google couldn't zoom any closer in the satellite pic. ??
[edit on 26-8-2008 by seagrass]

Originally posted by KTK
reply to post by Skyfloating
Maybe I should get of my bum and check some of these places out.
In August 1914, Professor M.A. Gonzales was excavating Mayan ruins in the city of Acajutla, in Mexico. The two illustrated statuettes were uncovered. On the male, the headdress, the beard, and the cartouche are all typically Egyptian in style. The male is thought to represent Osiris, the female Isis. (Thompson, Gunnar; "Egyptian Statuettes in Mexico," Ancient American, 2:12, no. 8, 1995.)

Before I show you this hidden geometry, which I call the "Da Vinci Star", I will draw your attention to the two six-pointed stars at the upper left and right of the print which represent what were thought at the time to be two new stars being born in 1604 and 1600, respectively. These were actually a supernova (1604) and a nova-like outburst of a variable star (1600). The left star represents the supernova in the constellation Ophiuchus, "The Serpent Holder", as clearly shown by the figure of a man holding a serpent right beneath it. Discovered on October 11, 1604, and visible for about 18 months, this was known then as "Kepler's Star" and today as SN 1604. The right star represents a variable star in the constellation Cygnus, "The Swan" (as indicated by the figure of a swan beneath it), also called "The Northern Cross". This star is now known as P Cygni. It experienced a nova-like outburst on August 8, 1600 which was visible for several years.
These two stars were believed by the Rosicrucians to herald something of great significance. This was mentioned in the Confessio Fraternitatis (which is easy to find in a web search) in this quote: "yea, the Lord God hath already sent before certain messengers, which should testify his will, to wit, some new stars, which do appear and are seen in the firmament in Serpentano and Cygno, which signify and give themselves known to everyone, that they are powerful Signacula of great weighty matters".
In 1994, Italian journalist Enza Massa was at the Italian National Library in Rome when she stumbled upon an unusual find. It was a manuscript dating to 1629, titled: Nostradamus Vatinicia Code. Michel de Notredame, the author's name, was on the inside in indelible ink. The book contains cryptic and bizarre images along with over eighty watercolor paintings by the master visionary himself. Follow the investigative trail of how the manuscript was found in the archives and exactly how it got there. New insight is given into the life of Nostradamus and his relationship with Pope Urban VIII, who knew about this manuscript and in whose possession it was for many years.



Originally posted by destiny-fateyes. I think they are completely different. I think the "normal" snake is used in association with other symbols to represent some kind of concept. The snake with the foot and column is interesting because the measurements used to build the columns and temples were based on the human body. To have the snake there is odd. Almost as if the snake determined that we would use those measurements. Perhaps that's how they taught us measurement.??
reply to post by seagrass
Did you think the Rainbow Dragon ( plate 18 ) and the snake depictions (plates 56 & 64 ) were of two totally different archetypal references or "species" ?
[edit on 30-8-2008 by destiny-fate]

Originally posted by destiny-fateI found this...
reply to post by seagrass
Yes I agree with you - so if we look at Plate 18
Do you think the spiral tail encircling the stars could represent a galaxy - and if so - the question that comes to mind is : Do all galaxies spin counterclockwise ??
[edit on 31-8-2008 by destiny-fate]
Cornell I accidentally, stupidly, deleted the pyramid google pics. Do you all want me to repost them. I get delete happy, obsessive cleaning thing I guess.
Does the Milky Way spin counter-clockwise? If so, do all spiral galaxies spin in this direction and why? When I see depictions of the Milky Way it appears that the objects within it move counter-clockwise. Is this accurate? If so, do all spiral galaxies spin in this direction and why? The direction that the Milky Way spins depends on your perspective. For example, take a top and spin it clockwise on a glass table. Then look at the spinning top from below the glass table - it will appear to spin counter-clockwise now. Or similarly, draw an arrow on a piece of paper in the clockwise direction, then hold the paper up to a light, looking at it from the bottom - now the arrow goes in the counter-clockwise direction. Thus the direction of the spin of any galaxy depends on your perspective when you look at it. Scientists believe that on large scales the Universe is isotropic (the same in all directions). Thus, from our perspective, half of all spiral galaxies should spin clockwise, and half counter-clockwise. A recent analysis of the spin of spiral galaxies confirms this. The public classified over 35,000 spiral galaxies with spins both clockwise and counter-clockwise in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey as part of the Galaxy Zoo project. Scientists published the results in a recent paper and found that the Universe is indeed isotropic - we see the same number of clockwise as counter-clockwise spirals (within the uncertainties).
In the southwest 'hillcountry' region of Texas, lies the powerful and sacred dome of Enchanted Rock. Visible for miles around, the impressive dome rises 1850 feet above sea level, some 450 feet vertically above base. Revered by the planes Indians for centuries, it spirals a potent electrical vortex. It is called the Ayers Rock of America. Enchanted Rock is indeed one of the most powerful points in the southwest, and holds a special relationship to Sedona, and indeed, Ayers Rock.