Egyptian statue on mars?, page 42
Pages: <<  39    40    41    42  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 184 times


reply posted on 10-3-2011 @ 01:46 PM by Gazrok
reply to post by iammonkey


Interesting find...but in all honesty, I think you're just seeing what you want to see. We see examples like this on our own planet all the time, in rocks, trees, etc., where the right set of circumstances results in shapes we identify as something other than "natural". I remember seeing a tree trunk in a Ripley's museum that had a very well defined face, just as a natural growth.



reply posted on 12-5-2011 @ 11:25 PM by connorromanow
reply to post by iammonkey


that is pretty cool, i amade a video about this kind of stuff on the moon and mars, im gathering clips for a second would it be ok if i used this


reply posted on 14-5-2011 @ 12:45 PM by TC Mike
reply to post by iammonkey


Well it is not exactly an egyptian statue on Mars, but it merely looks similar to one. Are we to suppose an ancient civilization went to Mars to end up building statues, pyramids, cities, and other megolithic structures? Well the megolithic stones here on earth indicate only an advanced technology could precision make them and transport them to use in construction. If the same is on Mars, then it stands to reason that same ancient civilization is the Martian builders. All past civilizations we know of do not fit the bill as qualifing to be this civilization. It is a lost civilization as far as we know. But if they did go to Mars, the colonized it because it was habitable at the time. All we have are some myths and legends of them, who are most popularly known as Atlantis.

These so called Atlanteans were men, they were not aliens from some far away galaxy. In other words, forget the ancient aliens theory. The truth is been freely available in a book that has been highly available for many centuries, the Bible. This so called "empire of Atlantis" was the worldwide empire in the days of Noah, and even before his time. It was destroyed in the flood sent by God, the deluge. God destroyed mankind on earth with a global flood so powerful, that it changed the nature of the solar system. The floodwaters of the great deep rocketed out of the ground from miles below with heat & pressures great enough for some debris to reach the escape velocity of Earth. This debris, (water, sediments, & rocks), bombarded other planets and moons in our solar system. This bombardment is what created similar cataclysms on Mars and effecively destroyed the colony of "Atlanteans" there.

I know it is a different take on this, a more of a creationist viewpoint. Billions of years are not needed, just roughly 6000 years. The explainations still fit, perhaps they fit even better and are in a way, more simple to understand.


reply posted on 8-2-2012 @ 09:45 PM by kstallsworth
I know this thread has been up a while, but I just stumbled upon it tonight and actually had a few things that came to mind.
1. To me, the statue looks unfinished. Along with looking Egyptian, this makes a lot of sense, because the builders in ancient Egypt would abandon works in stone if the stone became cracked or otherwise damaged during the carving process. Completely abandon and not even try to salvage the piece, which looks like could easily have happened here.

2. The fact that it does appear very similar to Egyptian works is also very interesting because of speculation that the original "Face on Mars" has characteristics of the Sphinx, even so much as appearing to be wearing a headdress with the same stripe patterns.

3. Researchers are beginning to seriously start looking into the correlation of different pyramid structures in various ancient civilizations, and coming up with some very interesting facts, particularly the association with astronomy. I have read that the "pyramids" on Mars (located near the face) also have a specific link with astronomy.

Now, I'm not saying that this is conclusive proof, but I also tend to think that the simplest answer is usually correct and honestly, to me personally, it's more a stretch to say that these things are random. Besides we just now discovering that these ancient structures on our own planet have ties to space and the stars, that would have been impossible to know about when they were built, or at least they would be with the technology that we believe they had. (or lack thereof)


reply posted on 9-2-2012 @ 03:37 PM by ArMaP
Originally posted by kstallsworth
1. To me, the statue looks unfinished. Along with looking Egyptian, this makes a lot of sense, because the builders in ancient Egypt would abandon works in stone if the stone became cracked or otherwise damaged during the carving process. Completely abandon and not even try to salvage the piece, which looks like could easily have happened here.
As far as I know, most sculptors do that, as a cracked stone is not usable.

2. The fact that it does appear very similar to Egyptian works is also very interesting because of speculation that the original "Face on Mars" has characteristics of the Sphinx, even so much as appearing to be wearing a headdress with the same stripe patterns.
That speculation was based on too much imagination and small photos, more recent photos with higher resolutions show nothing like that.

3. Researchers are beginning to seriously start looking into the correlation of different pyramid structures in various ancient civilizations, and coming up with some very interesting facts, particularly the association with astronomy.
Really? What researchers? Could you point some specific researchers? Thanks in advance.

I have read that the "pyramids" on Mars (located near the face) also have a specific link with astronomy.
They are on a planet.

Now, I'm not saying that this is conclusive proof, but I also tend to think that the simplest answer is usually correct and honestly, to me personally, it's more a stretch to say that these things are random.
Why? We have many examples of things like that appearing without human intervention here on Earth.

Besides we just now discovering that these ancient structures on our own planet have ties to space and the stars, that would have been impossible to know about when they were built, or at least they would be with the technology that we believe they had. (or lack thereof)
Once more, could you please provide some kind of evidence of those discoveries? People in ancient times had a great knowledge of the stars (better than most of today's people have), and saying that something was impossible to hide our ignorance about a subject is not the best way of discussing that subject.


reply posted on 9-2-2012 @ 10:06 PM by NYCUFO
reply to post by iammonkey


When you view the huge original photo it's like being inside a warehouse where artifacts are kept. Besides the many figures one can make out there are openings of various shapes. I gotta study that photo a little closer.
Pages: <<  39    40    41    42  >>    ^^TOP^^



Egg found in Martian Meteorite
  Posted 17 days ago with 126 member flags
Bad Ufologists-Lets clean the closet of any skeletons
  Posted 9 days ago with 52 member flags
Death by UFO!
  Posted 14 days ago with 49 member flags
UFOs during Satellite launch
  Posted 8 days ago with 49 member flags
Tracey Taylor - "Aliens Gave Me a Special Gift"
  Posted 8 days ago with 31 member flags
DIVINE INTERVENTION: ETs Defeating Old World Order
  Posted 16 days ago with 29 member flags