Cops with new license plate reading technology, page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 22-5-2008 @ 10:45 PM by jackinthebox
reply to post by W35M4N



...and if you aren't commiting a crime what's the problem?


Oh God, give it up with that same old lame reasoning. I wasn't committing any crime when I was detained for almost an hour.


When the Nazis came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist.

When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.

When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.

When they came for the sick, the so-called incurables,
I did not speak out;
because I was not mentally ill.

When they came for the Catholics,
I did not speak out;
because I was a Protestant.

When they came for the Jews,
I remained silent;
I wasn't a Jew.

When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out.


- attributed to Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984) about the inactivity of German intellectuals following the Nazi rise to power and the purging of their chosen targets, group after group.




reply posted on 22-5-2008 @ 11:04 PM by jackinthebox
reply to post by Tiloke



Ummm, you were drunk in public and damaging other people property.......


Umm, what the hell are you talking about?

Actually, I was driving to meet my brother at a New Year's party.

[edit on 5/22/0808 by jackinthebox]



reply posted on 22-5-2008 @ 11:05 PM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by cutbothways



We've got the same system here in Vancouver, Canada, but it's used in marked cars as they go about doing their regular patrols. The computer beeps when it picks up a suspect plate of a stolen vehicle, an unlicenced car, a person who's on parole and isn't supposed to be in certain areas, etc. If used in that way, I haven't any objection, but I can see how it could be abused. Anyway, the RCMP are trying to get the system expanded to the entire province.
-Gord


reply posted on 22-5-2008 @ 11:12 PM by Tiloke
Originally posted by jackinthebox
reply to
post by Tiloke



Ummm, you were drunk in public and damaging other people property.......


Umm, what the hell are you talking about?

Actually, I was driving to meet my brother at a New Year's party.

[edit on 5/22/0808 by jackinthebox]



My apologies. I though you were talking about the other time you were doing nothing wrong and the police bothered you and beat you for no reason.


reply posted on 23-5-2008 @ 04:01 AM by tallporl
reply to post by cutbothways




This is already active in the UK... the Motorway/highway patrol cars have had them for a while and the technology is now being implemented into motorway cameras and street CCTV.

I feel like i've had my eyes shut.

Paul


reply posted on 23-5-2008 @ 05:31 AM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by cutbothways



Well I never all I can say is big deal fella. She was breaking the law. Thats why we have penalties for breaking the law. Thats why we need surveillance to catch persons who deliberately break the law and take chances with everyone else's life and finances(ie there is a cost involved that flows on and on from the effects of all our misdemeanors). Now if they had pulled her out of the car and started kicking her you might have a point. I say might because depending on the background of a person, their particular crime and curent behavioural pattern who knows what beneficial effect even that may have - after all smart arse lawyers and ridiculous laws at times conspire to set homicidal maniacs free so there may even be latent perceived justification by law enforcement officers. It is worth remembering that what they deal with on a daily basis cannot be handled without counselling after a period and is bound to inflict permament mental distress in some.
However I have digressed from the lady in the car who broke the law and I reckon that they should use the system with a list of registered firearm carriers as well as being known for previous armed unwarranted behaviour. Lets get right into it.


reply posted on 26-5-2008 @ 11:24 AM by eyewitness86
reply to post by Anonymous ATS



AMEN brother!! The scanning will be unseen and will track us and note where we are and when...total control. The goal is of course control, and we must resist control or be treated as the sheep we are. It always amazed me that a huge bull could be kept in a field by a flimsy fence...the bull could simply run thru it but he never tries and only sees the obstacle..never tests it, and remains trapped forever.

The sad fact is that we are cattle and the fence is going up fast. Individual resistance and teaching Rights is critical now. I found out that locally very few people have any awareness of their Rights or how to use them. Like Edward R. Murrow said" A nation of sheep beget a government of wolves'.


reply posted on 30-5-2008 @ 01:38 AM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by fiftyfifty

I'm sure we all understand where you are coming from, however an undercover cop running license plates doesn't seem like an efficient way to nab the type of people you've described. How many known terrorists, hardened criminals, or people who are wanted for major crimes will actually be behind the wheel of a car registered in their own name in an area where these "screenings" occur? In my opinion, this is a form of knit picking, low man on the totem pole can't catch a break type of set up. Big time operation...a bunch of arrested unlicensed or non-ticket paying drivers off of the streets while the murderers, rapists, thieves, drug dealers etc ride right on by in the passenger seat of a legal car or even on the bus. By the way, the whole unmarked car/blending in thing...doesn't really work like some may think. An unmarked car patroling a parking lot row by row makes it even more obvious that something is going on then a regular patrol car would. Hello. As far as not having any worries if you're legal, I beg to differ. Getting pulled over can be quite an ordeal. Multiple cars arrive making it even more embarrassing, valuable time is lost while every passer by gawks as you wait for your credentials to be verified all for the cop to find out that you were telling the truth when you said this was your boyfriend's car and your license is valid.
Get where in going on this point?


reply posted on 4-6-2008 @ 05:56 PM by verylowfrequency
I think this technology is a great tool for locating stolen cars, or doing quick lookups when pulling vehicles over, but that's about it. Once we start to use it as a Minority Report tool to constantly scan and take offenders off the roadways next we will add to the list of what will constitute a valid reason to make one an offender. Eventually they might disable your car or pull over your vehicle for not paying your power bill on time, or being late to work, not paying child support, etc. etc.


The sad side it is/will being used like a high tech cash register that's primary purpose will be to enforce the collection of fines that have nothing to do with safety or the good of society, but have more to do with greedy corrupt municipalities who use it as a tool to create more taxes out of nothing in order to raise their budgets and create more wealth and power for themselves in the guise of public safety.

Can't pay that traffic ticket on time cause your not a perfect driver and decided to feed you kids instead - Well guess what your going to jail on your next trip to work and the kids are going foster care where they'll cost the taxpayers more money for the corrupt care and then they will end up in prison because the state sponsored caregivers raped them for eight years, and they can't deal with society themselves. To get your car back you'll have to give up buying the kids new clothes or toys this Christmas. All because you're a big bad criminal for not paying your ticket or showing up for the Kangaroo traffic TAX court.

There is nothing good about a police state except for the police and their handlers.


[edit on 4-6-2008 by verylowfrequency]


reply posted on 4-6-2008 @ 06:12 PM by verylowfrequency
I'm all for using new technology to create a better safer world, but we need watch how they are merged with old ideas or technology and can become out of control monsters.

The real Danger is we don't want overzealous LEO's using this technology in place of rational decision making and training that no robotic tool or computer program can replace.

For Example: Our military relies on such identification tools in order to discern enemy targets from friendly or civilian ones. On July 3 1988 U.S. Navy's guided missile cruiser USS Vincennes overzealous crew misidentified a commercial airliner
Iran Air Flight 655
as an F14 shot it down and killed nearly 300 civilians (66 children). All because they crew got caught up in what the technology read along with their frame of mind which caused them to not fully understand the data which led to missiles being fired on a civilian aircraft.

I'm all for new technology for safety, but I think we need to be more careful how and who we label as criminals or enemies as we all need to live together and treating everyone like criminals does not make for a better happier world. Remember everyone of these people arrested or treated badly will get out and if we can't treat them respectfully than don't expect them to be respectful in life or on the highway when they come back.

[edit on 4-6-2008 by verylowfrequency]
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 16 days ago with 276 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 12 days ago with 122 member flags
STOP....Take a STEP BACK....and look at the BIG PICTURE!!
  Posted 18 days ago with 115 member flags
Was this the real reason why Megaupload was closed down?
  Posted 17 days ago with 96 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 15 days ago with 85 member flags