It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Creationists Will Destroy ATS

page: 31
43
<< 28  29  30    32 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 27 2008 @ 10:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by atlasastro
Has it happened yet, has ATS been destroyed.

Have the creationist
destroyed ATS yet.:bash: I guess all the creationist bashing saved ATS from certain doom.
Damn, were else can the creationist go to do this....:bnghd:.


In context: this thread was created not long before stricter forum rules were put into effect in the origins forum. They were needed as much of what was being posted was not conspiracy related.




posted on Sep, 6 2008 @ 11:30 PM
link   
bored with ats, really people are tired of going over n over stuff & they become social, like who cares, & yes anything imprtant is blocked by comedian heretics, put it together! make sense, I don't wanna read 100 posts of intelect,. it's just another gov program to supress technology bec US is so poor & they'll have 2b sold 2 prostitution 2 pay debt,. haha anom post strikes again!

worship me & call me GOD



posted on Sep, 7 2008 @ 04:23 AM
link   
Failed attempt to see Anonymous post.

Sorry.

[edit on 7-9-2008 by Astyanax]



posted on Sep, 7 2008 @ 09:55 AM
link   
" creationist will destroy ATS "

L.....................O..........................L


hahahahah, this was the funniest thing I read all morning, thanks for the laugh.



posted on Sep, 7 2008 @ 08:41 PM
link   
JesusisTruth. so how long ago do you believe the universe and our planet was made? what do you base this belief on?


[edit on 7-9-2008 by riley]



posted on Sep, 8 2008 @ 12:59 AM
link   
reply to post by riley
 


JesusisTruth. so how long ago do you believe the universe and our planet was made? what do you base this belief on?

And also:

JesusisTruth. so how long ago do you believe this thread was made? what do you base this belief on?



posted on Sep, 8 2008 @ 01:05 PM
link   
I don't know when the thread was made. I didn't check the dating.



Riley I don't know when the universe was made. I know that outside of earths rotation time doesn't exist, so what was 100s of years ago was as is now in space.

But truly God is amazing, I know it's hard to believe but I do. That is something I will find out when I'm dead. I always wonder many things about God and truly I know nothing.

The only thing I know for certain is that goodness and jutice are real and that this force implanted it in us as I call him God.

and so I take comfort that one day only good will exist and nomore evil and I can't wait to see this day.


peace.



posted on Sep, 9 2008 @ 05:23 AM
link   
reply to post by JesusisTruth
 


I don't know when the thread was made. I didn't check the dating.

You should have. You would then have realized that the thread is very old, and refers to a situation on ATS which was serious enough at the time to cause the site administrators to take action in order to rectify it.

You're late to the party and you've missed all the action, but I'm glad you had a laugh anyway.

By the way, have you communicated your insight that time not exist outside 'the circle of the earth' to the physics or cosmology communities? If your proof is rigorous enough, there may be a Nobel in it for you.



posted on Sep, 9 2008 @ 05:58 AM
link   
I don't have proof about earths rotation and time.

as for being late, lol. I was the (Truth) along time ago in about early 2002. I've been here forever.

I don't remember the thing with the administrators.



posted on Dec, 1 2008 @ 08:10 PM
link   
The entire concept of this threads is complete nonsense.
There is not a conspiracy brought on by creationists to destroy ATS.
What I do see here is an attempt to try to silence creationists because the op is offended by what he either cannot understand or is not willing to understand.

Instead of creating a thread that is constructive, the op opens a thread as a bait tactic to try to get creationists to react so he can say I told you so.
Well, I am a Christian who wholeheartedly believes God created everything, except the thoughts of mankind.

Just as we are free to express our points of view in the USA, members on ATS are also free to express and share their points of view.
The paranoia the op is displaying is only a tactic to try to silence and stop creationists from sharing what they believe.

In my experience so far I have experienced evolutionists ganging up on creationist.
So what if creationists agree with one another.
The evolutionists do the same thing.
Supporting another's post is not a threat to the existence of ATS.

Threads like this should be allowed just as creationists threads should be allowed.
And, ANYONE should be allowed free speech and not be censored just because someone disagrees with them.

For the op to accuse creationists for the supposed down spiral of thread content is just plain slander, libel, and lies.
I don't see where the op is coming from at all.
I see rich content in every thread I've viewed and participated in.

If the op can't handle the heat maybe he should not come here and participate.
From what I've seen, ATS is set up to invite beliefs and opinions of all people.

I myself simply join in on the conversations, and I try my best to not posts posts that may appear to be attacks.
But this thread in itself was an out and out attack on creationists accusing us of things we are not guilty of doing.

I will pray for everyone in here, and I hope that the lies will stop.
In any case, I forgive the op and those who agree with him.
Hopefully the op will see the light from those he hates so much.
Maybe the op will stop mingling false ATS history with ATS historical fact.
The op should not even be bringing the owners of this site into his own grudges for those he does not like to hear.

I believe we all have the right to express ourselves and what we believe.
To ask anyone to shut up, or even to try to censor them, is the wrong way to handle a discussion.
If you don't agree with them, then fine, but don't get all mad and try to get them banned or try to have their threads removed.
Be civil.
Be creative.
Be understanding, but you don't have to agree with them.
Be clever.
Let others express themselves.

And, don't worry op, because you will get your wish one day, when the antichrist rules the world.
At that time, not only will creationists and Christians be shut up, but we will be killed for trusting in Jesus.
Until that time just try to deal with us with civility and not hostility.

[edit on 12/1/2008 by SaintlyMic]



posted on Dec, 1 2008 @ 08:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by SaintlyMic
And, don't worry op, because you will get your wish one day, when the antichrist rules the world.
At that time, not only will creationists and Christians be shut up, but we will be killed for trusting in Jesus.
Until that time just try to deal with us with civility and not hostility.

I love how you began your post accusing the OP of baiting creationists.. you then finnish your post alligning "evolutionists" with the anti-christ (and killers..?) and now in the very next sentence you make an appeal for everyone to be civil and not hostile.




[edit on 1-12-2008 by riley]



posted on Dec, 1 2008 @ 08:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by riley

Originally posted by SaintlyMic
And, don't worry op, because you will get your wish one day, when the antichrist rules the world.
At that time, not only will creationists and Christians be shut up, but we will be killed for trusting in Jesus.
Until that time just try to deal with us with civility and not hostility.

I love how you began your post accusing the OP of baiting creationists.. you then finnish your post alligning "evolutionists" with the anti-christ (and killers..?) and now in the very next sentence you make an appeal for everyone to be civil and not hostile.


The op did everything I stated.
I said nothing to the contrary.
I never said evolutionists were aligned with the antichrist.
You said that.
I said that the op does not have to worry about having us shut up, because the antichrist will shut us up.

My post is right on topic.
Yours is not.



posted on Dec, 1 2008 @ 09:04 PM
link   
Not on topic? I don't see how it isn't.

..oh I see you are indirectly quoting T&C at me. subtle.
The OP wasn't being dishonest as there WAS indeed some problems with (a couple of) creationists causing trouble (ganging up, abusing, posting porn in profiles and posting (non conspiracy) creationist propoganda etc) but they were either banned or started followng the rules.. admin clamped down on them.


I am wondering why you bothered bumping this thread just to have a go at the OP though.. we've just tried to let sleeping dogs lie.

Which is what I will try do again.. here's to this thread getting buried again.

[edit on 1-12-2008 by riley]



posted on Dec, 1 2008 @ 09:10 PM
link   
Oh boy. My favorite thread ever was bumped.


Originally posted by SaintlyMic
the op opens a thread as a bait tactic to try to get creationists to react so he can say I told you so.


You're smarter than me. It took me until like page 10 or 15 (something insane like that) to figure it out.

OK.

*Breathes in. Breathes out. Counts to ten. Zens. Walks away.*



posted on Dec, 1 2008 @ 09:14 PM
link   
SaintlyMic was the one that bumped it.. :shk:



posted on Dec, 1 2008 @ 09:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by riley
Not on topic? I don't see how it isn't.

..oh I see you are indirectly quoting T&C at me. subtle.
The OP wasn't being dishonest as there WAS indeed some problems with (a couple of) creationists causing trouble (ganging up, abusing posting porn in profiles etc) but they were either banned or started followng the rules.. admin clamped down on them.


