 |
|
Topic started on 28-5-2008 @ 09:20 PM by reject
|
I read somewhere that one of the mission objectives is to see if subsurface ice ever turns liquid at the martian north pole?
Are they kidding? I can clearly see significant water seepage/flow on the right side of heimdall crater. Its right there on the surface. Its
soaking wet. I see it even without manipulating chromaticity. What gives?
high resolution
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-5-2008 @ 10:45 PM by disownedsky
|
reply to post by reject
Wait a goshdarned minute - that looks an AWFUL lot like this. Are we possibly a little
confused here?
[edit on 28-5-2008 by disownedsky]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-5-2008 @ 10:51 PM by SystemiK
|
Nice catch disowned. It sure does look similar. The inset pic in the op is not identical to yours, but I'd be comfortable calling it the same
object.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-5-2008 @ 12:21 AM by reject
|
Originally posted by disownedsky
reply to post by reject
Wait a goshdarned minute - that looks an AWFUL lot like this. Are we possibly a little
confused here?
[edit on 28-5-2008 by disownedsky]  I am confused how again?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-5-2008 @ 05:20 AM by disownedsky
|
My point is that the object in the crater may not be in the crater. Look at at the NASA file name.
..............................................................................
[edit: removed unnecessary quote of entire previous post]
Quoting - Please review this link
[edit on 29-5-2008 by 12m8keall2c]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-5-2008 @ 06:06 AM by reject
|
Originally posted by disownedsky
My point is that the object in the crater may not be in the crater. Look at at the NASA file name.
..............................................................................
[edit: removed unnecessary quote of entire previous post]
Quoting - Please review this link
[edit on 29-5-2008 by 12m8keall2c]  If you mean the phoenix lander, No. It was still on its way down in the picture  Phoenix appears to be
parachuting into a giant crater, but it's only an optical illusion - the lander was actually 20 km in front of the crater when the image was taken
(Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of
Arizona) new scientist
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-5-2008 @ 07:36 AM by nablator
|
Soaking wet... not obvious. Maybe it was, a long time ago, and we see million year old mineral deposits.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-5-2008 @ 11:32 AM by disownedsky
|
reply to post by reject
That is exactly what I mean, and I have since confirmed that this is the Phoenix lander descending with the crater in the far background. It's just
a perceptual illusion that it's on the crater wall.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-5-2008 @ 11:56 AM by pieman
|
i would think your referencing the dark areas on the walls of the crater?
to me the soil at the top of the crater looks darker than the soil of the walls, it's possible that the soil slipping down the walls made this mark,
or it might be glass from the impact of whatever caused the crater in the first place although more than anything else, your right, it does look wet.
i'ld imagine thats the reason nasa picked this area to land.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-5-2008 @ 03:03 PM by Shadow_Lord
|
I don't think the OP was talking about the craft at all, since he focuses on the right side of the crater.
But, just because the ground is a different color, does not mean liquid water is present. Water..if present..(I hope it is) would be below the
surface, liquid water cannot exist on the surface of Mars.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-5-2008 @ 03:12 PM by Lantian
|
Isn't it far to Cold for water to be liquid on the surface? Water freezes at 32 Degrees F.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |