It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Keith Ferrazzi's book Never Eat Alone suggests doing good work for friends and acquaintances asking nothing in return. Though the book never mentions Masonry, I found many of the ideas of service the same. Another (non-Mason) friend of mine was recently asked to join the advisory board of a local arts non-profit simply because he'd regularly volunteered to do things when they needed to be done, like picking up guest speakers from the airport. The executive director noticed his regular presence and contribution of help.
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
Excellent point Brother Norton, I do believe they call that networking and some companies actually charge you for the same service. It is in fact how I acquired my present position-and no, it was not from a Mason-and is an invaluable tool when one is seeking employment.
No, no and no. I really don't think that the networking aspect is at all "what it's about", at least in my lodge. It could be a natural consequence of people spending time together regularly, but it's not why we do so. Personally, I'm not all that outgoing... I'm not going to go out drinking with the guys after lodge 90% of the time. Some of the younger members are probably tighter knit because they spend more time together beyond the walls of the lodge, but I've got other things to spend my time on.
Originally posted by Capozzelli
reply to post by JoshNorton
Do you feel that masonry is more of a networking and social club now then when it was created? Is this what masons usually do when they are in lodge meetings? Do you think that this can possibly become a problem if people ask for too much or don't get there way or maybe they don't deserve what they are asking for?
Originally posted by JoshNorton
As to feelings of entitlement or disappointment if good work isn't recognized? I don't see that as being a problem. Again, at least not in my lodge. We had an extra long meeting last night... four degrees to confer, and by the end of it, there were only a handful of us left. I was among them. The WM mentioned in passing that he appreciated us sticking around. That was enough of a pat on the back for me, and it really wasn't necessary... I wasn't sticking around for him. I just knew that there were duties that needed to be performed, and I saw the gap where they might not get done if I didn't step forward, so I did.
*shrug*
I have yet to see one individual prove that there is a ‘Masonic’ conspiracy of any type taking place.
Originally posted by Researcher
Maybe it's where you keep your head, that keeps you from seeing...
Originally posted by Researcher
Over and over and over, over the course of many years, I have posted the tedious dismal drivel written by 33d degree Freemasons. Here.
Manly P. Hall
Foster Bailey
Albert Pike
J.D. Buck
C.W. "Lend a hand" Leadbeater ( 19th century Michael Jackson. Beat It would have been an appropriate song for this schoolteacher )
Originally posted by Researcher
Over and over and over the same Freemasons post the same numb responses - including you.
Originally posted by Researcher
"You just cut and pasted that from Freemasonry Watch" ( actually I scanned them from my personal library ) Why would cutting and pasting what was said by Freemasons make what was said by Freemasons less valid?
Originally posted by Researcher
"These guys don't speak for Freemasonry, nobody does" ( The same can be said for the Mafia, the Hells Angels, the KKK... ) What kind of an organization hides behind no front at all?
Originally posted by Researcher
"You are taking it out of context, you would have to be a Freemason to understand" ( I have to go with the notion that when Manly P. Hall says The Great Plan of the Ages has unfolded over the course of thousands of years, he means The Great Plan of the Ages has unfolded over the course of thousands of years )
Originally posted by Researcher
It's called denial.
Originally posted by Researcher
Maybe it's where you keep your head, that keeps you from seeing...
Over and over and over, over the course of many years, I have posted the tedious dismal drivel written by 33d degree Freemasons. Here.
Manly P. Hall
Foster Bailey
Albert Pike
J.D. Buck
C.W. "Lend a hand" Leadbeater ( 19th century Michael Jackson. Beat It would have been an appropriate song for this schoolteacher )
Originally posted by Dark_Ace
becuase masons are really good at hiding the truth
Your very language betrays that you don't quite understand masonry - the writings of a "33rd degree freemason" mean nothing more than the writings of any other mason. And I could quote to you from numerous masons - 33rd degree and otherwise - which directly disagree with the works of Pike and Hall.
It doesn't really matter, because none of these people speak for the fraternity.
You either don't understand research, or your ignoring it.
Its very obvious why authoritative freemason sources are most important - they are primary sources.
If you were interested in doing research instead of supporting an anti-mason world view, you of course would know the best two sources for what your researching are primary sources and secondary peer reviewed sources. Interestingly, anti-masons can never provide information from either of those two sources to support their claims - because there is no conspiracy here.
Trying to point out who speaks for freemasonry is like trying to point out who speaks for your anti-mason group
The fact that there is no centralized ruling masonic body is of course evidence against anti-mason claims concerning world domination - how could we do so without a central ruling group?
Now your just making things up.
That you disagree with the answers given does not make them any less true. You can contiue to assert that Hall, Pike, Bailey, et al 'speak' for Masonry and employ an invalid arguement that somehow annoits these indivduals as spokemen.
Amswer me this: if their writings are to be taken as Masonic gospel-truth by yourself, why should every other Masons opinion not be as justly valid? Quotes and opinions do not prove a conpiracy, facts and evidence are required to accomplish this feat.
Now your just making things up.
I will await your answers and the additon of some evidence that disproves my Original Post.
Originally posted by Researcher
I have worked at my current job for 14 years. My coworker Dave has worked there about 14 weeks. You got questions, who are you going to ask: the graybeard or the whiskerless?
The point is, they are IN the fraternity and they speak OF the fraternity. What is known in legal circles as "confession against interests"
You mean... I have to give back all my paychecks for the last 35 years? If you had the slightest clue what I do, where I do it, who I do it for, you would know how ridiculous that statement is.
A primary source on Freemasonry would be... let me see.. I know! A Freemason!
Secondary peer reviewed sources - has nothing to do with this conversation. You hide behind the conventions of science when discussing politics.
Tell me - which anti-mason group am I a member of?
We don't know that there is no centralized group. We only know that there is no centralized group known to the public.
Lets review: They are all 33d degree Freemasons. As such, they passed through the lesser degrees. They were elevated to the 33d degree in honor of their contributions to Freemasonry. These are not the new kids on the block. It's sometimes called "Listening to your elders". In this case, I'm listening to YOUR elders.
No they're not. Let's review, indeed: Bailey & Leadbeater were Co-Masons. Neither were ever members of the Scottish Rite or a regularly recognized lodge. Hall wrote his most popular stuff decades before he even became a Mason.
Originally posted by Researcher
That you disagree with the answers given does not make them any less true. You can contiue to assert that Hall, Pike, Bailey, et al 'speak' for Masonry and employ an invalid arguement that somehow annoits these indivduals as spokemen.
Lets review: They are all 33d degree Freemasons.
Originally posted by ALightinDarkness
So I have a ton of masonic scholars, with PhDs, who have written books which in some cases in large portion disagreed with the writings of Pike and Hall.
Originally posted by Researcher
I have yet to see one individual prove that there is a ‘Masonic’ conspiracy of any type taking place.
Maybe it's where you keep your head, that keeps you from seeing...
Over and over and over, over the course of many years, I have posted the tedious dismal drivel written by 33d degree Freemasons. Here.
Manly P. Hall
Foster Bailey
Albert Pike
J.D. Buck
C.W. "Lend a hand" Leadbeater ( 19th century Michael Jackson. Beat It would have been an appropriate song for this schoolteacher )
Originally posted by Fire_In_The_Minds_of_Men
And be specific about which page of which book from which author "disagrees" with fatboy Pike or the wanker Hall.