It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Weren't there any cameras on the roof of the Pentagon?

page: 2
4
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 22 2008 @ 09:36 AM
link   


There was no airplane at the Pentagon and we all know it. No luggage and parts and evidence outside means no plane, simple. The people who think that the plane ' disapperaed ' into the building are delusional. Over a hundred tons of plane cannot just evaporate and stop existing because of a crash. How many...how many hundreds of ' inexplicable anomalies' can one person swallow before they retch?


Except, we know from the evidence that pieces of Flight 77 were found all over the Pentagon lawn, in the Pentagon courtyard, between the rings, on the highway and even in Arlington National Cemetary.




posted on May, 22 2008 @ 10:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
Except, we know from the evidence that pieces of Flight 77 were found all over the Pentagon lawn, in the Pentagon courtyard, between the rings, on the highway and even in Arlington National Cemetary.


What evidence shows that the pieces are from flight 77?

I have not seen any official reports that match debris or parts found to flight 77.

As frar as bodies, there is no evidence that shows the bodies from the plane were inside the building.



posted on May, 22 2008 @ 10:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by talisman
So what your saying is that the Headquarters of the United States Military was only prepared for a Brinks Heist? Not believable at all! Of course they had proper video reference of fast moving aerial vehicles.

I mean how else in a projected war would the Pentagon be attacked??


C'mon, if the enemy is close enough to pose for photos outside the Pentagon the war is long over. It sounds like you expect a heroic last stand to be made Alamo style from the Pentagon walls and although it might be nice to have glossy prints of an incoming hellfire type missile I fail to see the point - radar works much better for the function a lot of people seem to expect the cameras to be serving.

You might, one day, have to accept that an enemy attacked you from within your own borders using your own everyday machines as weapons.



posted on May, 22 2008 @ 10:58 AM
link   
reply to post by ULTIMA1
 



Now, how did I know he would show up to "spam" his standard rant?



posted on May, 22 2008 @ 11:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by watchZEITGEISTnow
 


Precisely why they wouldnt release the video that showed it (which i doubt any video actually captured it) People like those represented on this thread are hardwired into believing that the Government committed 9/11 and would call any such video a fake.


I just love this argument. NOT.

They won't release the tapes because they know no one will except them. Give me a break.



posted on May, 22 2008 @ 12:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
Now, how did I know he would show up to "spam" his standard rant?


Just too bad you cannot post evidence to debate my so called rant.



posted on May, 22 2008 @ 12:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by Griff
They won't release the tapes because they know no one will except them. Give me a break.


Well after all this time and all the other things that have been questioned would you except them?



posted on May, 22 2008 @ 12:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by Griff
They won't release the tapes because they know no one will except them. Give me a break.


Well after all this time and all the other things that have been questioned would you except them?





My point is that this is used as an excuse why they don't release the tapes. Which, to me, is one of the stupidest excuses ever.

It's like OJ's lawyer not releasing a video of someone else killing OJ's wife because "some people wouldn't believe it anyway".

Dumb, dumb, dumb excuse if you ask me.



posted on May, 22 2008 @ 12:46 PM
link   
reply to post by ULTIMA1
 


oh, but it has been posted before...and true to form, you denied it.



posted on May, 22 2008 @ 12:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by ULTIMA1
What evidence shows that the pieces are from flight 77?

I have not seen any official reports that match debris or parts found to flight 77.


NTSB report DCA01MA064 indicates that your frequent statement is not exactly correct and at least one critical part survived well enough for them to officially certify it as a genuine component from the remains of N644AA, AA flight 77. It was recovered from the wreckage at the Pentagon.

Surely you've seen that report.



posted on May, 22 2008 @ 12:49 PM
link   
reply to post by Griff
 


Try following the whole thread.



posted on May, 22 2008 @ 01:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by Griff
 


Try following the whole thread.


And here is the other stupid argument I just love.

When shown how rediculous your argument is, claim the opposition is not following along.



posted on May, 22 2008 @ 01:30 PM
link   
reply to post by Griff
 


To be honest, I could give a rip what you think. Your post shows that either you did not follow the thread or did not comprehend the posts, YOUR actions show that, not what I said.



posted on May, 22 2008 @ 01:31 PM
link   
I have wondered about this for a while now. There has to be at least 20 camera angles that could possible show something. With the tapes that were confiscated to the recordings of the pentagon's own DVR's. Out of all those possible shots, the best we can see is a possible pointy end of something just entering the frame. I cant' see why the rest of the footage isn't released unless there really is something to hide.



posted on May, 22 2008 @ 01:37 PM
link   
reply to post by Swampfox46_1999
 


Care to comment about what I said about being on the "Defence Intelligence Agency" roof, standing next to at least 3 cameras pointed directly at the pentagon?

Or would we not believe those tapes either?



BTW, I got to see Saddam's gold AK-47 displayed there. Actually stood about 1 foot away from it.



posted on May, 22 2008 @ 01:43 PM
link   

the 64000 dollar question(s)



Why did WTC 7 fall?
Why did USAF not intercept ANY plane on Sept 11th
Why is the 9/11 video from the Pentagon being kept secret from the public( digital enhancement efforts failing perhaps?)



posted on May, 22 2008 @ 01:44 PM
link   
reply to post by Griff
 


Were you standing next to those cameras anytime between sept 1, 2001 and sept 11, 2001? Because I am going to have to insist on a report stating those cameras were in place and operating on Sept. 11, 2001.



MAN its great to act like a certain other poster....



posted on May, 22 2008 @ 01:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by Pilgrum
NTSB report DCA01MA064 indicates that your frequent statement is not exactly correct and at least one critical part survived well enough for them to officially certify it as a genuine component from the remains of N644AA, AA flight 77. .


Please link this report or post html. Or at least quote form the report a statment that a part from the Pentagon is from Flight 77.

Also the FAA has refused FOIA request to release serial numbers for the 9/11 planes to match parts.



posted on May, 22 2008 @ 01:55 PM
link   
reply to post by Swampfox46_1999
 


Yeah, I'm guessing that those cameras were put up after 9/11.



On the "Defense Intellegence Agency's" roof.


You do know who the DIA is right?

Because there was not a threat before 9/11. Right? Or is it that cameras weren't as good as they are today only 7 years later.

But, no, I don't have a report stating that they were in operation on 9/11. Maybe you should take your own advice and follow the thread posts a little closer? Since I said that I am not definatively sure.

The difference is that you claim to be definatively sure when you have no evidence to back your claims up.



posted on May, 22 2008 @ 01:57 PM
link   
PROPAGANDA!

This is why the government has sequestered the vast majority of the photographic and video evidence from all three 9/11 attack locations.

I'm sure you've all seen the t-shirts, CD covers, banners, etc. circulating through the muslim world showing the WTC towers burning and collapsing.

Why provide to AlQueda thousands of additional pictures of airplane wreckage, bodies, and body parts etc. or video of teh crash, for them to post on their websites, and include in their videos for propaganda's sake?

Another consideration is respect for the families of the dead.



new topics

top topics



 
4
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join