It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Sparky63
Allisone; I know you think your explanation of your theories should stand on their own, but a demonstration would be much more convincing, especially for those of us who are new to this field. A large levitating block of stone would be an awesome demonstration of your theory.
Originally posted by Sparky63
I am having a difficult time grasping the fundamental difference between the magnetism produced by electromagnetic particles that is commonly referred to as gravity but does not produce a discernable magnetic field & the magnetism produced by a large number of elementary particles that does produce such a field.
Originally posted by Sparky63
If the earth is constantly being magnetized by the sun and as a result has a magnetic field, what keeps Venus from producing such a field?
Originally posted by Sparky63
What causes the leap from one type of magnetism, commonly called gravity, and the other type of magnetism that produces the familiar magnetic field?
What you explain is called "quantum entanglement". It's like a more efficient and smaller scale "wireless transmission" that works off of resonant particles, much like radios work of of resonant circuits.
Originally posted by Promecus
reply to post by ALLis0NE
Wow, flame on! The fact that you reply to my input with insults tells me that your own theory is weak and doesn't have a leg to stand on.
Originally posted by Promecus
And if you think I've repeated what others have posted in this thread, then shouldn't you stop and think that perhaps it is true?
Originally posted by Promecus
After reading your tyrant twisted gibberish I can tell that you really don't have the first clue as to what you're talking about. Where did you say you got your physics degree?
Originally posted by Promecus
And about the black hole: Of course THAT would fail. You're looking at volume.
Originally posted by Promecus
Did you not stop to think about how a magnet can defeat the pull of the Earth?
Originally posted by Promecus
How can I use a 1x1x1 inch magnet to pick up a bolt off of the table if Earth's (Mass = 5.9736x10 to the 24th KG) gravity is stronger? Gravity IS weak
Originally posted by Promecus
Now, take a look at the answer you supplied concerning the question about doing the experiment on the other side of the planet. If the other end dips down doesn't that tell you that the magnet is trying to point to the true pole? Considering that the surface of the earth is curved, the fact that it dips down towards the TRUE magnetic pole (through the curve of the Earth) tells me that the metal rod is acting on magnetism, not gravity.
Originally posted by Promecus
Ok, you say I didn't do a very good job of explaining what magnetism is. I'll try to phrase it a different way. Every atom has a small magnetic field around it due to the electrons travelling along their valence bands.
Originally posted by Promecus
In other words, it is a form of energy that is associated with electron flow.
Originally posted by Promecus
This is why we see magnetic lines of flux coming off of wires with an electrical current running through them.
Originally posted by Promecus
So, basically you could call it a field of energy.
Originally posted by Promecus
The reason why having all of the atoms aligned with each other is important is because their fields will have an additive effect, making the over all field stronger. (also see Law of induction: en.wikipedia.org...)
Originally posted by Promecus
So, your spunge/plastic cube scenario can go bye-bye because the only particle involved with magnetism is the electron. The field itself is not constructed out of particles.
Originally posted by Promecus
Now, back to gravity for just a moment. Did you really just say that "mass is electromagnetic"? As I just described above, DUH. All atoms have an electromagnetic field. However, not all mass reacts to an electromagnetic field. For example, can you pick up a stick with an electrical magnet? Nope, sure can't. But you can pick up a nail.
Originally posted by Promecus
As far as the 2d space thing is concerned I'm not going to bother trying to explain that one to you. It still confuses me when I try to figure it out, so I'm certain you wouldn't stand a chance when trying to fathom such a concept. Just take my word for it.
Originally posted by Promecus
All I can say about this is ROTFLMAO ! You don't have the first clue here. You think it works off of resonant particles! Wow, good luck with that.
Originally posted by Promecus
Good luck proving your little theory. You're going to need all the luck you can get.
Originally posted by ALLis0NE
-Do you know I am an electrical engineer?
Originally posted by Promecus
Good luck proving your little theory. You're going to need all the luck you can get.
Let me ask you something, if you knew how to levitate a 30 ton block with magnetism/electricity, how would you explain it with the current theory of gravity?
[edit on 17-7-2008 by ALLis0NE]
Originally posted by ken10
After reading this thread i got to thinking about heat affecting the magnetism of objects, And in the case of water and air then clearly hot water rises through cold water and similarly hot air rises through cold air.
So that coincides with your theory.
However surely if your theory is correct then if you were to dangle a piece of metal by a chain attached to some scales, Then if you were to heat the metal with a blowtorch.....So if your theory were correct would you not expect the metal to weigh less the hotter it got ?
Has anyone experimented with this as it sounds too easy to prove or disprove this theory.
Originally posted by ALLis0NE
Yes, water, when heated, it's molecules separate making less mass per square inch. Same with air, when heated, it's molecules separate making less mass per square inch. With metal, when heated, metal expands making less mass per square inch.
When you pump something full of electrons, it has a "negative static charge". When you remove the extra electrons, it has a "positive static charge". However, you can NEVER fully remove ALL the electrons from an object.
That means it will always have a "static attraction/repulsion" to the Earth, which is a giant statically charged object itself.
Originally posted by ALLis0NE
Yes, well, in a short while I figured I would just release 0ne actual method for levitating a 30 ton rock. Ok? Be back soon...
Einstein's General Relativity requires a finite spherical universe (it cannot be infinite because of Mach's Principle, with which Einstein strongly agreed, that the mass of a body is finite, is determined by all other matter in the universe, thus all other matter in universe must be finite).
Two problems;
a) What surrounds this finite spherical universe? (Einstein used his spherical ellipsoidal geometry of General Relativity to propose curved space - if you travel in any one direction you will curve around and eventually return to your starting point - subtle, clever, weird, wrong).
b) What stops finite spherical universe gravitationally collapsing (thus Einstein's Cosmological / Antigravity Constant).
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by Promecus
From where i stand, the OP has presented loads of information supporting his theory. You have presented mostly shallow insistance with little information.
Originally posted by Promecus
[edit on 17-7-2008 by Promecus]
fixing typos. Hey, I'm a tech not an English major...
Originally posted by Promecus
Here is what I believe this experiment is really doing. The magnet is pointing towards true north, through the Earth. There is a reason why a compass needle is on a leveling pin.
A picture is worth 1K words.
Case closed. (haw!)