Current model of Nibiru debunked?

reply to post by Agent Venom

---

Hi guys

Im afraid that you missundestood something.

scape velocity is not the vetorial velocity of the planet. That velocity is just the one that a body should achieve to go out of the influence of the sun"s gravity. It means that only at that speed the planet wound't come back in a eliptical orbit arroud the sum. For shure that speedy is unconciable!
I hope I could help.
sorry the bad english !

enric[snip]
from Brazil !
Regards !



[edit on 6-3-2008 by worldwatcher]

can't see poster above. it's an anonymous poster who shows up as having posted in this thread in my fav threads list, but isn't actually visible in most of the threads i see the anonymous user posting in.

anyone wanna explain this?

I'm confused in a 2012 book I read, I think it's called Apocalypse, the author whom I can't remember at the moment sited material that said that "Planet X is 18% larger than Pluto" and that it was discovered in 1989 I believe.. I have to go look for the book.. So which is it??

reply to post by nsk123

---

Good job there is too many people out there like me that get shook up and if any threat out there was true? what could we really do to stop it. One question thou?

In order for planet x to pass us by and the other planets, wouldn't we have to be staying in our own orbital space around the sun? What I mean is even thou earth and the other planets orbit the Sun. At the same time isn't the Sun and the planets around her moving threw space as we orbit her?

reply to post by Anonymous ATS

---

I'm not exactly sure what you are saying here? Yes the sun is moving through space and the planets are moving with it. Our soler system is orbiting the milky way as with other solar systems. Some even say we are not only moving 'around' the milky way but heading up (or down if you prefer) throught the horizntal as well.

My confusion is how does this apply to PX? Maybe it was ther but since its orbit is so elongated maybe we left it behind some time ago? Now if everyone else would leave it behind we could all be happy.

damnit!!!, i wish nibiru was real, i was looking forward to a good riot lol,
thanks for clearing this up for me guys, i've only stumbled on this theory about a week ago and i was hooked ever since, now i can focus on more serious issues
peace

i have to ask - but what EXACTLY is " the current model of nibiru " ? because all i see is an illogical gaggle of often contradictory claims from various people using various sources

and to be blunt few are even internally consisant - never mind mutually exclusive

That "Planet X" would be Eris with moon Dysnomia, formerly called Xena with moon Gabrielle and before that designated as 2003 UB313 first discovered in 2003 but not confirmed till 2005




The problem most people have is confusing the term "Planet X" with "Nibiru" They are not the same though have become so in internet chatter.

Percival Lowell first sought Planet X as there was missing influence in the planetary orbits so there must be a 10th planet...

Eris is slightly larger than Pluto and was what cause Pluto being bumped to Dwarf Planet status.

We also have Ceres (in the asteroid belt) and several other planets (or dwarf planets) recently discovered in the Kuiper belt..

Here is Eris's orbit and size comparison. As you can see this is a very long elliptical orbit



Here are some of the others



Now everyone is picking on Sitchin, but I have to ask where everyone is getting this 2012 Nibiru thing from...




2900 AD not 2012

Thats a long time away... so why worry?

It would really help if people actually read the work they try so hard to debunk