reply to post by Parabol
Parabol what you said has forced me. Yes FORCED me to crack open another bottle of baileys and start on a family size bar of chocolate. Hope you feel
guilty.
Seriously though, you say its plainly a rock. I don’t doubt that. But to me it’s a carved rock. And I think that’s why the thread has continued.
(with the help of your post. Thanks for the bump.) No one has proved, or disproved this is just a rock. Although Vanitas has given me food for thought
as well as ArMaP. Therefore, I’m still open to other possibilities.
Now about lunica post. Showing the scale of things. As I said before, can we trust the information from NASA in regards to size? But for argument
sake lets say there telling the truth. And it is very small. I don’t see that as a good reason to dismiss it out right. Look at the size of
these.
As regards the amount of time spent. I really don’t have that much to spare. Some people play golf, read a book. I enjoy looking at mars pictures.
People already see us conspiracist as loonies. If threads on this site solely depended on evidence, there wouldn’t be many threads.
en.wikipedia.org...
Many theories - including conspiracy theories - rely on the assumption of rational expectations. Under this assumption, events and decisions are
explained by the rational responses of groups and individuals.
(I wasn’t going to add the next bit because I just know their talking about me.)
For relatively rare individuals, an obsessive compulsion to believe, prove or re-tell a conspiracy theory may indicate one or more of several
well-understood psychological conditions, and other hypothetical ones: paranoia, denial, schizophrenia, mean world syndrome.
Paralol if you want to stay sane do not read any further. No hard feelings. All the best iammonkey.
[edit on 27/5/08 by iammonkey]