I am wondering why you bothered bumping this thread just to have a go at the OP though.. we've just tried to let sleeping dogs lie.


I'm not bumping this thread.
The op should not have accused the creationists of the things he accused us of doing.
I found this thread because ATS is advertising it in the off-Topic area.

The op was completely coming against the creationists and blaming the creationists for the so called problems in ATS.
The op didn't just blame a couple of creationists either.
The op said that there was a whole group of creationists out to destroy ATS.

A couple of creationists is NOT a problem.
But the op was addressing all or at least most of the creationists.
His notion that it was the creationists fault for the supposed destruction of ATS was clearly apparent.
Not only that, but the op stated that the creationists have been the reason for the calamities of ATS.
The apparent warnings and concerns of the op were apparently not even an issue.

ok.
Fair.
Now, show me who exactly was posting porn.
Show me who was ganging up on evolutionists.

Just because someone claims they are a creationist does not mean they are.
Anyone can pose as a creationist and then put up porn to try to discredit the creationists.
Prove to me that the creationists have been the problem on ATS.
Otherwise your claims are null and void.

And, it appears to me that the op's idea that the creationists would destroy this site has proven to be a lie.
ATS is still here and so are the creationists.

Also, if you, or them, or even ATS was going to let "sleeping dogs lie" why would this thread still be allowed to remain active?
By ATS leaving this thread active, and then advertising it as well, they are NOT letting a sleeping dog lie.

[edit on 12/1/2008 by SaintlyMic]



posted on Dec, 1 2008 @ 09:54 PM
link   
You have NO right to demand proof of what I and others were subjected to.. especially months after the fact.

If you really want to know the specifics of who got banned and why.. ask admin.



posted on Dec, 1 2008 @ 10:02 PM
link   
reply to post by SaintlyMic
 


I can't mention any other names since they never wanted anyone else to know but I was one of the members who was banned, Mic. This thread was a very painful experience for me (not to be melodramatic or overly sensitive- just being honest). I never really did feel the same way about ATS after this. I still love it here- no doubt. It's just not the same. It's just one of those incidences you try to forget or else the bad feelings will eat away at you.



posted on Dec, 1 2008 @ 10:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by AshleyD
reply to post by SaintlyMic
 


I can't mention any other names since they never wanted anyone else to know but I was one of the members who was banned, Mic. This thread was a very painful experience for me (not to be melodramatic or overly sensitive- just being honest). I never really did feel the same way about ATS after this. I still love it here- no doubt. It's just not the same. It's just one of those incidences you try to forget or else the bad feelings will eat away at you.


Please do not feel bad or sad.
I would not like anyone to feel that way.

This thread is still an attack using generalities, and this is clearly evident.
I just hope things are better now.

It seems to me, from my experiences thus far, that I see great things to discuss on ATS.
But, I have been pounced upon by all kinds of people just because they think I am hateful because I will not accept nor believe what THEY say I should believe.
A great example of this tactic is represented by what the op has said.

I do not agree with the approach of this thread because it accuses a whole group of people.
The op leads you through a history of ATS then slaps you in the face with false accusations.
I honestly have not seen one Christian do what the op proposes.
In fact, a TRUE Christian would NEVER do as the op proposes.
I know, because I am a Christian myself, and I would never tell someone they need to be silenced just because I disagree with them.

I believe EVERYONE has the right to share their side of a discussion.
No one has the right to censor what they disagree with, unless it can cause a child to grow up in confusion, and THAT is where I draw the line.
But, what we have here, hopefully, are adults sharing what they believe is the TRUTH.



posted on Dec, 2 2008 @ 02:13 AM
link   
reply to post by riley
 


I am wondering why you bothered bumping this thread just to have a go at the OP though.. we've just tried to let sleeping dogs lie.

I believe I can answer that.

I made a post supporting his position on this thread. He got curious about this support from a declared non-Christian, went looking to find out more about me, found this thread and felt he just had to express his feelings about it.

Am I right, SaintlyMic?

[edit on 2-12-2008 by Astyanax]



new topics

top topics



 
43
<< 28  29  30    32 >>

log in

join