Look around you. It’s happening!! (Beginning of UFO disclosure is now!), page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 68 times


reply posted on 21-5-2008 @ 04:21 AM by Mad_Hatter
reply to post by prevenge



Hey, no hard feelins. I understand where you are coming from. I just thought you were directing all that at me, to which I felt privelaged. No worries, your all good with me!


reply posted on 21-5-2008 @ 05:04 AM by Wallachian
The coverage in the mainstream media is huge lately, not just in the english-speaking world, but also where i live, so i assume everywhere. Here, even an astronaut (the only one my country ever had, ha ha) stated he s convinced of the existance of aliens and also that the governments are keeping us in the dark about it. He also said friends of his, also astronauts, have had encounters with ufos and they have been threatened by their government (russian) to keep quiet about it in the media. I could provide you with links, but they would be useless because of the language.

Yes, the disclosure looks right around the corner. But on the other hand the process might be a long one, because of what disclosure might imply for the human race. Lets take the happiest case (and the most unlikely). Aliens are good guys, they re here to help us or just out of pure scientifical curiosity. Our goverments are also good guys, and they re just working in our best interest without any hidden agendas. Even in this happy case, disclosure would be a long and painful process. Humanity has been known to be a very xenophob and violent race. We cant even stand other humans like us, who differ slightly from us. Plus the masses like to get panicky and hysterical very quickly. True, there are many people all over the world who, just like us, feel like they are ready for this. But masses have a different psychology from individuals.

So my point is that even in the best case we still might be far from disclosure.



reply posted on 21-5-2008 @ 06:39 AM by twiggz
Here's a curve ball.

What if The Conditioning of Humanity surrounding UFO's and alien encounters is a way for government to cover up an even greater, more mindbending truth and believing in UFO's is a step we all must take in order to accept that truth?

Here is an example, what if as a species, somehow the great individuals (i.e., Jesus, Buddha, Pick a Roman Emperor, Confuscious, Edgar Cayce, name one) in history are all great because they've pierced through a dimension that causes us to react psychologically as a larger society? What if they're time here on earth and their works (singularly or collectively, oh and by the way, include inventors like Da Vinci, Tesla, Goddard, etc.) are responsible for creating a pooled "wake" or "after effect" of perception that naturally occurs as seeing UFO's. What I am suggesting is not a simple mass hallucination, but a real warping of reality due to a collective disbelief in something, rather than a positive belief. For as long as there have been humans that think in a higher plane and accept religion, the beliefs that propel them through their daily lives, faith, has offered humanity a great number of positive and miraculous advances like medicine, space travel, telecommunications and the list goes on.

I know this sounds strange, but our existence here is not as cut and dry as seeing and sensing is believing. UFO's might very well simply be for people the anti-religion, not evil or bad, simply faith looking in the equal and opposite direction until reality produces the unexplained.


reply posted on 21-5-2008 @ 06:55 AM by sherpa
reply to post by nexusmagazine



Disclosure in the 'current geopolitical climate' would also involve scrutiny from scientists of every persuasion, religious upheaval, uproar from civil libertarians, economic implications, and a zillion questions like:
- how long have you been dealing with them? what have you said? what have you done with the technology you have derived from your studies etc etc.

And that reflects on my belief on the current situation aswell, in a world that strives to maintain the status quo opening pandora's box is unthinkable, logically it would not be an option for those that control.

Several researchers into ufo disclosure have commented (some pubicly) that there is great 'incentive' to play along with the fear factor with regards to aliens and UFOs. As a magazine publisher that involves this field, I can assure you that if I went down this road, I could be a rich man.

It is interesting to get a view from someone in the media it begs the question, "what incentive have you been offered" or is it merely the benefit of more sales if you publish the conformist line.

Werner von Braun repeatedly warned Dr Carol Rosin that 'they' would play the 'evil alien' card as part of an agenda to control mankind with ET-derived technology.

Von Brauns alleged words are interesting to me, for instance beware the military industrial complex I can see plausibility in them and I have to admit they are always in the back of my mind only to come forward at times like these, another is focusing the peoples minds on various threats, first will come the cold war and potential of nuclear war then terrorism and finally an extraterrestrial concern.

For these reasons, personally I will take any truth that is disclosed, if any, with a pinch of salt for I am convinced it will not be the whole truth.

The basic jist of them is that they are attracted to 'food sources' where they attempt to fan the flames of lust, hate, fear, greed etc. So basically, if you don't want them around you or the planet - simply broadcast pure unconditional love (which is much harder than it sounds) and the 'energy' signal emitted by mankind will change 'frequency' and deny them a food source.

