AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

This topic is in the Other Current Events discussion forum.  (rss)


Naked photos of 12/13 year old girls in art gallery seized by police.


<<  10    11    12    13    14    15  >>



reply posted on 29-10-2008 @ 04:03 AM by Anonymous ATS





   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2008 @ 08:09 AM by Anonymous ATS





   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2008 @ 08:26 AM by jimmyx


Originally posted by leearco
It has been all over the news the last few days here in Vic.

If anyone else took naked pics of children they would go to jail. Parents approval or not. Why should it be any different for 'artists'?


if a mother takes naked pictures of her kids in a bathtub playing around in the suds, should she go to jail?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-11-2008 @ 08:44 AM by jimmyx


Originally posted by Misfit
Originally posted by metamagic
I find the constant obsession to equate sex and nudity in the US and other fundamentalist societies, like Saudi Arabia and Iran, quite irrational.


I find the constant need for nudity in art quite irrational.


yeah, stabbings, beheadings, gunshot wounds, cutting of flesh, CSI morgue shots, violent depictions of human bodies... these are much more exceptable, right??? i mean they are on T.V. every night for all our kids to watch, and in movies, and in video games...even in sports shots, they'll show an actual broken leg/arm on a young adult. yeahhhhhhh!!!! these are just fine for all of you holier-then-thou. WE LOVE TO SHOW OUR KIDS VIOLENT ACTS, IT'S THE AMERICAN WAY!!!! but hey!!! show a naked body??? now you are OUT OF LINE PAL, AND A PERVERT!!!!!

[edit on 2-11-2008 by jimmyx]



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 3-11-2008 @ 11:32 PM by intelgurl


From what I can tell about the artist's style, use of shadows, dim lighting, soft focus and grain; it seems to be art not porn.
I don't see this as exploitation of young girls - it is more likely an easy target for prudish politicians trying to make a name for themselves.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 4-11-2008 @ 01:17 AM by DoNotBelieveThem


[edit on 4-11-2008 by DoNotBelieveThem]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-11-2008 @ 12:26 AM by Anonymous ATS





   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 8-11-2008 @ 09:19 AM by Anonymous ATS





   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 14-11-2008 @ 02:30 AM by Anonymous ATS





   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 16-11-2008 @ 04:56 AM by Anonymous ATS





   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-12-2008 @ 03:10 PM by Anonymous ATS





   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 5-12-2008 @ 11:30 PM by bandaidctrl


reply to post by tezzajw



There is a very fine line when it comes to these types of issues in the art world.

On one extreme, censorship of any kind CANNOT be tolerated, because it is believed by many to hinder the creative process, which in turn diminishes any chance of some sort of artistic revolution to rise up.

On the other, one could ask "Where do we draw the line?", if they let this one get away with it, what's next? People photographing murder because to some it's an art form?

From an artist standpoint.... scratch that, I don't even know what these pictures are, for all I know, the police officer got offended because it showed both the boy and the girl taking a bath together. I've seen many a photo of friends and relatives in the bath with their siblings.

It's definitely a tough call, child-like innocence can only go so far before it crosses the line into perversion. I'd say no nudies unless you're over 18. With written consent.

Lemme see the pictures then I'll be able to make a more rounded call on it.

-JR

edit: typo's and such

[edit on 5-12-2008 by bandaidctrl]



   copyright & usage 


<<  10    11    12    13    14    15  >>
































































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.035 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.