Why can no one prove a Masonic conspiracy?, page 37
Pages: <<  34    35    36    37    38  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 13 times


reply posted on 26-9-2010 @ 10:04 PM by KSigMason
reply to post by Ruffian


Yeah, P2 was a irregular, clandestine, rogue Lodge that no real Masonic body recognized. They didn't adhere to the rules, regulations, traditions, and charges of true Freemasonry.


reply posted on 26-7-2011 @ 11:20 AM by network dude
reply to post by capozelli



You are told the same thing by your parents.
If you join the military, same thing.


reply posted on 26-7-2011 @ 11:34 AM by DeReK DaRkLy
reply to post by AugustusMasonicus




I have yet to see one individual prove that there is a ‘Masonic’ conspiracy of any type taking place.


Firstly, I think that the word conspiracy gets thrown around WAY too much.
If a high-ranking official takes a bribe, for example.. whether it be a policymaker, a military officer, a judge, etc., this is not so much a conspiracy as it is an act of greed. When acts of greed (and other misconduct) are coordinated repeatedly among individuals, then it starts to lean towards conspiracy.

Now, obviously the average, everyday run of the mill "Porch Mason" has no real effect on global society, but if you put one in a position of real power/authority, then at that point greed and power tripping CAN become an issue, because we all know what money, power and notoriety can do to people.

Of course, not all "high-ranking" members of the various power structures are Masons, and not all Masons are corrupt individuals, but I'm willing to bet that the world's most powerful people are nearly ALL corrupt, and that a fair share of them belong to some kind of fraternal order or other.

Now someone's going to say..."Can you back this up with facts?" but I needn't do that because human nature speaks for itself. I know people are out of their freaking minds and that's so apparent!


reply posted on 26-7-2011 @ 11:56 AM by JoshNorton
reply to post by DeReK DaRkLy



In ANY group of people, some portion will be corrupt or will have joined for the "wrong reasons". Nobody here denies that.

What we find contentious is the idea that such corruption is both systemic in Freemasonry and that there is some way the presence of a corrupt Mason in the fraternity would have control or sway over the majority of non-corrupt members in any way.


reply posted on 26-7-2011 @ 03:44 PM by DeReK DaRkLy
reply to post by JoshNorton




What we find contentious is the idea that such corruption is both systemic in Freemasonry and that there is some way the presence of a corrupt Mason in the fraternity would have control or sway over the majority of non-corrupt members in any way


Then the question must be pondered, what percentage of corruption does an organization have to reach before it begins to do more harm than good?


reply posted on 26-7-2011 @ 04:20 PM by AugustusMasonicus
Originally posted by DeReK DaRkLy
If a high-ranking official takes a bribe, for example.. whether it be a policymaker, a military officer, a judge, etc., this is not so much a conspiracy as it is an act of greed. When acts of greed (and other misconduct) are coordinated repeatedly among individuals, then it starts to lean towards conspiracy.


The intent of my Original Post was aimed more at the accusations of systemic or endemic corruption within the Fraternity. Most of us would concede that an individual could be invloved in actions that you classified as 'greedy'. I have not seen anything brought forth in this thread that would involve a larger and more concereted effort by members to practise wide-spread corruption or misconduct.

Now, obviously the average, everyday run of the mill "Porch Mason" has no real effect on global society, but if you put one in a position of real power/authority, then at that point greed and power tripping CAN become an issue, because we all know what money, power and notoriety can do to people.


There have be many Masons in positions of 'power' throughout the Institution's history and while there have been individuals who have not acted in the best manner I do not think their actions were propelling some form of over-arching Masonic agenda. I think that they were just people who acted either antisocially, irresponsibly, with poor judgement, etc.

Of course, not all "high-ranking" members of the various power structures are Masons, and not all Masons are corrupt individuals, but I'm willing to bet that the world's most powerful people are nearly ALL corrupt, and that a fair share of them belong to some kind of fraternal order or other.


What other fraternal order do you accord them membership with?
Pages: <<  34    35    36    37    38  >>    ^^TOP^^



Leaked video of freemason-show.
  Posted 5 days ago with 37 member flags
The Templar Uprising
  Posted 17 days ago with 17 member flags
Jay-Z is Nicki Minaj?
  Posted 5 days ago with 11 member flags
CNBC yet another Luciferian ILLUMINATI Network ! ! !
  Posted 18 days ago with 7 member flags
The Three Ruffians
  Posted 14 days ago with 5 member flags
32nd level mason
  Posted 3 days ago with 4 member flags
The Hive Mind
  Posted 11 days ago with 2 member flags
A Transparent and Open Secretive Society devoted to Truth
  Posted 6 days ago with 2 member flags