It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Johnathan Reed's Close-Up Alien Blinking Video - best footage ever? (video)

page: 21
51
<< 18  19  20    22  23  24 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 13 2009 @ 04:27 PM
link   
reply to post by answers
 


Hi answers. Welcome to abovetopsecret.




posted on Feb, 13 2009 @ 05:30 PM
link   
reply to post by visionandtruth
 


First of all, learn how to use the quote button. Re-reading your posts several times in multiple posts is getting extremely annoying. It's hard to differentiate your new text from your previous text without using the quote feature.

Secondly, supply evidence for the Star City trip, not just meaningless words and a false youtube video showing the Peru trip. You have yet to supply any evidence to substantiate your claims, and its imperative that you do. Otherwise, you need to stop lying.

[edit on 2/13/2009 by pjslug]



posted on Feb, 13 2009 @ 07:10 PM
link   
I thought you all might like to see the question I asked Clifford Stone regarding this case. Here is the post with his answer:

Clifford Stone thread -- reply to PJslug

I have a tendency to agree with his opinion. Why would Reed still be alive when his other friends were killed? It doesn't really make sense, unless Reed is under constant protection by bodyguards 24/7.

And if he was really in hiding in fear for his life, he has seemed to be fortunate enough to enjoy the luxury of stuffing his face. He's gained a bit of weight since this case first broke. Someone who is in constant fear and in a traumatized emotional state would be less than hungry.

So this is yet another reason to doubt the truthfulness of the case. It could however just be another coincidence, though.

(But please, when you click on the link, scroll down and read my reply to Clifford and then his subsequent reply to me, and my next reply back to him. He gave me some stupid, vague answer. I'm not sure why.)

[edit on 2/13/2009 by pjslug]



posted on Feb, 13 2009 @ 07:25 PM
link   


He's gained a bit of weight since this case first broke. Someone who is in constant fear and in a traumatized emotional state would be less than hungry.


He's probably on a diet of macdonalds, it's quick, convenient and you can grab it whilst on the run.



posted on Feb, 13 2009 @ 07:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by pjslug
Why would Reed still be alive when his other friends were killed? It doesn't really make sense, unless Reed is under constant protection by bodyguards 24/7.


Unless his "friends" were fed up with the lies and were going to tell all. I wouldn't put it past Mr Reed to "off" them himself seeing as he's such a desperate character, probably with the same gun he shot himself in the shoulder with..


And that Clifford Stone......I NEVER trust anyone who calls everyone "my friend", that was one of John Lears traits. It's a great way to keep posters happy and not actually provide real answers.



posted on Feb, 13 2009 @ 07:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by free_spirit

Originally posted by visionandtruth
theXChronicles videos.
Reed standing with Russian Cosmonauts.
take care.


Wrong, Reed standing in Peru in August 2003 as well as Marina Popovich and other
cosmonauts not in Star City Russia and not invited by scientists. Check the page.

peruufo.com...


I knew there was a reason I asked about this "top scientist" twice and still never got an answer.



posted on Feb, 13 2009 @ 07:56 PM
link   
reply to post by nerbot
 


Don't also forget the "God Bless."



posted on Feb, 13 2009 @ 08:17 PM
link   
reply to post by pjslug
 


"and thankyou for posting"




posted on Feb, 13 2009 @ 10:04 PM
link   

Sadly, even if the video were real it would be hard to believe it. Any second-rate special effects designer could make an alien dummy that's eyes blinked.


CGI didn't hit the shelves until about 2002-2003 with Maya, which used to be called Alias Studios.

The only CGI program that was available at the time of the video was Lightwave, but Lightwave is incredibly hard to use.

So, sorry. Gotta disagree.

Also, when he tried to film the UFO, there was distortion to the camera. The funny thing is that it was analog distortion (The camcorder was analog. Tape only). It only happened when he tried to get close or zoom in.

Very unlikely even the triangle craft was CG'd. You can tell by the way when the camera moves.
Same for the ET. Look at the damn head wound.

And from what I would speculate, maybe the incident with the dog happened, and then he ran back home, dropped the dog off (lest it would happen again), grabbed a camera, and ran back to the site. He's hyperventilating enough to have run something like that. That combined with the fear and reality of what happened, it's plausable....


