Originally posted by dunwichwitch
I heard a story from a friend of the family that a scientist had a brick sized block of mined uranium (not purified at all) sitting in his lab for
several years, and one day while doing an experiment with a geiger counter, he accidentally realized that the brick was actually uranium. I don't
know what kind of stupid scientist that was, but I'm guessing even depleted uranium is more pure than freshly mined uranium.
Isn't this a variation on the "A friend of my father's co-worker's uncle's wife's hairdresser told her that..." sort of story? It certainly
sounds like it to me. I don't suppose this scientist has a name, or even a position? I'm asking because it's relevant to your comment. Let me
paraphrase it into a question, if I might. "What kind of stupid scientist was that?" Answer: Perhaps some kind other than a geologist? It's not as
though 'freshly mined uranium ore' comes out of the ground with a greenish glow around it, and warning signs already hanging from it.
As for depleted uranium being more pure than freshly mined uranium, it is. As to whether it's more dangerous, different story. The uranium ore is
probably going to be more radioactive, but the depleted uranium *is* a heavy metal, and has all of the health risks associated with same.
Either way, look at some of the Indian Reservations where they mine uranium. Mine workers (often native americans themselves) getting terribly sick
and dying, drinking water being contaminated, deformed babies, sick and dying livestock and crops.
I can't look at the reservations or the workers, since you haven't cited any sources for these Biblical-scale catastrophes. If you'd be kind enough
to do so, it would be appreciated.
Uranium and people just don't mix... and it is sick and twisted that we use depleted uranium on the tips of bombs and warheads when bombing innocent
people's homes and apartments and such.
You might look into how and where depleted uranium is used. It's not used on every type of weapon in a theater. It's used in applications where high
armor penetration is mission-critical...things like discarding-sabot AP rounds for a tank's main gun (not very effective against apartment buildings,
by the way), or rounds for the A-10's GAU-8 cannon. It's not used in bomb casings or in run-of-the-mill missile warheads because it's not effective
in low-velocity impacts.
You might also look at some objective figures for collateral damage. Any is too much, but in a real world, it happens. That said, there's a reason
the U.S. military is using more and more guided weapons.
Here's a simple question: If we're trying to kill civilians in some sort of genocidal campaign, why are we using something so inefficient and
slow-acting as depleted uranium? Why aren't we simply carpeting places like Fallujah and Sadr City with cluster munitions and napalm, and getting the
killing done?
Make all the excuses you want. I'm biased towards the war AND the use of depleted uranium on innocent towns and villiages, not to mention it's just
not necessary AT ALL, and I am rightfully biased. If you aren't biased towards this, you're completely blind to the suffering of others, and the
fact that the US govt/army can and will do some really horrible stuff.
[edit on 19-5-2008 by dunwichwitch]
Ahh yes...the righteous (or self-righteous) indignation phase. "IF YOU DON'T AGREE WITH ME, YOU ARE A HEARTLESS B***ARD!". I'll point out once
more (without resorting to the
ad hominem) that depleted uranium isn't used against towns or villages...it's used against armored vehicles
and, rarely, against heavily fortified positions.
You have the right to any opinion you wish regarding the war in Iraq, or on the use of depleted uranium by the U.S. military. You do *not* have the
right to assume that any and all who disagree with your opinion are your moral inferiors. Alongside the right to have an opinion, you have the
corollary responsibility to make certain that your opinion is based on the best possible information. Given your repeated (and mistaken) assertions
regarding the use of depleted uranium, I can't help but question your information on the subject.