It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Nigerian Cat Woman

page: 4
3
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 25 2008 @ 11:35 PM
link   
reply to post by space cadet
 


Hahaha.. I love those emails!

But on topic. What an odd story. What can you even say about this? One cat turned into the woman, a second was beaten to death, but where's the third now? Police custody? I imagine that it can't stay in "cat form" forever, can it?




posted on May, 26 2008 @ 03:55 AM
link   
reply to post by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal
 

You have made formidable use of quite an eloquent and certainly academically-fortified vocabulary, and appear to be well-educated in matters of serious science. I found myself briskly impressed by some of your linguistic performances.

While reading, I gathered from your bouts with menguard that you strongly disagree that the so-called cat-woman in question could ever exist as suggested by the article in the OP of this thread, which is beyond question your right of choice. I ask, however, for my own clarity: are you stating that modern science has literally catalogued all knowable variables regarding the deliberate, rapidly transmuted form of a body of matter?



posted on May, 26 2008 @ 04:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by menguard
reply to post by enigmania
 


Or perhaps it was entities that know the laws of projection how to morph the physical image around their bodies through thoughtforms.

However unlikely, it is possible.


Jeah, I considered that option myself. IF, the morphing is possible, maybe it woulld also be possible to morph clothes, on a physical or mental level.

However, this story seems very incredible.



posted on May, 26 2008 @ 05:18 AM
link   
'THere are noooooooo cats in ameeeeeriiicaaa....'



Bwahahaha....

Seriously though.. clothes on her?

[edit on 26-5-2008 by GhostR1der]

[edit on 26-5-2008 by GhostR1der]



posted on May, 26 2008 @ 01:05 PM
link   
reply to post by avriel
 


Actually the belief about baby making you immune is incorrect. The verbage on the article I read on it said "because some witch doctors have the belief", not the whole continent and it said " virgin" not baby.



posted on May, 26 2008 @ 02:13 PM
link   
education is a wonderful thing...



posted on May, 26 2008 @ 02:33 PM
link   
she should be asked to do it again



posted on May, 26 2008 @ 05:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by OptionToChoose
You have made formidable use of quite an eloquent and certainly academically-fortified vocabulary, and appear to be well-educated in matters of serious science. I found myself briskly impressed by some of your linguistic performances.


Thank you for noticing. I have also fallen victim to your induced pithy phonetics.



ask, however, for my own clarity: are you stating that modern science has literally catalogued all knowable variables regarding the deliberate, rapidly transmuted form of a body of matter?


Modern science has not to my knowledge and feasible common sense catalogued all knowable variables regarding the deliberate, rapidly transmutated form of a body of matter. I would assume that absolutely anything is possible under the auspicious and energetically conducive and properly controlled and executed environment.

Thank you for being so intellectually amiable, it is a pleasure.


[edit on 26-5-2008 by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal]



posted on May, 26 2008 @ 07:29 PM
link   
reply to post by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal
 


So essentially what you're saying is all of your name calling & professing your version of the truth was because you science hasn't had the experiment to prove it, yet you relinquish the fact that "anything is possible under the auspicious and energetically conducive and properly controlled and executed environment. "?

Oh yeah that's for posting again, thought you said you didn't want to waste the time. I guess it just depends on if someone strokes your ego enough
good to know



posted on May, 26 2008 @ 07:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by Shakesbeer
I guess it just depends on if someone strokes your ego enough
good to know.


Exactly. Ego stroking is something akin to love. You should try it.

What a great world when we can all stroke each other's egos instead of constantly being trampled on by these condescending haters.


Oh yeah that's for posting again, thought you said you didn't want to waste the time.


The time that I didn't want to waste was on disengenuous and ignoramus responses from certain posters. That's for posting again? What are you punishing me or something? Because I didn't feel anything but a slap of jealousy and envy.

[edit on 26-5-2008 by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal]



posted on May, 27 2008 @ 11:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal
The time that I didn't want to waste was on disengenuous and ignoramus responses from certain posters.
[edit on 26-5-2008 by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal]


LOL says the guy with "love" and "transcendent" in his mini-profile who likes to flinge insults as quicker then information...*that's(thanks) for posting such a high-brow response again. Your intellect is truly amazing....so did you find any proof to back up why this is impossible or are we just basing it off your opinion still? Or are you going to exemplify modern sciences' attitude of sweeping under the rug results and experiments that don't confine themselves to convental mentality of matter being little "marbles"(oh and insults, can't forget the ever academic insults)?

-tries to hold back the anticipation of yet another insult!-



posted on May, 27 2008 @ 02:06 PM
link   
reply to post by Shakesbeer
 


If you go back a few posts and read carefully, even from those of yourself, you can readily verify that what I said is true. There were obviously some disengenuous responses and one's of ingorance on the topic coupled with the mechanics of physics.

Now that you're being satirical and rhetorical I'm pretty much finished with this discussion.

Transcendence simply means that it had no origin. If you intend to understand something on my profile you can feel free to talk with me. I don't bite unless you show fear which usually leads to an unsteady hand, and as usual with the Human species, an attempt at defeating anything that they don't comprehend.

Energy is eternal, therefore the knowledge of the objective universe is transcendent, but it is an identical subjectivism for all of us.

Having love surrounded by truth merely indicates, maybe not clearly since it is your viewing opinion, that being love means that one can only be the truth and make a commitment to the truth. Habitual practices have a residual effect on all other aspects of one's life.

If you want to understand someone then get to know them. Assumptions are some of the worst things that we can do to one another.


[edit on 27-5-2008 by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal]



posted on May, 27 2008 @ 02:22 PM
link   
Sounds like some poppy fields must have caught fire around Bolaji Ogundele.
That's some quality stuff!!



posted on May, 27 2008 @ 02:28 PM
link   
reply to post by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal
 


Yeah I read your posts and see the validity to your argument of our current understanding of physics. However, I simply injected some recent experiments that demonstrate theoretical concepts in this physical existence that rises genuine questions about the nature of "matter". Yet you seemed to dismiss them on the basis of the very same calculations and experiments that lead up to the famous double slit experiments. Do you not see the hypocrisy in this? Much like the hypocrisy of someone who professes the meaning of "transcendence" and "love" in the shadow of such judgment that would leave you to assume I am uneducated and a "ignoramus"..hmmm maybe? I don't know, some how I don't think the ol' ego will absorb that one too well..


You said you had evidence to present that matter does not act in this manner yet posted no real data(as opposed to at least the links I posted which would indicate quiet the opposite) so are you going to do that sometime?

I'm just saying don't say "science tells us this is impossible" when it's quiet obvious I can turn around and say the same thing (with an experiment to sight too!).

Originally posted by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal
Now that you're being satirical and rhetorical I'm pretty much finished with this discussion.

Yeah, we've heard that one before...Oh and I look forward to more insults, I find them to be entertaining....



posted on May, 27 2008 @ 02:36 PM
link   
The real question should be how many have actually seen things happen right in front of them that defy the SET REALITY we live in.

You have seen what science has to offer, but have you seen what spirit does?



posted on May, 27 2008 @ 02:45 PM
link   
But 500 years ago in Europe a lot of people saw witches, magicians ,werewolves and ctr. What spirit has to offer and stuff. And numbers of sightings grew especially when Inquisition started to give certain percent of property of the accused. Those evil spirits. Got people killed.
I guess we did not evolve that much ,since there are those who believe that mob acts because it saw the truth and not because it is a mob. Probably another spiritual thing. Cat-women's fault.



posted on May, 27 2008 @ 03:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by Shakesbeer
Yet you seemed to dismiss them on the basis of the very same calculations and experiments that lead up to the famous double slit experiments.


No, I seemed to understand them and you don't. Like I said, if you go back and read my reply carefully it may sink in. I never dismissed the experiments themselves. I dismissed the experiments being applicable to this situation and in regards to your projected suggestion of possible happen.


I am uneducated and a "ignoramus"..hmmm maybe? I don't know, some how I don't think the ol' ego will absorb that one too well.


You've proven insomuch. Like most of the posters here, you're not really out to read the text that is presented, rather you're out to battle. If you read the text (which I presume you won't, given the nature of your subsequent replies) in my reply to you about the slit experiment and the other scientific ecumincal synopsis, then you'd stroll absent from post, I'd hope, with a transparent fathomability of the realm in discussion.

If you'd like I can copy the entire post and dissect it sentence by sentence.

I feel I may have to do this as you don't demonstrate the drive or intent to do it yourself.

[edit on 27-5-2008 by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal]



posted on May, 27 2008 @ 03:27 PM
link   
reply to post by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal
 


Hey, you're back! I thought you where done with this thread? Oh and yes I wouldn't mind a line by line dissection instead of the constant "there I done proved it.." responses from you...oh and the insults, can't forget those "lovable" insults of yours, very scientific and definitely demonstrates your understanding of physics too...good job
omg I can't wait for more! -shudders with anticipation-



posted on May, 27 2008 @ 03:40 PM
link   
reply to post by Shakesbeer
 


It's an insult to my intelligence to be sitting here explaining things to you while you repeat your same rubbish about me having only an opinion, come to find out 2 pages later that you didn't understand it to begin with so it's no mystery why you would continue to spout such ill informed spirited accusations.

Next time ask a question about something you don't understand before putting me on a two page chase of your unrevealing ignorance. I promise that I won't laugh at you.

Now I'm finished.

You can send me a u2u if you want to continue or you can persist in replying to no one with your disengenuous and sarcastic replies to information that you never divulged to begin with.

If you state an experiment as evidence and you don't comprehend it yourself, at least state such.



posted on May, 27 2008 @ 04:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal
Now I'm finished.


Great thanks buddy! love ya!


I find it highly suspect of this lady trans morphing, but why the hell not?(but probably not) If you guys want a little real news from from Nigeria then research a bit before assuming everyone there are some how "sub-human" in their perceptions. here:The google

Not quiet as fun though huh?

Thanks for tuning in


[edit on 27-5-2008 by Shakesbeer]




top topics



 
3
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join