Source: www.globalsecurity.org...
An interesting read indeed. Typical spin politics during a campaign year. Funny how the dems are not yelling about GW's "proof" of service in the
70s.
BTW, I am a registered Republican who is disillusioned with both parties at this point.
|
 Originally posted by titian
Source: www.globalsecurity.org...
An interesting read indeed. Typical spin politics during a campaign year. Funny how the dems are not yelling about GW's "proof" of service in the
70s.
BTW, I am a registered Republican who is disillusioned with both parties at this point. 
You are not alone, my friend. 
|
Unfortunately Kerry is not without his faults. He killed an investigation into Vietnam War POWs in the 80s. That move from a veteran from the same
war? I'm afraid that no matter who wins the election, middle class people like us will not be among the winners.
|
Kerry is really no different than Bush, other than he actually went to Vietnam and took it like a man. He obviously came home and sold out, tho. He's
just as bought.
My main concern is getting rid of the Neo Cons. They are making a ruin of the United States and the world in general. 
|
well, that article has some spin to it. In 1992, in a post cold war world, I would think it would be a good move to cut ICBMs also, but not during the
cold war. Just like this comanche system, (which started out in 1983 i think) just cut was a good idea [to cut] for todays world. Yet, Kerry voted
against Reagan's SDI and B1's (imho, that wasn't wise during the cold war). And, did I read that article right, Kerry voted against Patriots,
Apaches, cruise missiles...used in Iraq/Afghanistan.
It's probably better to look at who cut what and when, rather than have that writer tell you what he thinks should have been cut.
[Edited on 2-3-2004 by Bob88]
|
