It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
No.
Originally posted by 12.21.12
Aren't their many parrellels in the 1st initiation that would imply selling your soul, or subjecting it to vulnerability to uphold the masonic secrets?
Don't know what you mean by alternate teachings. If you mean like algebra teaches alternate teachings than English lit., then yes.
Do you not learn in you persuit of becoming a 33rd degree mason alternate teachings than the Bible or Torah or what have you?
It doesn't.
When does Luciferianism come into play?
No.
Do you all study the work of Aleister Crowley??
Any individual is free to study that, but it's not something that has anything to do with Masonry.
Are you guys very familiar with Thelema and other teachings??
Originally posted by 12.21.12
Aren't their many parrellels in the 1st initiation that would imply selling your soul, or subjecting it to vulnerability to uphold the masonic secrets?
No.
No, there are no symbolic deaths or rebirths in the 1st degree initiation. I don't know where you're getting that there are, but it simply isn't true. (And as has often been mentioned, the rituals are out there for anyone to find via Google if you doubt me...)
Originally posted by 12.21.12
reply to post by JoshNorton
Originally posted by 12.21.12
Aren't their many parrellels in the 1st initiation that would imply selling your soul, or subjecting it to vulnerability to uphold the masonic secrets?
No.
Could you please ellaborate any further on that, or tell us more about the sole purpose of 1st degree initiation? Other than becoming a mason and swearing to uphold masonic secrets.
Isn't it called being "born again" isn't that the theme of the 1st degree initiation?
Originally posted by 12.21.12
So as for somebody who might be interested in Freemasonry, count me in. However I would never join or take the 1st degree initiation rights because I am flat out convinced that masonry is evil.
Originally posted by 12.21.12
You can't prove me wrong either, because in doing so you would confess masonic secrets. The only way I can find out is to get initiated. Then I would try to convince myself that I did the right thing, whether I believed it or not.
Originally posted by 12.21.12
Freemasonry only survives because the veil it works under, if it were a public matter, it would be the equivelent in todays society as satanism wether it is or not, there are way to many things about freemasonry that are not the teachings of god, but quite the opposite.
Originally posted by 12.21.12
It's like the story of Adam and Eve. You ate the apple, I didn't.
Originally posted by 12.21.12
I am not condemning freemasonry or generalizing it or comparing it to satanism. All I am saying is that as far as I can tell, from what I have learned and the nature of this orginization to me; is evil.
Originally posted by 12.21.12
In society, if freemasonry made itself public, it would be condemned and compared to witchcraft or satanism. Not my opinion, just reality.
Originally posted by 12.21.12
No hard evidence, no sources, no references.
This whole thread is kind of silly, trying to expose an orginization shrouded in secrecy.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
your response to blood oaths...
Why not? They have to do with culture instead of religious beliefs. Our current culture would find them unsettling. But the culture of medieval England considered them normal. All Christian knights took such oaths in the middle ages, and Jews also have a long history of it. Consider Jepthah, in the biblical book of Judges, who offered his daughter up as human sacrifice to Jehovah in order to fulfill an aoth.
Yikes!!!
They were probably introduced into Masonry during times of persecution. At that point, to be known as a Mason meant torture and execution, so utmost secrecy was stressed.
An alternative theory is that Freemasonry derives from the Knights Templar. Therefore, the inclusion of a military oath in the ceremonies of a craft guild was supposed to be "hint" toward the fraternity's true origins.
Originally posted by justpassingthrough
I did read somewhere that you must protect the fraternity and your brothers no matter what, with the only exceptions being murder or treason I believe. Is any of this true? I just don't know what to believe is all and I like to hear all sides of the story and form an opinion from there.
Originally posted by ALightinDarkness
I think the wording of the oath depends on the state (in the US) or jurisdiction, but for NC the wording is very carefully laid out. Basically, the thing you are referring to is the oath that a mason will protect the secrets of another master mason. However, the wording is very particular that the obligation is true only if the secrets are told to me and received by me as such, AND I find the brother worthy. I, and every mason I know, would never find any brother worthy if he breaks any law - because such conduct is unmasonic. Its a bit circular, but the oath is stated that way in NC for a reason - basically it means I will keep secrets from a brother I find worthy, but I will find any immoral or illegal conduct unworthy because it would be unmasonic. What other secrets could there be? Nothing other than the completely benign type of "secrets" you might tell a good friend.
In NC, you can still take the oath quite literally and your still not under the obligation to cover up someone else's crimes or immoral activity.
Regarding "masonic documents" - again, at least for NC, the Grand Lodge have *several* books that go into fantastic description about the ritual for which anyone may read. It includes the charges for each degree, a description of it, even has little pictures. Anyone can purchase it from the grand lodge too. It's an official masonic document that goes into a fair amount of detail about the ritual. No, you will not find a verbatim copy of the ritual sold by the grand lodge except a book that is in cipher form (which is easy to figure out, you could buy it and figure it out easily if you wanted to). Nor will you find it for any fraternity, the elks, or the Knights of Columbus. This is not because its heinous, but because - again - ritual is kept secret as a demonstration of fidelity. In this day and age people forget that it is an important trait that people be able to keep a secret - few people can. It doesn't mean the secret is evil, but simply that there is innate value in being able to keep something confidential.
Originally posted by 12.21.12
Aren't their many parrellels in the 1st initiation that would imply selling your soul, or subjecting it to vulnerability to uphold the masonic secrets?
Do you not learn in you persuit of becoming a 33rd degree mason alternate teachings than the Bible or Torah or what have you?
When does Luciferianism come into play?
Do you all study the work of Aleister Crowley??
Are you guys very familiar with Thelema and other teachings??
Originally posted by 12.21.12
In society, if freemasonry made itself public, it would be condemned and compared to witchcraft or satanism. Not my opinion, just reality.
Originally posted by justpassingthrough
Well, I think the human sacrifice and oath to God is a different best than taking a blood oath to protect your fraternity and brothers above all, even breaking the law. is this correct?
I did read somewhere that you must protect the fraternity and your brothers no matter what, with the only exceptions being murder or treason I believe. Is any of this true? I just don't know what to believe is all and I like to hear all sides of the story and form an opinion from there.