Video that purportedly shows a living, breathing space alien to be shown Friday in Denver... , page 7
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 116 times


reply posted on 29-5-2008 @ 04:21 PM by tpeele
reply to post by AllSeeingI



I think that they will be taken away by guys in black suits some time today or early tomorrow.



reply posted on 29-5-2008 @ 04:41 PM by dgtempe
reply to post by IMAdamnALIEN

I saw FAUX having fun with this, and they had caricatures of their own version of aliens (not funny) also.

Evryone wants disclosure, but no one is willing to beleive anyone. This is going to be hard. IMO, disclosure will never happen because we wont let it.


reply posted on 29-5-2008 @ 04:57 PM by Illusionsaregrander
reply to post by dgtempe



Oh there is plenty of disclosure going on. Close Encounters of the #2 kind.

I dont think anyone skeptical on this particular thread is being unfair. His past IS important to determining his credibility. It IS relevant to ask why he would be willing to wait so long to share footage that could be immensely important. It IS a shame that liars, hoaxers, and the incredibly gullible make all people interested in UFO's and ET look like crazies.

One thing I find very uplifting is the mood on this thread. Hopeful, but not falling all over ourselves grasping at CG straws to believe. The skepticism is very well founded, and the odds are really bad that this is the real deal, BUT, like every one else, I am open to the possibility that it may be something significant, and I am withholding my final judgment til I see the video. Or pieces of it, I think I am too skeptical at this point to pay to view, the odds are really not worth paying for in my humble opinion, and I hate to support hoaxers. Someone will leak enough to give us enough to play with.


reply posted on 29-5-2008 @ 05:15 PM by IMAdamnALIEN
reply to post by dgtempe



Heres the thing....

You have one side of the fence saying UFO's aren't real....The other saying strongly they are....The people on the fence are keeping an open mind, not trusting either side completely....

So where do you stand?

Disclosure wouldn't be disclosure if the government tells us what is "truth"

Only words from an alien species would be considered a form of truth, but even then, people(including myself) wouldn't believe, because, even at that level it could still be an illusion to further degrade our feeble minds............

Its a really complex issue



Edit to say:
I strongly believe in aliens!

[edit on 29-5-2008 by IMAdamnALIEN]



reply posted on 29-5-2008 @ 05:21 PM by garyo1954
reply to post by Illusionsaregrander



I would like to think we will get some glimpse of this video. I would hope Stan and Jeff would see the benefit of releasing something to the public.

As to the Draft Ballot Initiative To Create an Extraterrestrial Affairs Commission being weighed by Denver City Council, I'll say I'm not as hopeful as I was before I read it.

What the Council has to decide to place this issue on the ballot is if:



1. The presence of extraterrestrial beings and extraterrestrial vehicles on Earth, and within Earth’s atmosphere, has been confirmed by credible evidence;

2. Much of this evidence has been known by United States presidents as early as President Roosevelt and as recently as President Clinton and both Presidents Bush;

3. Since at least 1947, the United States government has denied knowledge of this evidence thus placing the public and local governments at risk and a disadvantage;

4. The United States government has suppressed and withheld from the public, evidence of advanced clean energy and transportation technologies of extraterrestrial origin that could prevent pollution and reduce use of fossil fuels;

5. The lack of public awareness about this evidence prevents responsible evaluation of potential risks and benefits for safety, health, education, and cultural and economic development, for Denver residents in relation to potential interactions with extraterrestrial beings;

6. Denver’s emergency health and public safety personnel and the general public are not informed enough to distinguish between potentially helpful and harmful extraterrestrial beings and are unprepared for contact or interactions with them;

7. There is enough credible evidence available, independent of the United States government, to adequately inform Denver residents and local government about extraterrestrial affairs; and

8. The creation of an Extraterrestrial Affairs Commission will provide a needed level of information about extraterrestrial affairs to government personnel, residents and visitors in the City and County of Denver.



Denver City Council is being asked to say all this is true. And if they find it true, then they will place this question before the voters:



“Shall the voters for the City and County of Denver adopt an Initiated Ordinance to require the creation of an extraterrestrial affairs commission to help ensure health, safety, education, and cultural and economic development for Denver residents in relation to potential interactions with extraterrestrial beings, and fund such commission from grants, gifts and donations, and from not more than seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) annually from the City and County of Denver? Yes___ No___



As you can see, the Council could reject the proposal for any of the above reasons, without invalidating the video. It is also possible that various Council members will make comments based on the video.

But all this leaves me wondering if Jeff Peckman might be willing to revise this proposal if it fails.


reply posted on 29-5-2008 @ 05:46 PM by garyo1954
reply to post by Terrapop



Yep. I read both those statements several times. And here's the problem I have with this private showing/no public viewing.

How are the council members going to rely on this video if it has not be viewed and verified by scientist prior to their seeing it?

That is just another reason for Council to defeat this entire proposal, don't you think?

I can see a member saying, "Mr. Peckman the video is very impressive, but so far the scientist haven't verified it, so why should we accept it?"

Make sense?
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^