Positive and negatives with this.

Positive, the kids wont be brainwashed by all the crazy stuff kids spread around.

Negative, what about their social life, friends etc?

[edit on 22-5-2008 by _Phoenix_]

I understand that public education is breaking down all over "first" world, but there must be a lot of private schools in US. And not a single one suitable??? Not that sure that it is wise step.
Anyway, i think that he entitled to make such a decision - his kids, his money,his idea.

How will it be frowned upon? You said it was his natural right to do so what what business is it of other people? None.

The biggest problem with celebrities is the media... they document every single move they make and broadcast it for the world to see.

People wonder why celebs are so messed up??... maybe the fact that they aren't able to take a crap without cameras on their ass.

Originally posted by CPYKOmega
How will it be frowned upon? You said it was his natural right to do so what what business is it of other people? None.

The biggest problem with celebrities is the media... they document every single move they make and broadcast it for the world to see.

People wonder why celebs are so messed up??... maybe the fact that they aren't able to take a crap without cameras on their ass.

I think that britney episode of southpark shows this in detail, how media really can mess people up.

Teaching at the institution is based on the Study Tech approach to learning, a method developed by Scientology founder L Ron Hubbard.

Did anyone else catch that part of it? People can teach their kids how they want, but I really wouldn't want to start my kids down that path.