AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

This topic is in the 9/11 Conspiracies discussion forum.  (rss)


Proof of mainstream media involvement?




Topic started on 17-5-2008 @ 04:47 AM by twisted-timothy


This video demonstrates the multiple flightpaths of the planes on 911. In reality there can be only one flightpath right? Well, unless you believe otherwise this would mean that the images shown to us by the mainstream media were doctored.
Civil debunking is encouraged and welcomed in this thread

YouTube Link


-twisted



   copyright & usage 
Click here for more 9/11 Conspiracies topics
Hot Topics   |   Top Topics   |   This Week   |   Subscribe   |   Home


reply posted on 17-5-2008 @ 03:39 PM by sensfan


How does that video proof of anything, other than planes hit the towers? Multiple flightpaths? You do realize that your perspective and angle of viewing might have something to do with what angle/degree the planes are travelling in right? Oh wait, you're not one of those "no planers" are you? Hasn't that been debunked over and over and OVER again on here?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-5-2008 @ 05:31 PM by twisted-timothy


reply to post by sensfan



Hey sensfan After studying the many shots of the second strike it appears that the plane does indeed have multiple flightpaths, even after consideration of different camera angles (please compare the flightpaths at 0:04, 0:16, 1:07, 1:16, 1:28, 1:49 and 2:13). Only a few theories would be able to account for this
-Media Fakery
-No plane theory
-Quantum Planery
-Terrorist Magicians
I made those last two up, but whilst it would be hard to prove that something did not exist (as in no plane theory) there is still overwhelming evidence of forgery in these videos.
Forgery pointing to media involvement.
If multiple flightpaths has already been debunked please please please provide a link (NPT and Media Fakery makes for a very lonely conspiracy theorist, If I really am retarded or crazy then somebody set me straight!!)

-twisted



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-5-2008 @ 05:34 PM by sensfan


Oh I don't need to provide links...just do a quick search here on ats with the key words "no planes", you will find plenty.

Have fun ;-)



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 17-5-2008 @ 07:11 PM by twisted-timothy


I find a lot of talk about no planes, holograms, nosecones and theorists smoking too many cones but it all goes nowhere.
I am a no-planer but the argument I'm making is for MEDIA FORGERY and the proof is the inconsistency of the plane's trajectory. Something I havn't found debunked in other threads.
You may or may not buy into NPT, but it should be painfully obvious that even if the planes were real, the footage isn't



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-5-2008 @ 06:28 PM by sensfan


Here's a thread right up your alley then. All about fake footage and whatnot. complete hogwash if you look at it with an open mind instead of going in with the notion that the video broadcast that day is fake. Don't want to get into it here, as it's been done to death, but how do you explain all the eye witnesses who saw the planes hit, and filmed it...are they all lying and faking it too?

ATS THREAD - TV Trickery (hogwash)



   copyright & usage 




















































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.046 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.