reply to post by RomanMaroni
I am familiar with Lavon affair, and trust me - i am not proud of it. By far.
And it is ok to question and even be suspicious. But there are a lot of distorted facts, and distorted on purpose. From this thread alone:
The New York Times reported Thursday that a group of five men had set up video cameras aimed at the Twin Towers prior to the attack on Tuesday

Nobody said "prior to the attack" and yet it is here.
2. One of them, or an accomplice, then calls a 9-1-1 police dispatcher to report Palestinian bomb-makers in a white van headed for the Holland Tunnel.

How can anyone know who called?
discovery of a van full of explosives and two suspects located between 6th and 17th on King Street, some blocks away from the WTC.

Can you tell me why "van packed with explosives" and not "dogs sniffed traces of explosives" as in reality? Oh, Israelis...van....
Our purpose for being (in NYC) was to document the event" for Israel.

While the narrator says - "our purpose was to document". See how
"for being in NYC" is entered from the blue?
This is all from the first page. A lot of other ...hmmm.... "distorted" info follows.
You see now why i am not sure that it is questioning or even suspecting but painting target using cheap tricks?
I can understand questioning of what Odigo, i can understand questioning why moving company manager left US for Israel in such a hurry (though it
might be simple business decision). I am all for real search for truth. But when you take all the examples above, add "mossad" agent thrown at every
Israeli involved, 4000 Israelis trick and all similar stuff - sorry, i do not see it as a search for truth.
And finally, for gain vs loss. What Israel "gained" - more support? But in case of "loss" we would loose everything,maybe even independance. What
idiot ,heavy moral issues and ally stuff aside, would give the order for such operation when lately all i here is how our "uninvincible" mossad guys
get sloppy all around the world.
Edit - A conspiracy!!!

I did not write "Indigo".. Maybe spell checker having fun?
[edit on 20-6-2008 by ZeroKnowledge]