

Here's a bio on Eric Dondero (written by himself):
www.shadowdemocracy.org...

reply to post by daddyroo45


More like a monarchy if you ask me.

But hey what do I know?

The elections of 2008 don't matter, it's time to clean house!

Originally posted by CaptainIraq
But seriously, people. The guy wants to make gold and silver LEGAL TENDER in the USA.

In case you failed middle school, let me refresh your memory, gold and silver are ALREADY legal tender in the USA and can be used.

If you mean Ron Paul's idea to back paper money with gold and silver like it was up until the 1950's, then I think it's a great idea because it would instantly solve the inflation problem and gas prices would go down to sub-$1 prices like they were 15 years ago.

Of course, the rich elite bankers don't want that to happen, since they make their money off inflation and oil.

reply to post by QuetzalcoatlAlien


reply to post by The Old American


It is appauling how the word "racism" has rapidly evolved into an epithet that systematically ensures individuals and specific groups are censored from debating and discussing important social and political matters that directly or indirectly address the issue of race in American society. Democratic societies have historically depended upon the free exchange of compeating ideas. When a democracy ceases to allow the public to discuss important matters without fear of repurcussions, that particular society has been deprived of an essential aspect of its freedom (i.e. the ability of citizens to collectively determine the shape of their society and its future development). I realize that the issue of race, is controversial, however, I additionally realize that few political decisions of historical significance have occurred that were devoid of an extremely controversial issue.

Since the mid-twentieth century, the American society has dramatically altered its traditional beliefs about the significance that race plays within society. While our national intelligensia and media have praised and lauded the changes, many Americans are beginning that the legacy of the American Civil Rights movement has progressed far beyond the acquisition of equal economic opportunities for American Blacks. The legislative legacy of the American Civil Rights movement is dispossing the majority of Americans who are European descent of their ability to control and determine the future of the nation that their ancestors established and built.

In the 1960s, Whites (Americans of European origin) accounted for approximately slightly less than 90% of the populace. However, after the Johnson Administration passed the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1964 to bring American immigration policy in conformity with the Civil Rights Act of 1964 thus abolishing the quota system that had been maintained by the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952 passed by the Eisenhower Administration nearly more than a decade earlier. This immigration policy of supporting non-European immigration from the Third World has resulted in millions of men and women who historically and culturally have no connection with either the United States or the traditions of Western Civilization to flood into our nation. Consequently, we shouldn't be suprised by the fact that White Americans are rapidly approaching a point where they will cease to be a demographic minority, and thus be dispossed of the ability to decide the future of the United States. It should be patently clear that growing amount of immigrants who are coming into the United States both legally and illegally are not adopting American culture and are forging their own cultural enclaves within the country.

White Americans have not mobolized en mass to politically combat the dispossession of their country by a growing myriad of non-Western ethnic groups, because they have been forced into a submissive state radical egalitarians (i.e. liberals) who use "racist" as an epithet to label heretical individuals due to the refussal to laud multiculturalism and diversity as cultural values (i.e. the ideological orthodoxy of cultural suicide) for merely insenuating that certain laws that are leading this great nation to disasterous consequences should be dramatically reformed and reconsidered.

While I do not support Ron Paul as a political candidate, I emphatically support his First Amendment right to disuss subjects that are ignorantly considered taboo by cultural philistines (i.e. liberals) and conservatives who have yet to free themselves of the shackles of political correctness. If you doubt that race is not an important issue, I beg you to listen to talk-radio; the amount of "double talk" that occurs in our society is astounding. The racial dimensions of contemporary problems are hidden underneath a complex lexicon of socially acceptable terms and words. I think that is high time that we had a open and honest discussion about race in the United States, I think that if the average person knew the depth of the discontent that many people have toward the current direction of American society it would absolutely 'blow their mind.'

In conclusion, who cares if Dr. Paul is a "rascist?" Dismissing someone's political views because they are brave enough to discuss race is absurd, irrational, and contrary to the cornerstone of democratic society - free speach. If he in fact has certain racialist views, he should be allowed to discuss those views openly, and let each member of the public decide for themselves whether they support or condemn those views on an individual basis.

P.S. - Martin Luther King Jr. was known a Marxist, an adulter, and an alcoholic. The fact that he has his own federal holiday is abhorrent. In a just society the public would have access to thousands of documents that are currently sealed by court order that demonstrate that MLK was not someone that your children should be instructed to emulate, that he was not a saintly person, and that if anything he was a wolf in sheeps clothing that should have been rightly (and in all likelyhood eventually will be) condemned to historical obscurity.

just another a-typical thread op, without any kind of common sense, so is this man left right-middle- or just does he have common sense in the game that upsets you,



no star'
no flag
just another body filling a void, without a clue

Everyone is talking about "facts" and how they shouldnt say anything unless it is known as a fact...

.....so was it this dondo guy or was it this rockwell guy? 2 different people claim that 2 other people, and not ron paul, wrote those things....so....they both cant be right...

wow...*crickets*...

i guess no paul supporter had an answer for that one.

reply to post by 12.21.12


Oh, give it a rest! He received a lousy $500 from someone, who he LATER learned was a white supremacist. He said that no he would not be returning the money--that he would put it to better use than the white supremacist. In other words, he dissed the white supremacist....

There is way way more facts and evidence that shows Obama as the racist, with his appointments, his affiliations, his actions, Holder's actions, who he supports, who supports him.