This topic is in the Breaking Alternative News discussion forum.  (rss)


"Red Team" Penetrates Nuke Lab's Security, Reaches "Superblock"




Topic started on 21-5-2008 @ 09:01 PM by SystemiK


"Red Team" Penetrates Nuke Lab's Security, Reaches "Superblock"


www.globalresearch.ca

During a mock exercise at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), an antiterrorist "red team" breached security and penetrated Building 332, the so-called "Superblock" where some 2,000 pounds of plutonium and weapons-grade uranium are stored. Lab security personnel failed miserably, TIME magazine reported.

Situated in Livermore, California, LLNL is about an hour's drive from San Francisco; approximately seven million people live within a 50 mile radius of the weapons facility. But as the Project on Government Oversight (POGO) disclosed in March,

...the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) has given Livermore Lab a waiver so that it does not have to meet the current security requirements devised by the intelligence community. The encroaching residential community surrounding the Lab has made it impossible to properly protect the Lab's weapons quantities of plutonium and highly enriched uranium. ("U.S. Nuclear Weapons Complex: Livermore Homes and Plutonium Make Bad Neighbors," POGO, March 17, 2008)

(visit the link for the full news article)



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-5-2008 @ 09:01 PM by SystemiK


On the one hand I'm glad to see that some of these drills are happening, but when you look at the bigger picture, there are some alarming problems which seem to be getting swept under the rug.


But as POGO senior investigator Peter Stockton told The Washington Times: "It is important to emphasize that Livermore's security problems are not the fault of the guard force, who have complained about their lack of training and poor tactics. In fact, two security officers were fired for raising these problems."

Is there a pattern here? As with other spectacular failures by the Bush administration and their corporate cronies, why not, if you'll pardon the pun, shoot the messenger? After all, its less politically risky than bringing high-end lab executives and senior managers to account.



In 2005 the Department of Energy "approved the doubling of the amount of plutonium stored at Livermore, less than five months after a scientific panel recommended, for security reasons, that nearly all of it be moved to a safer, more remote site," TIME revealed.

Yet despite this alarming disclosure, the NNSA, allegedly the prime defender of the "homeland" against terrorists intent on deploying weapons of mass destruction, gave their political masters--the nuclear weapons industry--a free pass when it came to (our) safety. This too, is hardly surprising given the make-up of the lab's administrative "team."


An excellent article, this is something to keep in mind next time you hear a politician yammering on about how they only want to make us safer. Some times I think that the safety and well being of the people is the furthest thing from our leaders minds. More money and more power seems to be the only focus anymore...





www.globalresearch.ca
(visit the link for the full news article)



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-5-2008 @ 09:36 PM by purplemonkey


oh the facility must need more funding



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:





























ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.075 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread