reply to post by Mabus
This is going to be my last post on this thread, and possibly to any of your posts in the future. I may read them, but won't reply.
I won't hit the ignore button, however, and I never have because I believe everyone has something
to bring to the table. Heck, even you.
Miss me with the version of me thing by YOU. This anti-Christ (me) is anti-version of me.
Your first line makes no sense whatsoever.
And from your second, I think you're saying that you are your own paradox. Interesting concept, but completely unfounded apart from in your own mind,
unless you're trying to communicate that there's more than one of you living in your own mind. That I will agree is entirely likely.
Let me speak as me.
If only the real person behind your member ID could
shout through the fog of confusion you're stumbling through.
Dont pend things onto me nor put your words as if I said them how you describe.
I rarely if ever pick up on bad grammar, heck I'm guilty of the occasional literary hiccup, but pend?
Do you mean hang?
Are you using an online thesaurus to try and make your posts sound more academic and wordy? I've stated before that I accept your first language may
not be English, and if it isn't I apologise for my flippant remarks. Likewise if you suffer from some form of dyslexia.
If you don't, and you're native tongue is
English, however, this is a classic example of why I can't take you seriously in anything you say.
Self important language does not make you imporatant. In fact its incorrect usage has quite the opposite effect.
Again, I can't see "the" Mabus being anything but a scholastic and formalistic genius when it comes to oratory. Wooing a following to become loyal
takes immense verbal skill and a tactical, political brain. Pointing out you are who you say you are based on the premise that your screen name is the
same as a 16th century visionaries anti-christ is not
going to win you any votes.
[quoteAnd it's reguardless in how you would hope to wound me image wise.
, with respect, and there's no saying this lightly, you have no image
[quoteThere is no help for you I will say.
Sorry, but I don't think it's me who needs help.
You havent proved me as not the Mabus yet. That's because you cant. Only things you can do is state opinions which arent facts about me.
Errr, as far as I'm aware, it's not down to the audience to prove who the speaker is. And if you mean my opinion that you aren't the prophecised
Mabus, then my answer is see above
I can put the correct view about me inside your brain when you let me. Those who wont let me are those who are the common foe and for the
common foe's devices.
"When you let me?"
Why in the world would I even consider
, even for the slightest moment, the remotest possibility that you are the
You're trying, and failing miserably, to convince one guy in Ireland of who you claim to be!
So, after I'm done with you, is your grand plan to try and convince the rest of the planet one by one
? How many replies have you received on
this thread? Most of them are from me. Does that not tell you something
I asure you and can even re-asure you this is "the" Mabus. I let the devil be a lethal threat and danger to the devil. I revive truth as
No, I'm not "asured" (sic). You seem to disreguard anything that doesn't fit into your individual viewpoint to the extent that you are possibly
getting near to being lost to normality completely.
Maybe you indulge in recreational drugs (if you do, dump
them), or have a psychological condition (maybe caused by trauma or abuse), or are
simply a rabid troll (if you are, you're singularly unsuccessfull), but either way you are barking up the wrong tree and wasting your life in the
meantime. Yes, you're getting attention, but not for the reasons you want.
And by the way, I don't hate you; I feel sympathy for you, I truly, truly
do. Think what you like about the intention behind my responses to
your thread, all I'm actually doing is disagreeing with your opinion through discussion. That is what ATS is all about.
And dont be fooled to think what's to come true isnt in words to come true in writing. Writing is such as an unexpected event in itself.
Events can be as anything, even the simple things.
Ok, I tried to decipher this, it's darn difficult, but what I think you are trying to say this:
"Do not be fooled into thinking that what was prophesised in writing may come to pass as it was set out. Writing about them as such is an unexpected
event in itself. My words are events, even as the simplest things that foretold my coming."
There, now doesn't that
sound more grandiose and turgid?