[edit on 2/13/2009 by impaired]



posted on Feb, 13 2009 @ 10:20 PM
link   
reply to post by pjslug
 




Slug from what you are replying to one would think you didnt comprehende what took place in my response, while nearly the same time you ask me to learn how to use the quote button. Thats ironic inandof itself, to me.
Concerning Star City, Russia dont worry about it Slugs.
My words and their continually consistant legitimacy has you watching, as well as others, and they have not been proving false. One sign to know your [mines concerning this case] words carry weight is when people inside a message board start telling you [me] to 'show evidence' as if somehow words on a screen can reach through a monitor into your living space and give you physical evidence firsthand right in front of your 3dimensional face. [ a losers last ditch effort ] When people resort to those trademark tactics slugs that is when I know they are irritated at the amount of visual evidence and video testimony presented to them and others who are actually in support of such an astounding case such as Reeds case.
Thats when I know my words of support and the evidence presented stands on solid ground and debunkers and skeptics cant say much towards whats been presented.

For the other guy Truth Projects help with the video clips sure do lend credence in support of Dr Jonathan Reed's case as well.
Concerning you directly slug, sorry but for some reason, I dont know why, but what youve just said above doesnt mean much to me. I dont know why. Just doesnt. Ive tried to cause myself to be intrigued or even amused by your words, even your statement concerning what youve decided to call a lie. For some reason your words do nothing for me.


[edit on 13-2-2009 by visionandtruth]



posted on Feb, 13 2009 @ 10:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by impaired
CGI didn't hit the shelves until about 2002-2003 with Maya, which used to be called Alias Studios.

The only CGI program that was available at the time of the video was Lightwave, but Lightwave is incredibly hard to use.


You're kidding aren't you?


1990 saw the first actual release of LightWave on the Commodore Amiga-based Video Toaster.

Lightwave Wikipedia Source

Not hard to use if you know how to use it.

I don't think Mr Reed's smart enough for CGI though.....the "model" was polystyrene or cardboard in my opinion and suspended with taught fishing line from trees. It's also looks just about the same size as the inside of a station-wagon...?

COULD have been CGI, but probably beyond his capability.

Cheers, nerb

[edit on 13/2/2009 by nerbot]



posted on Feb, 13 2009 @ 10:42 PM
link   
posted on 13-2-2009 @ 07:10 PM single this post "quote"REPLY TO:

SLUGS GETS RESPONSE FROM CLIFFORD STONE:

I thought you all might like to see the question I asked Clifford Stone regarding this case. Here is the post with his answer:

Clifford Stone thread -- reply to PJslug

I have a tendency to agree with his opinion. Why would Reed still be alive when his other friends were killed? It doesn't really make sense, unless Reed is under constant protection by bodyguards 24/7.

And if he was really in hiding in fear for his life, he has seemed to be fortunate enough to enjoy the luxury of stuffing his face. He's gained a bit of weight since this case first broke. Someone who is in constant fear and in a traumatized emotional state would be less than hungry.

So this is yet another reason to doubt the truthfulness of the case. It could however just be another coincidence, though.

(But please, when you click on the link, scroll down and read my reply to Clifford and then his subsequent reply to me, and my next reply back to him. He gave me some stupid, vague answer. I'm not sure why.)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VISIONANDTRUTH:

People are amazing. The question concerning Reed being alive can be easily answered logically and Ive answered this question logically a number of times when dealing with the same questions concerning why Reed is alive.

While its ten years later since this story broke debunkers and skeptics focus on Reeds weight, I think about the Link Artifact and what individuals have testified concerning its working capability. And I think about the multiple witnesses who have come forward and confirmed the many activities surrounding what Reed initially stated concerning his case.

But for some supposed 'researchers' in the field weight is an issue of importance.


But concerning why Reed is still alive I wont answer that question right now. Reason why I wont answer it now is for two reasons. First - everytime I answer it people shut up and never bring up again because of how I answer it. Hopefully maybe someone else may come along and give the same logic answer I will give so I wont have to.
And secondly - I will hope others come and continue making statements concerning why they think he is still alive in regards to whether or not this would even be possible if, as they say, 'people are after him.' Which is a flawed and inaccurate statement.



posted on Feb, 13 2009 @ 10:57 PM
link   
Vision, once again, please provide the names of the recognized top scientists who agree with Reed`s claims.


Thank you

[edit on 13-2-2009 by johnjohn808]



posted on Feb, 13 2009 @ 10:58 PM
link   
Those videos look interesting and particularly strange but in my opinion, I feel they were a hoax. I have never heard of any aliens who had brown skin. And the alien seems to look a bit peculiar. Looks a bit like a doll.



posted on Feb, 14 2009 @ 12:05 AM
link   
reply to post by visionandtruth
 


My words now do nothing for you but before when I was more inclined to believe the case, you kept telling people to listen to me. You are so full of B.S. that the room is starting to have a funny odor. "Don't worry about Star City, slugs" What kind of crappola is that? If you have documented evidence, you can easily post it. You haven't even told us what your connection to this case is (or more likely, what your agenda is.) You think I am reading this thread to watch your posts and read your words? Not a chance, Einstein. I enjoy conversing with the more mature, educated members of this forum. Maybe in a few more years, you will be able to do the same, without false pretense and childish banterings.

