It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WhatTheory
1)Considering Iran is killing U.S. troops by providing money, arms and militia plus (2) all the comments from them wanting to destroy Israel, I believe it is warranted.
Iraqi officials also have accused Iran of meddling in violence and had echoed the U.S. accusations of new Iranian-made arms being found in Basra. But neither the United States nor Iraq has displayed any of the alleged arms to the public or press, and lately it is looking less likely they will. U.S. military officials said it was up to the Iraqis to show the items; Iraqi officials lately have backed off the accusations against Iran.
A plan to show some [alleged Iranian-supplied explosives to journalists last week in Karbala and then destroy them was canceled after the United States realized none of them was from Iran. A U.S. military spokesman attributed the confusion to a misunderstanding that emerged after an Iraqi Army general in Karbala erroneously reported the items were of Iranian origin.
When U.S. explosives experts went to investigate, they discovered they were not Iranian after all.
WASHINGTON — Despite President Bush's claims that Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons that could trigger "World War III," experts in and out of government say there's no conclusive evidence that Tehran has an active nuclear-weapons program.
Even his own administration appears divided about the immediacy of the threat. While Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney speak of an Iranian weapons program as a fact, Bush's point man on Iran, Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns, has attempted to ratchet down the rhetoric.
****SKIP****
If conclusive proof exists, however, Bush hasn't revealed it. Nor have four years of IAEA inspections.
"I have not received any information that there is a concrete active nuclear-weapons program going on right now," IAEA Director General Mohamed ElBaradei asserted in an interview Oct. 31 with CNN.
Originally posted by mybigunit
We gave the Taliban weapons when the soviets invaded in the 80s. Did the Soviets come and nuke us? Did we nuke the Soviets when they gave weapons to N Vietnam?
Dont believe everything bush tells you and if you want to then just do me a favor salute accordingly.
Originally posted by bringthelight
the one shred of evidence that the US thought they had when it came to Iran providing weapons turned out to be completely false and they had to cancel their press conference! i wonder who Whattheory works for?
Weapons were not iranian
Originally posted by mybigunit
I was going to go through all that but when he didnt know what I meant by we giving taliban weapons to fight the soviets and the soviets giving the N Vietnamese weapons I knew I was arguing with someone who clearly doesnt know what hes talking about so I gave up
Originally posted by WhatTheory
reply to post by Keyhole
You should take your head out of the sand more often. The evidence is there but you choose not to believe it. Of course I could post articles stating just the opposite of what you posted but what's the point? You would not believe it anyway. Its really funny when one obscure article comes along and all the fanatics grab hold of it and insist that this one little lonely article is more credible than the numerous others to the contrary.
Originally posted by mybigunit
Like the evidence of the WMDs in Iraq? WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE!!!!!
Originally posted by mybigunit
Like the evidence of the WMDs in Iraq? WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE!!!!!
The only evidence you are going on is what bushy is telling you. Dont be a sheeple think for yourself please
Originally posted by WhatTheory
Looks like the time is close before something happens to Iran. I believe it is necessary to curb their plans on building nuclear weapons. Ahmadinejad is a loose cannon and cannot be trusted especially given their actions and rhetoric.
www.reuters.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by bringthelight
So what do you suggest? Should we start another war with another country
or impose our will on them because they "might" have some nukes 10 years down the road?
Yeah lets spend a few more billion, loose thousands of more lives, no biggie.
You gonna go sign up to fight?
Originally posted by mybigunit
hehe touche there ya go I was holding that card I didnt want to bring it out yet but thanks for doing it for me. Im sure they didnt do the dog and pony show this time around because a big Made In The USA logo or Made In Russia Logo...keep in mind some of these guys are fighting us with weapons we gave them 20 years ago.
Originally posted by Memysabu
I dunno I say we let Israel and Iran go at it. Why does anyone else need to get in? Theyve been happy killing eachother for thousands of years why bother now?