It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
What they were looking for, Carroll says, was an informant—someone to show up at “vegan potlucks” throughout the Twin Cities and rub shoulders with RNC protestors, schmoozing his way into their inner circles, then reporting back to the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force, a partnership between multiple federal agencies and state and local law enforcement. The effort’s primary mission, according to the Minneapolis division’s website, is to “investigate terrorist acts carried out by groups or organizations which fall within the definition of terrorist groups as set forth in the current United States Attorney General Guidelines.”
Carroll would be compensated for his efforts, but only if his involvement yielded an arrest. No exact dollar figure was offered.
“I’ll pass,” said Carroll.
Originally posted by gottago
The pettiness and pervasiveness of the paranoia, and anti-Americanism and unconstitutionality of these actions, are simply astounding.
Originally posted by St Udio
Why didn't the FBI agents tell the prospective snitch/whistleblower/informant that the meeting was sensitive information
and any public disclosure of the recruiting attempt would hamper the FBIs
mission by revealing secret operational methods & tactics....
and he was under an 'Unofficial Gag Order'.
Originally posted by Hal9000
I agree with most of this statement, but how is this unconstitutional?
This is no surprise and has been done since the sixties. They employ informants on radical groups just as they do for drug suppliers.
Originally posted by gottago
Agreed this has been going on since before J. Edgar Hoover put on his first dress, but still doesn't make it right to allow it to happen or condone it.