Maybe, you could be right but we are getting etherical here a hard one to prove.

I realise with some of you, that I have just signed my credibility death warrant - so spare us all the flack and sarcastic comments. It is a free world (sort of) and I am entitled to the conclusions of my research. If you told me 20 years ago that I would be sitting here typing this I would have laughed my head off.

It's ok, I don't think anyone noticed

Thanks for your personal disclosure it is nice to have a post with some meat on it now and then.


reply posted on 21-5-2008 @ 07:57 AM by shearder
Oh i don't think we need to be conditined any longer. We also do not need the permission of the Pope to believe in "UFOs", and i am Catholic.

I think it is really common sense that we are not alone in this universe/multiverse - NOR do i believe we are alone in this galaxy. But hey, that's me. We are a mere spec of dust in space where some life formed under the right conditions.

A consideration:
in 1999 the Hubble Space Telescope estimated that there were 125 billion galaxies in the universe, and recently with the new camera HST has observed 3,000 visible galaxies

Consider this, we have 100 billion stars with planets in OUR galaxy, multiply THEORETICALLY by 3000 (galaxies visible) and for the sake of technicality divide by 10, we get 30,000 billion stars with planets in 3000 VISIBLE galaxies.

NOW even more profound, lets assume there ARE 125 billion galaxies multiply that by 100 billion stars in each galaxy with planets thats 12500 billion stars with planets - looks like 12,500,000,000,000 stars with planets - even if 1 billionth has life supporting atmospheres that is 12500 planets with possible life.
There are at least 100 billion stars with planets in our Galaxy,

Lineweaver said. "With about 100 billion galaxies in the observable universe, our result suggests that there are at least 10 trillion planetary systems in the Universe.


And we are waiting to find out if UFOs exist? Well yeah, some need to be shown - but that's also fine. Hell, if i die without seeing it for myself - who cares, i believe it already and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to tell us this.


reply posted on 21-5-2008 @ 08:05 AM by Anonymous ATS
There is a small flaw in the "look at the media, disclosure is around the corner" idea.

If they were desentisizing us they would do a very bad job, because they take to long!
In the 1700s they enrolled Jonathan Swift to write gullivers travel. The idea was to establish in the mainstream the thought that there could be intelligent beings that are not human. 100 years later they talked jules vernes into writing several books, to make sure that further preparation to disclosure would be viewed as merely part of a fiction genre, science fiction to be exact. Later they informed H.G. Wells that they would like to do an experiment on radio and they needed a script. They ordered it 40 years before the experiment to make sure it arrived on time ... a sensible idea, since we all know how writers handle deadlines....
Then they continued with Wise (the day the earth stood still) Spielberg, Lucas ...

So we got 300 years of preparation for disclosure... the guys prepared are for the most part already dead. Lets say they realized with war of the worlds that the world wasnt ready for it ... that was 70 years ago, most of the audience is dead. Lets say they started with spielberg and lucas: 30 years ago... the audience is in their 50ies, 60ies, so they sure as hell cant take another 30 years or they will be dead too.

So i guess it is save to assume that the last few "building up for disclosure" things were harmless entertainment and science fiction, since no disclosure followed, and building up slowely stops making sense after 10 years tops, not to mention 300. So whats different this time? That its the vatican and larry king instead of Jonathan swift and H.G. wells? That its on TV now and not in a book? Or could it be that stories about the unknown sold well 300 years ago and still do today?


reply posted on 21-5-2008 @ 09:16 AM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by alienstar



That is the most arrogant thing I have ever heard! Trillions and Trillions of planets and we are the only one??? It is a mathematical impossibility! I bet you believe the the earth is the center of the solar system as well. It really baffles me how some people can be so arrogant as to completely ignore common sense. No proof needed my friend, you only have to look at the mathematics of it all. We live on earth, the only known planet to support life, how arrogant might one be to suggest that the other trillions upon trillions of planets have none what so ever. I GUESS WE ARE JUST THAT SPECIAL HUH?


reply posted on 21-5-2008 @ 10:29 AM by sos37
reply to post by Anonymous ATS



I wouldn't say "impossible", just "highly, highly, improbable".

Now I do think people who make the statement "Well if we're not alone then why haven't we been visited yet?" are speaking out of extreme ignorance. They fail to appreciate how vast the universe is. If pockets of intelligent life exist here and there, they may never know about each other throughout the lifespan of their species simply because of the sheer distances between them.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 7 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 16 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 10 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 17 days ago with 28 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 1 days ago with 27 member flags