Burma: We'd rather let people die than allow U.S. aid, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times
Topic started on 21-5-2008 @ 06:14 PM by Quarantine

Burma: We'd rather let people die than allow U.S. aid


www.breitbart.com
YANGON, Myanmar (AP) - Myanmar shunned a U.S. proposal for naval ships to deliver aid to cyclone victims on Wednesday, according to state-run media, dimming hopes that the vessels could provide a major boost to relief efforts.
The New Light of Myanmar, a mouthpiece for Myanmar's ruling junta, said that such assistance "comes with strings attached," citing fears that Washington wants to overthrow the country's government and seize its oil.

The United States, as well as France and ...
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 21-5-2008 @ 06:21 PM by bodrul
reply to post by Quarantine



as much as it pains me to reply to a topic where the OP
hasnt even put any effort into his/her post.

so the United states is just going to say fair play and walk away?
thousends of people dead and thousends more in need of aid.

the united states said it attacked Iraq to liberate the Iraqis from saddam hussain after their failed search for WMDs

now the world sees a true case right in front of everyones face.

the dictators of Burma dont take a shizza about their people and the world stands by and lets it be.
where is the US and its army to liberate the people of burma?
if the Iraqi people needed liberating these people seem to need it even more.

this doesnt just go for the US but china who seem to back the actions.
and other countries



reply posted on 21-5-2008 @ 06:38 PM by jsobecky
reply to post by bodrul



Originally posted by bodrul

where is the US and its army to liberate the people of burma?
if the Iraqi people needed liberating these people seem to need it even more.


Where is Great Britain and it's army? I suggest you concentrate on what you and your country can do, instead of attacking the US.

Or better yet, address the situation in Burma, where the corrupt regime is the reason the people are suffering.


reply posted on 21-5-2008 @ 06:42 PM by bodrul
reply to post by jsobecky



please pay attention to the bottem of my reply
and hopefully it will be as clear as day

this doesnt just go for the US but china who seem to back the actions.
and other countries



reply posted on 21-5-2008 @ 06:57 PM by jsobecky
reply to post by bodrul



I wasn't talking about China. I was talking about GB.

Dedicating the majority of your thread to an anti-America rant isn't forgiven by a short "Oh yeah, and others" sentence at the end.

And again, you should be addressing the corrupt regime in Burma, not derailing the thread with your typical bash-America rhetoric.


reply posted on 21-5-2008 @ 07:05 PM by bodrul
reply to post by jsobecky



not really i only addressed the US mostly
is because of the vast majority of people on ATS seem (those that supported the Iraq war) seem to say alot which is the US invaded Iraq to liberate the Iraqis from a dictator.

same princibles for burma. they need liberating and as you say those people need to be delt with, say what you want about US bashing if saying what i have said accounts for US bashing so be it.

neither the less i wont argue with the fact the UK should also be in there with the US doing something.


reply posted on 21-5-2008 @ 07:08 PM by centurion1211
reply to post by bodrul



The U.S. government undoubtably knows that you've grown hoarse from screaming at them about iraq. I believe that they want to give you and many others here a chance to recover before giving you another country to scream some more about.

Seriously, are you pathologically unable to place the blame where it belongs on this? And here's a hint - it isn't the U.S. governments fault this time. OK?

Even china allowed U.S. military aid for the earthquake victims without worrying about "strings being attached". Where's your evidence that the U.S. required some sort of quid pro quo before trying to save starving people? No, it's much more likely that the military rulers of myanmar are looking at this is a nature's gift in the form of population control.




reply posted on 21-5-2008 @ 07:12 PM by devilwasp
Originally posted by jsobecky

I wasn't talking about China. I was talking about GB.

Dedicating the majority of your thread to an anti-America rant isn't forgiven by a short "Oh yeah, and others" sentence at the end.

And again, you should be addressing the corrupt regime in Burma, not derailing the thread with your typical bash-America rhetoric.


What I think Mr Bodrul was attempting to say was : What is the security council , the G8 and the rest of the modern world going to do about this blatant abuse of human rights. If he picked out America its because shes the country that has the most ability to do something about it, we as Britain do not have the ability to do much about it. We have no carriers to spare, we have no troops to send in, we have no jets to spare. We are stretched to the very limits.....that is unless you want us to pull out of Iraq and Afghanistan all together? Unlike the great US navy which has more ships in its North Atlantic fleet than most of Europe does in their entire navy's put together we are a small nation with very little power projection. But hey, just because he mentioned the worlds super power makes him anti American I mean god forbid that he actually mentioned the US in a negative light for once...I mean jeez that makes him a darn commie....

Bod I'd go hand yourself in before your “rescued” by some “freedom protecting” men in black and taken to a remote island with lots of sunshine and plenty of naval ships near it....


reply posted on 21-5-2008 @ 07:17 PM by bodrul
reply to post by centurion1211



did you even read my reply?
china accepeted the help along with help from other nations.

Burma isnt, they wont accept any help for their people and would rather see them die.

now to repeat what i said before.
the United states (along with britain) used the second pretext liberation of iraqis for the war in Iraq.


i am not blaming the US or are you pathologically unable to read a reply properly?

to make it clear Burma is a clear sign of a goverment that is letting its people die. now i would have expected the US (along with britain) to do what the US and uk are good at liberating countries.

since it seems clear that country needs to be liberated

please state where i said US aid had strings attached and so on.


reply to post by devilwasp




exactly.

also orange isnt my collor even so the sunshine sounds fun compared the rain here


[edit on 21-5-2008 by bodrul]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 4 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 6 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 17 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 5 days ago with 49 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Stop Bashing Us Military Folks.
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 184 replies
Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 10 hours ago, 99 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 6 hours ago, 67 replies