It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Hollywood11
The existence of Chakras is scientifically proven and published in medical journals-
Conclusion
It is the opinion of the authors that the potential for the use of energy-based therapies in diabetes is great. At present, these therapies have few known side effects and many potential benefits. However, as with all unproved therapies, they should be approached with caution.
None of the previous apes you claim are related to humans had a clear open third eye area, they all had ape brow ridges, only humans have a clear smooth open theird eye cavity without brow ridges interfering with it's fundtioning.
Originally posted by Hollywood11
None of the previous apes you claim are related to humans had a clear open third eye area, they all had ape brow ridges, only humans have a clear smooth open theird eye cavity without brow ridges interfering with it's fundtioning.
What third eye cavity? The is no cavity in the forehead. And how do you know that non-human apes can't have a functioning forehead chakra? Where is the peer reviewed and current paper on apes and chakras?
And even if they don't that is no evidence that we did not evolve from ancient apes. If anything it means that the "chakra" was higher on the head, hell they probably didn't even need one.
Originally posted by Hollywood11
Sigh....
If you believe that humans share a common ancestor with monkeys, then the HIGHEST possible animal that ancestor could be is...hmmm....well, A MONKEY! If it's not a monkey, then it has to be something even LOWER than a monkey
[edit on 29-5-2008 by Hollywood11]