Personally, I think Dr. Reeds story is fabricated.
But I'm amazed at the amount of questions that are easily answered if one decided to do any sort of research into the case. Yet everyone calls hoax
without even doing any investigating into the case?
Not even extensive research, just 15-20 minutes time looking at a couple of videos. Questions like...
-why does it's skin color change from blue, to dark brown(because it was in a freezer for 8 hours...how would we know what colors an aliens skin
changes post mortem, or when frozen, like we turn blue when frozen, you know?).
-what happened to the dog( it was vaporized).
-why are there no close-ups of the face, (there's plenty).
-why is he yelling at the camera to work when he is trying to video the black object(because everytime he got close to it his camera would
-why is the alien only blinking? (maybe because it has a baseball size hole on the other side of it's head?, things like that can paralyze being from
the neck down).
All those questions can be found out, again.. by doing just a cursory search on this case.
Again I believe this is a hoax, a very elaborate one, and hard to pin down for sure, but at least do some research into a case before calling hoax.
This person seems to have the most complete collection of videos pertaining to the case if anyones interested in learning about more about this
And here are parts 1 and 2 with an interview Dr. Reed did with Art Bell which explain quite a bit of what was being asked earlier in the thread.
I only listened to the first 3 (don't know how many there are with Art Bell interviewing, I think 5 total) before I had to go do some things around
Again pretty interesting story, but I'd have to say hoax. Most of all being this guy is a Dr., not a Captain Kirk stunt double, that takes out
advanced aliens with dissintergrating ray guns with a piece of wood.
"Dammit Jim I'm a doctor, not a gladiator."
[edit on 18-5-2008 by Nola213]