reply to post by MikeCobb
I agree that the heart of this arguement lies in finding funerals private, rather than public. I will always support our right to protest, even when I
don't agree with the protesters. However, protesting in the manner in question simply infringes on a family's ability to say goodbye to a loved one.
You don't see protests at weddings, because churches are private property, and the police can be called without question. Most grave sites are also
privately owned, but because of their "free-roam" nature, are often not viewed as such. It's the same principle as people being able to protest
across the street from an abortion clinic, but not infront of, or across the street from a church that holds gay weddings, but not inside of the
church.
As far as I'm concerned, banning protests at funerals is simply a clarification of the law, not an infringement on someone's rights. The only
problem being that, most cemeteries are small enough or open enough, that even a protest from across the street can have an impact on those who are
mourning (unlike an abortion clinic or a large church). I think the solution lies in the hands of the family members who are holding the funeral.
Perhaps choosing a more enclosed grave site, or simply choosing to have a funeral procession inside of a church with a short burial cerimony
afterward. You can't take away someone's right to protest. But I certianly think it a disturbance of the peace to do something like this in such a
solomn place. The idea is to be more clever than those who would wish your family harm, if not in the court room, than on your own.