It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UFO Busters

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 15 2008 @ 09:19 PM
link   
Since ATS is a very large forum, I invite all ATS members to post the conclusion of all UFO cases inside ATS (or outside even), for easy access.

Just like Mythbusters the conclusion can be busted, plausible, confirmed (although I don't think this one would be used
). And I also want to add another option which is ongoing, for cases that you consider important and deserve special attention.

The thread obviously will be leaning toward busted, and please provide the explanation and the link for the case.


Example:

Case: UFO over Haiti
Date: ??
Videos/Images:

Status: Busted
Explanation: CGI hoax
Link: [HOAX] Haiti UFO Video - YouTube - [HOAX]


Okay, I'll add another one

Case: Isaac CARET - Drones
Date: ??
Videos/Images:

Status: Busted
Explanation: CGI hoax
Link: [HOAX] Isaac CARET - Drones [HOAX]

Keep the thread neat and also provide the date if you know the date. Thank you.


Jazz


edit: video and add

Let me emphasize

This isn't about determining which case is busted or not. Discussion about the case should be in the corresponding thread and not here. This is about posting that has already been confirmed as busted and some plausible cases.

Of course the case will be updated if the conclusion changes due to new findings or other circumstances. And if the case is important but hasn't reached any conclusion, the status should be 'Ongoing'.


[edit on Fri, 16 May 08 by Jazzyguy]




posted on May, 15 2008 @ 10:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jazzyguy
Just like Mythbusters the conclusion can be busted, plausible, confirmed (although I don't think this one would be used
). And I also want to add another option which is ongoing, for cases that you consider important and deserve special attention.

The thread obviously will be leaning toward busted, and please provide the explanation and the link for the case.


What criteria would you be using to declare a sighting or case busted, plausible, or confirmed?

Leaning towards busted suggests an inherit bias. What is needed is on objective outlook, one that is leaning towards neither busted nor confirmed.



posted on May, 15 2008 @ 10:53 PM
link   
That would be nice, but last night i had one of those alien invasion type dreams whereby goliath-sized space vehicles (the type the military haven't built) were passing over our cities.

The space vehicle's under-array was made up of several hundred lights in the colours of red, yellow, blue and green - and each one of these lights was capable of launching an energy attack capable of destroying a single building with relative ease - the actual assault i witnessed (in my dream) was localised, so i'm thinking perhaps those lights are also sensors of some kind, to be used for detecting dangerous weapons.

I also dreamt of how human society - those of us who are not in the military and possess no civil function, would deal with that type of invasion.

Less panic than one would think, believe it or not.

Anwho, JazzyGuy; It's probably best if you use this thread as a prototype, because at least that way people will have some idea of how this is going to work out.



posted on May, 15 2008 @ 11:00 PM
link   
reply to post by SaviorComplex
 

Not me, us. The thread will lean toward the obvious busted case, just like the example. This isn't about determining which case is busted or not. Discussion about the case should be in the corresponding thread and not here. This is about posting that has already been confirmed as busted and some plausible cases.

Of course the case will be updated if the conclusion changes due to new findings or other circumstances. And if the case is important but hasn't reached any conclusion, the status should be 'Ongoing'.


reply to post by Anti-Tyrant
 

Are you going to open a thread about that dream of yours?

Actually this is a prototype. If it works, a mod eventually will have to take over.

[edit on Thu, 15 May 08 by Jazzyguy]



posted on May, 15 2008 @ 11:36 PM
link   
Nah mate, a dreams a dream - if it actually has any relevance then it's in the place where it's needed most; in my mind.

I just felt like writing down what i remembered somewhere, to keep it fresh in my head.

Good work on the prototype btw.




posted on May, 24 2009 @ 01:25 AM
link   
Since now there's a HOAX forum, I'm just gonna use this thread for personal use and opinion.


UFOs Over Edwards Air Force Base





It's plausible for me, and I like this case a lot, hence I made the thread.

 


Trumbull County Ohio UFO



One of my top five favorite, it's up close and personal and also a mass sighting.



posted on May, 26 2009 @ 12:02 AM
link   
They are completely annoying with their ET origin suppositions
with every other breath.

They must be afraid of Cheney or the OSI.



posted on May, 26 2009 @ 02:34 PM
link   
reply to post by Jazzyguy
 



Trumbull County Ohio UFO


UFO in Trumbull County Ohio 1994 Part [02/03]
www.youtube.com...



Tesla made these things years ago, just because our Illuminati controllers have them makes everyone that didn't see the ships liars.



posted on May, 26 2009 @ 08:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
They are completely annoying with their ET origin suppositions
with every other breath.

