This topic is in the Space Exploration discussion forum.  (rss)


significant H2O seepage/flow in heimdall crater




Topic started on 28-5-2008 @ 09:20 PM by reject


I read somewhere that one of the mission objectives is to see if subsurface ice ever turns liquid at the martian north pole?

Are they kidding? I can clearly see significant water seepage/flow on the right side of heimdall crater. Its right there on the surface. Its soaking wet. I see it even without manipulating chromaticity. What gives?



high resolution



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 28-5-2008 @ 10:45 PM by disownedsky


reply to post by reject



Wait a goshdarned minute - that looks an AWFUL lot like this. Are we possibly a little confused here?

[edit on 28-5-2008 by disownedsky]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 28-5-2008 @ 10:51 PM by SystemiK


Nice catch disowned. It sure does look similar. The inset pic in the op is not identical to yours, but I'd be comfortable calling it the same object.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-5-2008 @ 12:21 AM by reject



Originally posted by disownedsky
reply to post by reject



Wait a goshdarned minute - that looks an AWFUL lot like this. Are we possibly a little confused here?

[edit on 28-5-2008 by disownedsky]
I am confused how again?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-5-2008 @ 05:20 AM by disownedsky


My point is that the object in the crater may not be in the crater. Look at at the NASA file name.




..............................................................................
[edit: removed unnecessary quote of entire previous post]
Quoting - Please review this link

[edit on 29-5-2008 by 12m8keall2c]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-5-2008 @ 06:06 AM by reject



Originally posted by disownedsky


My point is that the object in the crater may not be in the crater. Look at at the NASA file name.




..............................................................................
[edit: removed unnecessary quote of entire previous post]
Quoting - Please review this link

[edit on 29-5-2008 by 12m8keall2c]
If you mean the phoenix lander, No. It was still on its way down in the picture

Phoenix appears to be parachuting into a giant crater, but it's only an optical illusion - the lander was actually 20 km in front of the crater when the image was taken (Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona)
new scientist



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-5-2008 @ 07:36 AM by nablator


Soaking wet... not obvious. Maybe it was, a long time ago, and we see million year old mineral deposits.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-5-2008 @ 11:32 AM by disownedsky


reply to post by reject



That is exactly what I mean, and I have since confirmed that this is the Phoenix lander descending with the crater in the far background. It's just a perceptual illusion that it's on the crater wall.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-5-2008 @ 11:56 AM by pieman


i would think your referencing the dark areas on the walls of the crater?

to me the soil at the top of the crater looks darker than the soil of the walls, it's possible that the soil slipping down the walls made this mark, or it might be glass from the impact of whatever caused the crater in the first place although more than anything else, your right, it does look wet. i'ld imagine thats the reason nasa picked this area to land.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-5-2008 @ 03:03 PM by Shadow_Lord


I don't think the OP was talking about the craft at all, since he focuses on the right side of the crater.

But, just because the ground is a different color, does not mean liquid water is present. Water..if present..(I hope it is) would be below the surface, liquid water cannot exist on the surface of Mars.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-5-2008 @ 03:12 PM by Lantian


Isn't it far to Cold for water to be liquid on the surface? Water freezes at 32 Degrees F.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:
































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.094 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread