It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dragonfire2159
Personally I am for gay marriage. I don't see anything wrong with two men/women getting together. If they're in love, I don't see anything wrong with it.
Originally posted by Chongun
okay look,
Sodom and Ammorah - search google
And see for you're self.
[edit on 30-5-2008 by Chongun]
Originally posted by manticore
As a libertarian, if something doesn't bother me, it's okay with me. Why couldn't blacks and women vote in the past? Those proposing the ban had their arguments, but in the end, they were allowed to.
If a woman or man, loves a woman or man, let them get married. As a married heterosexual male, I don't like to see people making out in front of me, whether their heterosexual or homosexual.
How about people who want to be polygamists and can afford multiple wifes and children? How about people who are in love with their pets and want to marry them? Once you open this box, it becomes a Pandora's Box. It's certainly a complicated issue, though.
Originally posted by LaBella
Are you freaking serious? Have you noticed that no one is paying attention to you anymore? I think you have taken it too far. Referring to people as "retards" and "dipsh-ts" now thats a little overboard. This was meant to be a discussion, not a slamfest.
reply to post by pak88
Originally posted by dragonfire2159
reply to post by pak88
Even though I see this comparisson as apples to oranges, I'll state a main flaw in the argument. There is no way to show definitive consent between a man and an animal, because we don't understand what animals are communicating, obviously. I still don't see any justification for dictating how someone else should live their life, just because it is not a personal preference. There is no negative to same-sex marriage, except in that it brings out prejudice in those who are opposed. So, once again, I'll ask. Is there an objective reason as to why you oppose same-sex marriage, which isn't based on a preference? For example what is the effect that same-sex marriage will have on society, that you are not in favor of?
Originally posted by dragonfire2159
reply to post by Perplexed
There is nothing sick or twisted about any of that. Also, bondage, sadomasachism, etc. are not owned by the gay community. All individuals of all backgrounds practice these stimultations. Here's an article for you to read.
www.thesmokinggun.com...
Originally posted by JonInMichigan
We know that all through history there have been a ton of gays. That's a fact. But did any of them marry? Has marraige ever been something that gays did? Why not? Was it necessary back then?
If two men lived together and everyone in the village sorta kinda knew they were "best buddies"...(Holmes and Watson anyone? Bert and Ernie perhaps?) and one died, did the State gov come in and kick the non- property owning partner out and take the property as a state possession? (it acctually happens ever day now - one has to sue to stop it) and that's what some gay couples have been dealing with over theyears. But did the state do that way back then, thus necessatating a legal gay marraige?
Peace,
Jon
[edit on 30-5-2008 by JonInMichigan]
[edit on 30-5-2008 by JonInMichigan]
Originally posted by dragonfire2159
reply to post by Perplexed
Please provide only reasons based on objective analysis, not a preference, and refrain from the idiotic it's "wrong", "not normal", "disgusting" arguments, unless you can provide an objective reason.