Originally posted by COOL HAND
For God's sake this again?
You cannot access the SIPRNET without being allowed on the network. There is no way for you (or anyone else here) to access the SIPR side without the
specialized equipment and access to either the sat signal, a secured phone, or physical connections.
Well hello Mr Spook! I was sure you would pop up pretty soon...
If you read my post I did say that you could not open the door... I am surprised an agent such as yourself failed to notice this... I merely pointed
to the door for those here who did not have this information and the sign on the door says
Note: You must have a DoD-issued Common Access Card (CAC) and originate from a .mil address to enter this sited
But the door exists and no amount of your attempted sidetracking changes that fact. You slipped a long time back mentioning the "50 gigs of files you
have on sensitive materials at work"
I was brave enough, and I can assure folks here that it is not a backdoor to the SIPRNET. You probably won't believe me, but I am sure I am not the
only one around here with a CAC card. I am sure someone else can verify it for me.
Again let me repeat myself I NEVER SAID IT WAS A BACK DOOR... I never implied it was a back door... I pointed to the FRONT DOOR with the warning
notice and the fact you need a pass and be at a .mil computer to access it...
BUT THE DOOR EXISTS and most people did not know this... and that is what ATS is for to SHARE INFO...
Now I personally thank you for confirming your CAC access... I wasn't positive till now
I would say this is proof positive and a case in point about the subject matter of this thread...
But next time before you go gung ho... please read the post carefully... I do not advocate sneaking in back doors or attempting illegal access... but
there are many public info sites available from the Agencies themselves that most people never even thought of looking up
So COOL HAND, have any interesting files you can share 'from work'?

three stars on your post amusing so there are at least three more
[edit on 27-5-2008 by zorgon]