To the other posters: I am on the fence, but am still slightly more in favor of believing this case, because, as the previous poster mentions, due to the analog videotape distortion. That was one of the main points of this case that struck me right off as authentic.



posted on Feb, 14 2009 @ 12:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by visionandtruth
But concerning why Reed is still alive I wont answer that question right now. Reason why I wont answer it now is for two reasons. First - everytime I answer it people shut up and never bring up again because of how I answer it. Hopefully maybe someone else may come along and give the same logic answer I will give so I wont have to.
And secondly - I will hope others come and continue making statements concerning why they think he is still alive in regards to whether or not this would even be possible if, as they say, 'people are after him.' Which is a flawed and inaccurate statement.


Yet another nonsensical post from our esteemed colleague.
Just stop posting garbage, please. If you don't have an answer, don't make up some silly excuse why, followed by a laughing smiley.

Sorry, I do not possess the virtue of restraint (in times like these) as most other members here do. I don't mean to be rude to visionandtruth, but he is spouting lies and garbage and that should not be tolerated. When I first entered this thread, he was able to share some meaningful insight, but all of that has now been reduced to egocentric drivel.

[edit on 2/14/2009 by pjslug]



posted on Feb, 14 2009 @ 12:41 AM
link   
Hi pjslug,
As you may know, im more on the skeptic side of the fence when it comes to Reed`s story. But as I stated, if proof is presented, I have no problem changing my mind.

To be honest, Im not sure if Reed`s actual 1st generation analog video has ever been analyzed by credible video analysts because all i`ve seen are the youtube videos.

With that said, i mess around with video a little.
Here`s some food for thought.
You can take take analog tape, digitize it, then use filters in Adobe After effects to create video distortion. Then transfer back to analog tape.

As for VisionQuest, I think that I may be on his ignore list because he seems to be ignoring my questions, never giving me any answers, no matter how civil i`ve tried to be with him/her.

although, for now...I have come to the conclusion that this case is a hoax, my mind can change.
I believe if we are to have any serious answers to our questions, it more than likely will NOT come from VisionQuest.
It would have to come from someone who would know more about the specifics of the case, or might be closer to Reed (to have better evidence), someone who is more knowlegable and have more maturity during debate.


[edit on 14-2-2009 by johnjohn808]



posted on Feb, 14 2009 @ 01:57 AM
link   
reply to post by pjslug
 


pjslug writes:

"...but before you kept telling people to listen to me."

-------------------------

VisionandTruth:
Slugs that is called LYING.

Quote copy and paste where I kept telling people to listen to you.
Once you can not quote that then you will understand why I no longer respond to you. Because you have now resorted to LYING.
Take care Slug.



posted on Feb, 14 2009 @ 01:59 AM
link   
reply to post by darkclaw1256
 


Darkclaw1256 writes:
Those videos look interesting and particularly strange but in my opinion, I feel they were a hoax. I have never heard of any aliens who had brown skin. And the alien seems to look a bit peculiar. Looks a bit like a doll.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VisionTruth:
Have there ever been any dolls anywhere in the world that change colors from a bluish gray to a dark brown? If so please post a link so we can all see this demonstrated elsewhere other then in the Reed case. Thanking you in advance for that link.



posted on Feb, 14 2009 @ 02:01 AM
link   
IMPAIRED WROTE:

CGI didn't hit the shelves until about 2002-2003 with Maya, which used to be called Alias Studios.

The only CGI program that was available at the time of the video was Lightwave, but Lightwave is incredibly hard to use.

So, sorry. Gotta disagree.

Also, when he tried to film the UFO, there was distortion to the camera. The funny thing is that it was analog distortion (The camcorder was analog. Tape only). It only happened when he tried to get close or zoom in.

Very unlikely even the triangle craft was CG'd. You can tell by the way when the camera moves.
Same for the ET. Look at the damn head wound.

And from what I would speculate, maybe the incident with the dog happened, and then he ran back home, dropped the dog off (lest it would happen again), grabbed a camera, and ran back to the site. He's hyperventilating enough to have run something like that. That combined with the fear and reality of what happened, it's plausable....


------------------------------------------
VISIONTRUTH:

Great post Impaired.



new topics

top topics



 
51
<< 18  19  20    22  23  24 >>

log in

join