Three words people don't seem to like very much: , page 1


Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 16 times
Topic started on 15-5-2008 @ 11:11 PM by AceWombat04
"I don't know."

This website’s credo is one that I and many others admire greatly: “Deny Ignorance.” I couldn’t agree more with it, either. However, it occurred to me today while thinking about some things that there is a difference between denying ignorance (working toward enlightenment and educating oneself,) and not admitting to being ignorant in the first place. It is therefore my aspiration, however often I may fail in the pursuit of it, never to fear or refrain from admitting my own ignorance.

I am ignorant. No matter how much I become privileged to learn in life, there still lays before my senses, somewhere out there, the vastness of the universe teeming with unknown variables, possibilities, and phenomena. Moreover, no matter how much I come to believe I know, there will always remain some particle, however minute, of doubt or detracting variable that is at least potentially contrary to that knowledge.

In short, in the grand scheme of things (if there is such a thing,) I know – and indeed, may have only the capacity to know – next to nothing.

The reason I feel compelled to make this, what I feel should be a rather obvious admission, is because all too often I experience a conversation much like many others I’ve had in my life that go roughly something like this:

Friend: But you do know that ___________ is true, right?
Me: Well, I don’t know. Let me think about that for a bit before I respond.
Friend: What is there to think about? It’s obvious! How can you even contemplate disagreeing?
Me: Well it might be obvious, but I still need to think about it before replying.
Friend: There’s nothing to think about! It’s outrageous that you would even have to hesitate before answering.

I wrote that reality-based yet nonetheless fictitious conversation with the aim of being as general as possible. You can fill in the blank with a scientific fact, religious ideology, ethical viewpoint, belief, feeling, or political stance of your choice. The point is that, quite often, people are actually derided for thinking, rather than acquiescing.

Often, saying “I don’t know” is regarded as cause to perceive the person saying it as ignorant. My questions are thus:

1) Wouldn’t it be ignorant for a thinking person to accept, without thought, a statement as fact or truth without discovering that truth for themselves first?
2) Isn’t it equally ignorant to judge someone harshly for taking the time to do something we humans have a great capacity for doing when we put our minds to it: think?

I may be less informed or less knowledgeable for being unwilling to commit fully to certain things without educating myself about them first hand, or for trying to keep an open mind, but I never want to lose the ability to admit my own ignorance, and I find it disheartening when my friends or others (not necessarily on ATS but I believe it can happen anywhere) seem literally appalled at my determination to say the simple phrase, "I don't know."

I didn’t write this about ATS or its community specifically. I’m posting it here because I felt that it applies to any community where conversation and debate occurs routinely. It is, as always, only a personal opinion and is not intended to force a belief or viewpoint on anyone, or to judge those who hold differing views. I respect everyone’s opinion, which is one reason for bringing this up.

Sometimes, ironically, being open minded means admitting personal ignorance.

[edit on 5/15/2008 by AceWombat04]


reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 01:07 AM by WraothAscendant
reply to post by AceWombat04



Great post.
Star and flag.
If only more people could be THAT honest with themselves and everyone else. And gods know I have slipped up but I like to think I have always corrected that.


Friend: But you do know that ___________ is true, right?
Me: Well, I don’t know. Let me think about that for a bit before I respond.
Friend: What is there to think about? It’s obvious! How can you even contemplate disagreeing?
Me: Well it might be obvious, but I still need to think about it before replying.
Friend: There’s nothing to think about! It’s outrageous that you would even have to hesitate before answering.


hEh sounds like an excert from the 9/11 forums.

With insults added in.

[edit on 16-5-2008 by WraothAscendant]


reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 06:42 PM by AceWombat04
Originally posted by nerbot
Four words to always use instead of "I don't know."

"I don't know, but...."

Answers start with an idea not a full stop.

[edit on 16/5/2008 by nerbot]


Excellent point. That actually gets to the heart of what I'm saying in a far more succinct fashion than my post. Admitting my own ignorance should be accompanied by the hope that I can lessen it over time and discover answers to the questions life presents me with. What I was really trying to say was that even once I've learned something, however, I also hope to maintain the capacity to leave my mind open to the possibility that it could be incorrect, and to always leave room for thought rather than allowing my mind to become completely reliant on accepted facts, so that there is still room for possibility, the unknown, and a measure of humility before the infinite universe that surrounds me as compared to my capacity to comprehend it.

I might say things like (to finish the sentence you began,) "I don't know, but I think ___________," or in some cases perhaps, “I don’t know, but I would like to believe ________.” The latter is one I find myself using a lot actually, because my beliefs (or my aspirations toward beliefs) are always changing with each lesson I learn (or think that I’ve learned.)

In many instances in my life (though far less on ATS than in my daily life,) I (and I've seen examples of this beyond myself as well) have actually gotten criticized by people for wanting to reserve judgment and actually ponder and think before answering or responding to a question or giving my two cents on a particular subject. I have a lot of trouble committing to the act of responding with "Yes, absolutely," or, "No, absolutely not," without at least thinking about a question thoroughly. Sometimes the answers aren't immediate enough, and I have to take a lot of time and do research before I can give an honest answer. Even then, sometimes I end up with an open-ended lack of definitive knowledge. Sometimes definitive answers just aren't forthcoming (yet!) Other times I do have a firm personal opinion or feeling, but don't feel justified in declaring it definitively true because in the end it's only my opinion or an emotion in reaction to something (saddness in reaction to a specific political policy for instance, with which others agree; in that instance I have a well formed personal view, but remain unconvinced that mine is more correct than that of others.)

Interestingly enough, that choice itself (to think before responding) often gets criticized. It creates a sense of peer pressure, at times, to have a ready answer for everything, rather than admitting that I honestly don't know.

That's really what I was getting at. I agree, however, that one should never stop trying to find the answer, if ones goal is to "deny ignorance." I hope this made some sense. We're having a heat wave here (by our standards) and I'm about to topple over so any incoherence can probably be blamed on that.

[edit on 5/16/2008 by AceWombat04]
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Dumbing down reality
  Posted 5 days ago with 103 member flags
The 800 Pound Gorilla Everyone Ignores
  Posted 16 days ago with 67 member flags
The Illusion of Choice and Truth
  Posted 10 days ago with 52 member flags
A chronical of the BANKSTER WARS
  Posted 7 days ago with 42 member flags
Conspiracy Theory:The Lost Episode
  Posted 4 days ago with 39 member flags
666, NWO, Aliens and You!
  Posted 13 days ago with 36 member flags