I think people who don't believe Paul was replaced should do more research. It isn't possible for someone's face to change that much & still be the
same person. Obviously, he didn't have an extensive series of surgeries to reconstruct his face. He didn't have palate inserts. He didn't wear head
gear to change the curve of his mandibles.
Information on biometrics:
Biometrics refers to methods for uniquely recognizing humans based upon one or more intrinsic physical or behavioral traits. In information
technology, in particular, biometrics is used as a form of identity access management and access control. It is also used to identify individuals in
groups that are under surveillance.
Biometric characteristics can be divided in two main classes: Physiological are related to the shape of the body. Examples include, but are not
limited to fingerprint, face recognition, DNA, hand and palm geometry, iris recognition, which has largely replaced retina, and odor/scent.
Behavioral are related to the behavior of a person. Examples include, but are not limited to typing rhythm, gait, and voice. Some researchers[1] have
coined the term behaviometrics for this class of biometrics. Strictly speaking, voice is also a physiological trait because every person has a
different vocal tract, but voice recognition is mainly based on the study of the way a person speaks, commonly classified as behavioral.
en.wikipedia.org...
Paul McCartney is really dead
/ngp29e (tinyurl.com / ngp29e)
This is confirmed by an investigation of "Wired"
It 'one of the best known legends of rock: Paul McCartney died in 1966 and what we know today is merely a double that has changed. A legend who just
now seemed to have been dismantled and forgotten. But now two scientists have conducted an investigation for "Wired": The objective was to
demonstrate that everything was false but the results were rather surprising ...
The object of the dispute is the "PID", or the legend "Paul Is Dead". Dedicarcisi A were two experts, the computer Francesco Gavazzeni legal and
medical Carlesi Gabriella. The objective was to demonstrate that all these entries were false and unfounded, urban legends, in fact, throw a meal in
the media and fans. The studies conducted by two experts however have led to quite unexpected results.
The story in brief: Paul McCartney, the original is in fact died in a car accident in 1966, a crash occurred on board of his Austin Martin after a
quarrel with other members of the band. From that time to replace him there would be a double. Would have been the Beatles themselves to disseminate
texts confirm this in the coming years more or less messages subliminal by allusive covers such as "Abbey Road", a message engraved on a disk on the
contrary.
Gavazzeni Carlesi and were based on anthropometric and craniometrica, comparing, through images of repertoire, shape of the skull, teeth, etc.. in the
before and after 1966. And, since these tests, however, we can express only in terms of compatibility and non-certainty, the results still give a
negative result: that is, the person known as Paul McCartney before 1966 would not be the same that we see in the photos taken after that date. Case
reopened?
Machine translation of:
Paul McCartney è morto davvero
www.tgcom.mediaset.it...
The people who are gullible are the ones who have fallen for the double. You seriously never wondered what happened to him?
A big part of the problem is that a lot of people are ignorant about how doubles are used.
Background information on doubles
plasticmacca.blogspot.com...
A political decoy (or other impersonator) is a person employed to impersonate a politician, in order to draw attention away from the real person
or to take risks on their behalf. This can also apply to military figures, or civilians impersonated for political/espionage purposes. The political
decoy is an individual who has strong physical resemblance to the person they are impersonating. This resemblance can be strengthened by plastic
surgery. Often, such decoys are trained to speak and behave like their 'target.'
"Political decoy," en.wikipedia.org...]
"Know the character ... you will have to be inside and out - their clothes, facial expressions, gait, gestures, personal habits, thoughts and
reactions."
- Manual on Personal Disguises, US Office of Strategic Services
Winston Churchill, George Washington and Franklin D. Roosevelt made use of a double. Most world leaders -- and the intelligence apparata
surrounding them -- consider doubles and decoys a part of their bag of tricks...
(The World; Will the Real Saddam Hussein Please Step Down, By TOM ZELLER, October 6, 2002 )(NYT) at
www.nytimes.com...
Info on ME Clifton James, Gen. Montgomery's official double:
en.wikipedia.org...
Some of the purposes of a double can be to:
- make public appearances (political decoys or celebrity impersonators)
- take over [for ex, in case of death] to exploit that person’s popularity and influence
- create an alibi or frame up (espionage/crime)
Here are some scenarios:
...The physical similarities of doubles allows intelligence agencies to place an individual in different places at the same time. One twin could
be involved in an illegal or clandestine operation, while the second twin could be in a different location among people who could provide an alibi. If
the first twin were identified by witnesses as having committed a crime, then s/he could be apprehended by authorities. When questioned, the first
twin would simply provide the names of witnesses who were with the other twin in a different location when the crime was committed. When authorities
interviewed those witnesses, and verified the story, the first twin would be released. Unless the authorities knew about the second twin, it would be
very difficult to charge the first twin with a crime. In a professional and carefully planned covert operation, no one would realize what had
happened, and both twins would walk away.
A similar covert operation could involve one of the twins, "C" (criminal), committing a crime while the second twin, "P" (Patsy - ex. Lee Harvey
Oswald), was in a different location and knew nothing about what was happening. Twin "C" would commit the crime in the presence of witnesses, but
twin "P" would be identified as the culprit and arrested. "P" would deny any involvement in the crime, but with numerous witnesses he would not be
believed. If the twin "P" were killed before having a chance to tell about his twin, then the truth might never be known...
John Armstrong, JFK 101: An excerpt from "Harvey & Lee: How the CIA Framed Oswald" at www.jfkresearch.com...
