To a point I understand and agree with this and have always felt this to be so, but the problem I have is with non metalic items. This experiment would for instance not work with a wood or plastic ruler.

I strongly believe that we could 'defy gravity' in a craft using magentism and many anti gravity devices have used strong magnetism, but alot of what we call gravity I feel is due to the sheer wieght of our atmosphere holding us down.

Originally posted by ALLis0NE


The only reason this experiment would not work with wood or plastic, is because 1, the Earths magnetic field is dominating the magnetic domains of the atoms of the wood and plastic. And 2, the atomic structure of wood and plastic does not easily allow for their atoms to be magnetically aligned, so they are not easy effected by a smaller magnet. However, IT IS POSSIBLE.

So, then why doesn't the wood fly off into the atmosphere? If all gravity is magnetism, how are non magnetic objects staying put on the earth? Why don't my feet stick to the floor, or get heavier, when I wear steel capped boots?

As to your original experiment, haven't you just made a compass?

Originally posted by fingapointa
Well duh, of course my feet will be heavier with boots on, but no heavier than the mass of the boot and my foot, what's your big secret on gravity?

Mass=Magnetic Attraction

When something has more MASS it has more "electrons and protons and neutrons". All three things are "electromagnetic".

That is the secret of gravity, it's just magnetic force.

Originally posted by fingapointa
Does it effect the weight or does it effect the bodies motion? Has the weight of the object changed? Have you shown differences in weight, both pre and post magnetism?

Yes the weight changes but I don't have a sensitive enough scale to measure that. Actually you don't need a scale, you can physically see the weight shift on the wire. How can it be "balanced" and then "not balanced"? Only answer = weight. Also, it does effect the motion that is why it is constantly being lifted up on the South end, and constantly pulled down on the North end in the North hemisphere..

PLEASE FORGET EVERYTHING YOU EVER LEARNED ABOUT GRAVITY BENDING TIME AND SPACE, IT IS COMPLETLY WRONG.

Originally posted by fingapointa
How do you propose to create the opposite counter reacting magnetic field, to not only overcome inertia, but also to provide lift?

You do not make an anti-gravity device with an external "field" like a magnet has a magnetic field. You make an anti-gravity device by changing a heavy objects atomic magnetic alignment with Earth. Naturally all object's atomic magnetic domain is dominated by Earths gravity. We simply need to flip the poles of the atoms of an object.

For another anti-gravity experiment:

I can use a baseball bat to flip the magnetic domains of the atoms inside of a baseball, so that it repels from Earth.

Just like magnetising a nail with a hammer, you can magnetise a baseball with a baseball bat, and make it repel from Earth.

Originally posted by fingapointa
What magnetic force are you going to repel against, once you reach the edge of the earth's magnetic field?

When you reach the edge of Earth's magnetic field, you won't have to worry about repeling. You will actually have to worry about attracting instead, because it is fact that ALL OBJECTS WITH MASS ATTRACT ALL OBJECTS WITH MASS.

To fly around magnetically, you just point to a star or planet and align your atomic magnetic domains with it.

Get a 10 ton piece of metal, electronically flip the polarity of it, and it should repel from Earth with 10 ton's of lifting force.



[edit on 26-5-2008 by ALLis0NE]

Originally posted by purplemonkey
the same reason air bubbles floats to the surface of a lake....

I knew someone was going to say that, I was actually waiting for it.

Now tell me, why exactly ON AN ATOMIC SCALE do air bubbles float to the surface?

You are going to say "pressure" but what is pressure really? Weight?

Please tell me ON AN ATOMIC SCALE why does a boat float on water??

Water is diamagnetic you know!

You guys can argue all you want, I already know how to levitate 30 ton blocks of rock. I learned it from Ed Leedskalnin and the Egyptians...

----
edit add
----

Inertia doesn't exist when you are attracted to the very particles that cause inertia. Inertia is caused by particles flowing through objects. Even in zero gravity, a 10 ton object has resistance when you try to push it. This is because there is no place in the universe where these particles do not exist, and when objects travel through space, these particles pass through the object and give it some resistance.

When you are attracted to these particles, or the particles are attracted to you, intertia is not existant.



[edit on 26-5-2008 by ALLis0NE]

thats actually a rather interesting theory
never even tried that hanging wire thing
think i got some experimenting to do

Please do tell how you are going to levitate 30 ton blocks of rock. Or better yet, please do show us.

[edit on 26-5-2008 by postmeme]

You guys can argue all you want, I already know how to levitate 30 ton blocks of rock. I learned it from Ed Leedskalnin and the Egyptians...

Hey dude, I'm totally with you on this side of the coin.

Bruce Cathie is a MUST READ for anyone who wants to understand this idea A LOT more thoroughly.

However, Im getting a kind of distateful feeling every time you say

I learned it from Ed Leedskalnin and the Egyptians...

you DIDN'T learn ANYTHING from these people, please stop saying you did...as if you "PERSONALLY know them or something.

Sure you may have read up on these subjects and by some s-SST-R-E-T-C-H, added to your own research.

Neither Ed Leedskalnin NOR the Egyptions EVER left any material that you could have LEARNT from.

However, I'll shall stop ranting now and ask you this.

Rather than showing the *AHEM* proposed end result to highlight your theory, Why not tell us WHAT IT IS you learnt from Ed .L and the Egyptions.

If you can,... tell us HOW Ed.L built, moved, then REbuilt his castle. If you can, you do realise you'll be the ONLY one in the world that can

And hows about some calculations. have you been able to marry the current theory for gravity with your own. ie: When you run your model through the calculations, are you able to CONVERT/and EXPLAIN EVERYTHING that is observed with regardes to the CURRENT model?

Sorry to approach you like this, but you speak with that "WAKE UP EVERYBODY, I KNOW THIS AND THAT" attitude, but so far, all i've seen is one basic experiment for every to ...err..."Wake-Up" with.


Cheers
AoN

[edit on 26-5-2008 by Anomic of Nihilism]

Originally posted by postmeme
Please do tell how you are going to levitate 30 ton blocks of rock. Or better yet, please do show us.

[edit on 26-5-2008 by postmeme]

UFO tractor beams carry off cows don't they.
I figure the craft is very positive charged and an electron beam
on the cow would carry it off.
People always say there is UFO evidence in ancient history.

I don't think UFOs can haul off anything, inside a metal can and isolated
from the world with sparks and UV radiation all around makes for
a bleak insides and lack of ability to interact with the outside world.

Hey OP, here is an alternate view to your theory, and it's pretty compelling.

If you haven't seen this video take a chance on it. Although it is quite long, I found it to be very interesting. Nassim Haramein has a very different take on gravity.

Google Video Link