reply to post by Howie47
We are not under the old law, and that law is not divisible into moral and ritual or symbolic laws...
I will not presume to call you a false teacher in the way you have me. The confusion you have on this issue is not uncommon.
The ceremonial Law - the types and symbols (laws on food, clothing, etc.) ceremonies and sacrifices all pointed forward to Christ and are therefore
fulfilled and no longer valid.
The moral Law still stands - not so we can try and make ourselves righteous, but so we can know how to live God's way, to thank Him for His
forgiveness through the Gospel. This is the freedom we are under in the New Covenant - those who are truly born again have no fear of not being good
enough for God to accept them.
You said, on page 3 of this thread:
Christian's are no longer under the old law, even the 10 commandments.
Let us therefore examine the force of your position on this matter. According to your clearly-stated position Christians are not commanded and obliged
by God to:
1) Have no Gods before the Lord.
Consequently they are free to worship other Gods.
2) Not make or worship idols.
Consequently they can make or worship idols.
3) Not misuse the name of the Lord God.
Consequently they can misuse God's name.
4) Keep one day out of seven holy.
Consequently there is no need for a day of rest and worship.
5) Honour their father and mother.
Consequently they can dishonour and disobey their parents.
6) Not murder.
Consequently they can commit murder.
7) Not commit adultery.
Consequently they can commit sexual sin.
8) Not steal.
Consequently they can steal.
9) Not bear false testimony.
Consequently they can lie.
10) Not covet other people's house or wife.
Consequently they can covet other people's house or wife.
You have just added a post to say
The commandments are a pretty good guide
Guidelines are guides, but can be ignored; commandments are laws requiring consequences for the lawbreaker. Anyone who says Christians can break the
ten commandments with impunity is teaching their own ideas, not the Bible. God therefore
disciplines believers who foolishly err, but sincerely
repent - cf. David and Hebrews 12:6.
Those who are born again delight in the commandments and find great joy in seeking to worship God through keeping them from the heart. It is called
sanctification.
I fear one reason you hold on to the idea that they are no longer valid is because you agree with consequence no.7 - you seek to justify sex outside a
male-female marriage.
Your position is
a) internally inconsistent - firstly you say Christians are not under God's Law, even the 10 commandments, then you imply we need them.
b) externally inconsistent with what Christ and the apostles taught:
Jesus in Matthew 5:17a:
Do not think that I came to abolish the Law...
...God who will justify the circumcised by faith and the uncircumcised through faith is one [i.e. Jew & Gentile are forgiven and accepted through
faith in the Cross of Christ]. Do we then nullify the Law through faith? May it never be! On the contrary, we establish the Law
Romans 3:29-31
Paul is saying that Christians keep the Mosaic moral Law of God because they love God who has redeemed them - it is
established in the New
Covenant era because Christians keep it through the power of the Holy Spirit (not perfectly, but according to the extent they live by the Spirit).
Your confusion has arisen because the Scriptures teach that we no longer need outward symbols like circumcision (being born again is circumcision of
the heart) and avoiding foodstuffs and leaven (because we avoid sinful activities and turn away from sin in the heart).
You have also shown confusion over the issue Paul had with Peter. It was very simple: Peter was reverting to keeping Jewish customs - i.e. the
ceremonial laws. He was discriminating between those outwardly circumcised and those who were not. Paul had to remind him that these had been
fulfilled and abolished.
Peter's vision also related to foods now being clean, but the deeper meaning is given in the context: God now accepts those who believe the Gospel
and turn from lawless behaviour (i.e. repentance), even Gentiles. That is why he received the vision before being sent to preach to Gentiles (who
already believed in God!) but whom Peter would have separated himself from as ceremonially unclean under the Old Covenant.
Also Paul said if you are under any part of the old law, then you must keep it all!
Look at the context: he was saying 'Those who circumcise themselves have to keep all the laws about how to wash, dress, cut their hair, and even
perform sacrifices! We have been freed from that: Christ has fulfilled the symbols and we no longer need them. We now live in the reality.
Is the Mosaic moral Law abrogated, as you suggest? No - as Paul (and Christ!) make clear - it stands and is established by Christian living.
As to what you say about us living by laws not written down, I know what you are saying: we are motivated and guided by the commandment to love God
and our fellow human beings. But this is not in conflict with God's moral law - it leads to us fulfilling it!
You specifically asked about the fourth commandment. Yes, how we keep it now is viewed in different ways, and it does at first sight appear
anachronistic. But listen to what Christ said:
...whoever breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches people to do so will be called least in the kingdom of Heaven.
Gospel of Matthew 5:19
Did He also say anything about how long they are valid? -
I assure you: Until Heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or one stroke of a letter will pass from the Law...
You made an assertion about 'self-righteous' Christians. If you read my posts you will only find me referring to myself as a sinner, a forgiven
sinner, an abject sinner, a sinner like the next man. Your implication that teaching repentance from homosexual sin means we lack mercy is as
unbiblical as saying teaching repentance from adultery shows a lack of mercy.
You claim to live under God's grace. Do you have the grace to reconsider your position?
[edited punctuation]
[edit on 18/5/08 by pause4thought]