It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Are you "starring" yourself? Because I find it hard to believe that anyone is watching this thread so closely that they would star you within seconds of posting. By the way, having multiple accounts is "illegal" here on ATS.
You seem to think all forms of authority are corrupt and abusive in their manner of enforcement. regardless of a badge, prestige, or years of dedicated service.
Police are brutal savages, and our men and women in uniform are all just "knuckleheads"
Where do you think the Army gets their recruits? Any knucklehead off the street can get an M16 and go kill people out in the desert, innocents and all.
i've seen you claim that civility and order did not exist before 1829, and use that as an excuse to say that we would all be better suited to live an anarchist's lifestyle
but you fail to realize that there were figures of authority prior to 1829. What do you think Americans were fighting in 1779? A bunch of farm boy peasents who came over on a boat?
Applied consistently instead of arbitrarily. I see. So the fact that you violated the rights of your neighbor, doesnt give the police the right to protect their rights? You decided to take the law into your own hands. You admitted you were drunk.
You plead guilty - despite claiming to be innocent.
and you ask for equal application of the law.
nothign i have posted has been off topic. you posted it. I've been reading it for a while. doesnt mean i've been "following" you. Please don't flatter yourself
Originally posted by jackinthebox
reply to post by Andrew E. Wiggin
Wow, even going so far as to follow me around to all different threads to gather up off-topic material just to try to bash my character.
I never said either. I only pointed out the fact that a dedicated police force did not exist until 1829. If you had gone to college for Criminal Justice as I did, you would know that. In regards to "anarchy" please leave the politics at the door.
Sure the police have the right to protect their rights. That's why I came outside and offered myself to them, to answer for what I had done.
I did not decide to "take the law into my own hands." I decided to go tell my neighbor that their cat was crapping all over the neighborhood and that they should take care of the problem.
I don't really see much relevance in the fact that I had some drinks before the incident unfolded.
I pled guilty to avoid spending years in jail for being beat up by two overzealous police officers.
I also try to justify my plea in that it was late when I knocked on their door. Though as I said, it was very late the night I gave them gas money so that they could get to the doctor in the morning, and also late the many other times I saw them out on the porch at night.
clearly trying to show your own version of being innocent. This is the first time you neglect to admit you did wrong. Because later - you say it was you that broke the window.
So, if it was not done intentionally - and no crime was committed, what was the point of hiding it in your original thread?
kind of funny that you proclaim you're bigger and badder than a few police officers. Sort of reaks of "alpha male syndrome"
The basis of this article is that police use their tasers when its absolutely nessessary.
Usually, if a person does not comply after a third five second “cycle” from the EMDD, police officers should consider using a different technique of force within that level of force being applied.
Originally posted by FiatLux
Wiggin, you need to drop it now. What your doing is borderline harassment, enough is enough. Get over it.
Yet your pictures show a medium size bruise on your arm.... repeated kicks in the torso alone are going to leave long-lasting bruises in a highly bruisable area. Kicks in the head will also leave ample amounts of bruising, yet nay a picture of that.
technically speaking - you admitted to being drunk on another persons property. "legally speaking" they'd laugh you out of the court room. Its not public property.
The big hole in your story is the fact that you withhold information left and right. So what else are you holding back? Sounds like a highly unlikely story to me.
So - you witnessed a "cracked out officer" punch your highschool girlfriends daughter in the stomach so hard she bled, and that inspired you to wear the badge? Something else not adding up.
First off - you said your fine was $10..another contradiction...
Because the states attorney has better things to do than waste time with a drunk guy who broke his neighbors window over some cat feces.
you admitted guilt. Therefore, you are guilty.
I am not derailing your thread, i am challenging your assertions, like any other conspiracy.
I confess, police brutality exists. However, your assertion that its rampant and widespread, and a sort of 'company policy' is one of asinine proportions.
a very great mind has already debated this very issue, and with a TKO blow, he won it - hands down.
But when my niece makes a mistake...breaks something, etc. Her natural response at such a young age is " i didnt do it!" and she'll take that statement to her grave.
You are holding out a lot of information here. So my only reasonable conclusion is that you're hiding it for a reason. What is that reason?
Because you deserved it, but cant bring yourself to admit it.
- from the T&C
2c.) Multiple Accounts: You will not create multiple user accounts and "talk to yourself".
Its funny that your tone changes so fast....now your story "isnt important" whereas before it was your magnum opus.....
I didnt spend an "inordinate" amount of time doing anything. I've been reading your posts basicaly since i got here, so it was really just a matter of recollection from memory.
If you really don't think that ALL police are corrupt, then i give you credit. But the tone of all your other threads suggest other wise, then when you post this update, i have to call shenanigans.
You condone taking things into your own hands like some sort of 'alpha male' vigilante. I say that is what police are for.
You call me derrogatory names as a consequence. Intrepid had to edit out the more insulting ones
The overall trend of all of your threads is that you're the victim and everyone else is the oppressor. Well, either you have the worst luck of any human being that the world has ever herad of, or you inflict these things yourself.
...you were messing around your neighbors house and broke their window. I would have called hte police on you too.
You assert that it was your girlfriends daugther. as you say "happend to a girlfriend of mine in highschool"
I suppose it was the Jews' own fault too, along with the millions of people who were oppressed and starved in the old Soviet Union, or all of the people starving in Africa. I'm sure the people of North Korea are to blame too when there is so little food that they eat eachother. You're right, oppression is the fault of the oppressed.
You call it "relevant" information when someone says "why didnt you post it in the beginning"...
...and then - afterwards, you call it "irrelevant" by saying it wasnt even a crime, because it was unintentional.
you were abusive and trying to intimidate the police officers
You have issues with police that your'e not revealing.
you're not even responding to the flaws in your thread
so i guess that means im right?
you get forced out of your house and trouble with the cops.
actually - you did. and verbatim. You asked
My guess is you went to pull your weapon out of your pocket, and you got jacked as a result.
Whats the point of carrying a weapon on you anyways?