They must be afraid of Cheney or the OSI.


Who are you talking about here? Who are they?



Originally posted by TeslaandLyne


Tesla made these things years ago, just because our Illuminati controllers have them makes everyone that didn't see the ships liars.

I'm gonna need the link to the source. I don't know whether Testla has invented an anti gravity engine. I'm gonna need more info if that's the case. Thanks.



posted on May, 27 2009 @ 11:43 PM
link   
They: the UFO Hunters.
I heard a lot of ET injection.
Not to my liking but who cares when dealing with pseudo science
and the pseudo history makers, the Illuminati have trained us well
to accept almost anything.

The Tesla anti gravity comes directly from high frequency that
pushes against the air (composed of gases with electrically active
mush... plus and negative charges) that surrounds the earth.
The forces cause levitation, hover and movement in the air.

Without the air perhaps no anti gravity from Tesla, however
the AC in wires was a snap for Tesla, as many experimenters
knew of the Faraday loop and AC did exist experimentally,
but the big build at Niagara put Tesla with the Illuminati of his
era. The AC for the wireless transmission pushes and supports
his craft. In the cylinder craft I think the front transmits the
aft as wave oscillations surrounding that type of craft have
been observed. The Tesla Tower would have powered the UFO
craft of today and well as his Teleforce proposal to the US
government. His wireless patents say they will power craft
in the air.

Tesla did make the ships and he said they worked as printed
in newsprint of the time when there was a comment directed
at a failure in his design.
I'm still looking for many more text that describe the action
of the craft like it is lifted by a pulling force.
Any Tesla researcher might fill us in there.

Sorry no source as Illuminati agents keep it off the internet.
Information on Tesla was taken away by the Illuminati since 1947 as
if locking all of Tesla documents on gravity in 1943 wasn't
enough.
Agents would trace what is left and prevent the further publication.
Sort of a catch 22, so further understand might have to be
taken up on your own intuitive.

Some people claim to have collected much of the text available
but there might be more than a collection to think Tesla did
anything after Niagara.



posted on May, 28 2009 @ 12:26 AM
link   
reply to post by TeslaandLyne
 

Are you talking about the lifter technology, such as the one in this video?



How about artificial gravity technology, did tesla ever invent such a thing?
It'll be very useful so people will be able to do stuff normally (in normal gravity) in outer space.



posted on May, 28 2009 @ 01:14 AM
link   
Ok if this works right, you can see this is someone taking picture of water, pond things floating and saying it's infrared of UFO

edit
Yea I never used that embed before not sure how it works, plus have head ache. Anyhow that's the(Infrared UFO Fleet in Norway) Thread it's in Aliens and UFO Forum.
Anyhow if you look at it you can see is joke, people will believe anything.

I will try and reembed or go check it out.


[edit on 28-5-2009 by googolplex]



posted on May, 28 2009 @ 11:44 AM
link   
reply to post by Jazzyguy
 


I've seen that exposed as ion flow and other explanations.
I'd have to check what a Tesla group had to say but I'd say
its close to what Tesla did if high voltage and high frequency
is involved.

Gravity gets less and less far away from the gravitating body
thus anti gravity has been deemed useless in outed space travel.

Propulsion in outer space where there is nothing makes having
something like all pervasive aether that remained in bulbs evacuated
of air in Tesla's lab and still reacted to the push of high electrical
potentials of high frequency an important consideration.

I'd say that the proponents of the Tesla UFO think the propulsion
is more than pushing aether as in his wireless transmission of
electricity and in an accumulation of electrons around the craft.
AC of high potential and high frequency is one way, not like
AC at 60 cps and lower cps, and thus can draw in electrons.
I's say that some of the observational effects can be a dark UFO
due to air giving off violet light from being hit by electrons and
also the electrostatic light ball from an influx of electrons.

We know UFOs can go around in the air whether Tesla UFOs
or not. If the Tesla way works then there is a chance his
saucer design is the UFO we see. We do not know if this
design works is extremely rarefied or pure aether although
Tesla made bulbs glow that had little air inside.

I see a problem with the bulb as Tesla put a coil in oil to
show agitation at the surface. Tesla said the agitation at the oil
surface is from the compressible air being agitated and not the incompressible oil. The aether may take millions of volts and
millions of cps to react for propulsion. There is thought that the
aether might be torn apart just to get more negative charge.
However we can only speculate of outer space performance.

Outer Space still has gigantic vastness, little gravity, Kelvin
zero temperatures and high speed Cosmic particles shot from
stars producing high radiation levels as obstacles to over come.



new topics

top topics



 
2

log in

join