1.Mankind has been beaten to death with sexual inuendos, do you think this has anything to do with abduction- purposes, to serve as sex slaves or for
reproduction purposes? Those in the lower chakras can only be tampered with.
2.Sexual Magic is popular amongst esoteric circles, and other paganistic rituals. To be one with the land and free from form. Tantric sex deals with
opening the body energy up with the universe.
3.Child molestation:Cases of molestation in churches for the all loving god, apparently moral doesn't play ethics roles. Why
4.Pornography is one of the highest watched shows and purchases of movies. Does this have to deal with creating a new hybrid species?
5.Is our world becoming Sex Slave World? You watch television on a normal commercial and there--it- is--with some sexual content, why is the
commericialism so idealistic about what they want put out?
6.Who is really pushing behind the scenes for an (all out world of lust) and no morals?
7.Why is television pushing the envelope with so much hardcore television even though television is viewed or targeted by a young audience? To ensnare
perhaps a new world of controlled followers (by beliefs) setup on a world wide stage.
8. Can a World be seduced into leaving this world is only through cosmic orgasms?
9.Perhaps our mankind isn't durable in violence and resilence but perhaps do to our breeding process as a whole?
10.Wars have been faught over woman in the past, why not now? As bush, had said, 'why not for the romantacism of war'.
You view anything with MA-17 and it has mature audiences, but how come even in the (Lion King) there is hidden subliminals with the words sex, when
paused, the normal eye wouldn't catch it but the naked eye would.
Why is it all of our old (Walt disney movies) have so much mature visuals either in the background or foreground but only those old enough sought
after would KnoW about.
Have the bounderies been crossed through innocence and appeal to the adult industry?
Why are shows so subjective to this worldwide behavior? Is it in the background, that our worlds scientists, seeing as a means stands now, the only
way it will be saved is Through Reproduction
A mind controlled society through the hormonal level!
Do we still have Gods OF OLD fighting in prewar games of survival?
Who is behind this Saturation process of globalism and idealism, why is the world being set up for dualities?
And what sides are you choosing to fight for?
They give you a society set up through a belief system that can be subjected to any change the global imperialists see fit?
They break down the civilian people anytime it gets a chance to push forward out of the -Global Consensus- through commercialism, hidden subliminals,
thought action reaction.
One big 'MASS PSYCHOLOGY TEST' being performed through your very eyes, the people.
What Hitler did to a Nation was nothing, compared to a Nation United with Prosperity.
Pornography equals a chance for alien hybrids.
Why stop at humans and animals why not aliens for sexual reproduction.
Using animal fur or stuffed animals in erotic photography doesn't seem to be taboo, nor do photographs of nude models posed with animals provided
no sexual stimulation is implied to the animal. Stuffed animals are sometimes used in glamour erotic photography with models touching their sexual
organs against such animals, and likewise models may be posed with animals or on horseback.
The Miller test was developed in the 1973 case Miller v. California. It has three parts:
Whether the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest,
Whether the work depicts/describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functions specifically defined by applicable state
law, Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value. (This is also known as the (S)LAPS test-
[Serious] Literary, Artistic, Political, Scientific).
The work is considered obscene only if all three conditions are satisfied.
The first two prongs of the Miller test are held to the standards of the community, and the last prong is held to a reasonable person standard. The
reasonable person standard of the last prong acts as a check on the community standard of the first two prongs, allowing protection for works that in
a certain community might be considered obscene but on a national level might have redeeming value.
For legal scholars, several issues are important. One is that the test allows for community standards rather than a national standard. What offends
the average person in Jackson, Mississippi, may differ from what offends the average person in New York City. The relevant community, however, is not
Another important issue is that Miller asks for an interpretation of what the "average" person finds offensive, rather than what the more sensitive
persons in the community are offended by, as obscenity was defined by the previous test, the Hicklin test, stemming from the English precedent.
Because it allows for community standards and demands "serious" value, some worried that this test would make it easier to suppress speech and
expression. They pointed out that it replaced a stricter test asking whether the speech or expression was "utterly without redeeming social
value"--a much tougher standard than "serious" value. As used, however, the test generally makes it difficult to outlaw any form of expression.
Much pornography has been successfully argued to have some artistic or literary value.
[edit on 20-5-2008 by menguard]