Why Have All of These Infamous Zionists/Nazis Changed Their Names?

Why do you think so many mass-murderers (such as some of the most infamous Nazis/Zionists) have changed their names?

 blogs.albawaba.com...

The Bizarre Story Of An Austrian named Hitler, Grandson of Baron Rothschild, and other "name changers"

Well, after looking over some references on Project Paperclip, it should become obvious why so many names were changed after WW II. For one thing, the Nuremburg Trials were only a media circus, so that the US could let these @$$wipes just continue with "business as usual."

The only differences were that they'd have the US government as bosses & they were given the opportunity to re-establish the Third Reich in America...Does there seem to be a lot of "coincidence" that the US government has been following the same path as Hitler took to gain power in Germany?

On November 30th 2000, Rothschild got married in London to a wealthy Zionist business woman named Lynn Forrester.


The Forbes part of John Kerry identifies his descendancy from Captain Robert Bennett Forbes, who was a drug runner for the Rothschild’s opium drug trade with china in the eighteen hundreds.

Oh what a thread!!! Zionists are both Nazis and Communists.... At least think if such a chimera is possible before drawing any conclusions. I think that if people will try hard enough they will find that Zionists were also part of Inquisition - after all Torqwemada is supposed to have name changed too.
As for minor details named facts -


Koba was nickname that he used in political/criminal activity. He took it from novel , it is Georgian Robin Hood analog. But if it sounds Jewish - why not add it to the pile.


Lenin was changed from Ulyanov. If his Grandfather on MOTHER side was Blank - how it means that Lenin should be Blank? In Russia as in majority of the globe father family name is given. But as long as it can be used to stir certain response - everything goes.
Since i simply do not know about the rest of fine examples of human intellect - i guess it probably is the same rubbish.
Trotsky - Zionist. Great Joke. Communism stated that different nationalities should not exist. Zionism is national movement.
I wonder why this "zionist" that did change name from Bronstein is not mentioned? Maybe because he DID change names? So compilers of this info did not enter him due to it being ,God forbid, truth.
And why none of this Communist Zionists ended up in Israel? Or Palestine at that time....

reply to post by ZeroKnowledge

---

Wake up. All of the infamous Zionists are Nazis.
Jim Condit - The Final Solution to Adolf Hitler (Adolph Hitler)

Google Video Link

Hitler & the Zionists part 1 of 2

YouTube Link

Hitler & the Zionists part 2 of 2

YouTube Link

Zionist Founder Theodore Herzl was a German Fascist Nazi

YouTube Link

This shows how Zionists Invaded deep into our Government

YouTube Link

911 Was a Zionist Job 01 of 02


911 Was a Zionist Job 02 of 02

YouTube Link

[edit on 15-5-2008 by RamboGoneWild]

Let's not forget that the Khazarian Zionists are not Jews...They wanted to misdirect blame for the "Jewish Conspiracy" away from themselves & have been quite successful in doing so. Just consider how many different nations have mistakenly persecuted the Jews (the real Jewish heritage descended from Semite stock) in history. The current general population of Isreal is Jewish (practicing Judaism), but the ruling powers are Khazarian (Jesuits). BTW, the so-called "Cardinal" advisor in the US government is also Khazarian, not a true Jew.

This Khazarian (simplified) "chain of command" passes through the Catholic Church in the Vatican & Knights of Malta all the way to the Superior General of the Jesuits, also known as the Black Pope. If any single person in the world would most aptly fit the title of "Anti-Christ," it would be him.

Granted, this info has only one source (after all, how many people would be willing & able to reveal that much ), but everything at this link logically fits into a cohesive whole.

[edit on 15-5-2008 by MidnightDStroyer]

reply to post by MidnightDStroyer

---

You are aware that you are wrong, now don't you? Jew is also person converted to Judaism. He/she are no longer refered as converts but are considered full members of Jewish society. Of course xenophobia plays its role here too but at least the definition is as i mentioned.
King David is grandson of converted women for example.
And how can you differentiate between "khazarian" Jew to "other" Jew?
Also...Jesuits. I must congratulate you -THIS i see for the first time. So:
Can you pinpoint on the map where Khazaria was? Then try to measure distance to Italy. Khazar Kaganate fell in 965 AD. Jesuits appeared in 1534. It took 600 years to those "false" Jews to reach Italy? And i am puzzled why you have to "wait" 1534 years to declare that Jews infiltrated Vatican. Most early Christian were Jews - start from there.
If one would think logically he would really see how it fits ... like a glove. But as always facts are minor problem. So lets overlook them.
If you are really interested - you can check modern genetic researches concerning different genetic markers and what can be learned about Jews of "different" origin. But since it will not fit too into your theory - why mention those facts .....

It sounds like you're making same mistake that many other people make: Jews are of Semite (the region of Mesopotamia) ancestry & is a matter of racial stock...Judaism is a religious system of belief, not related to ancestry. Anyone can convert to Judaism religion, but no one can convert to Jewish ancestry.


The Khazars do not originate from Semite stock...The nomadic steppe Khazars originate from Turko/Mongolic ancestry. The Khazars "adopted" the name of "Jew" in order to deflect suspicion towards the much-more-numerous Judaist Jews.


Khazarian Historic Maps


Before the time of Jesus there were already several subsets of Judaism developing, basically breaking away from mainstream Judaism in much the same way as the more modern Reformation of the Catholic Church happened, creating the Protestant religions.

In the book, "The Mystery and Meaning of the Dead Sea Scrolls" by Hershel Shanks (the book can also be found at Amazon.com) relates how, if Jesus actually existed, probably visited & studied at Wadi Qumran during his time "wandering the desert"...Which is where most of the Dead Sea Scrolls were stored & studied before social upheaval forced them to be hidden in various places around the Dead Sea. The Dead Sea Scrolls taught mostly one subset version of Judaism that most closely resembled Essen-Judaism (described in the book as "essen-oid," as it had some differences significant enough to "reclassify" it)...That's the most likely origin of modern Christianity.

Yes, I do have my own personal history library at home, limited though it is...And mostly focusing on Egypt.

Jesuits were originally founded by St. Ignatus Loyola, I think sometime during the 15th Century...But it's the Khazars that dominate the Jesuits now. As a religious sect that wasn't very large during the time period, it takes time to slowly & stealthily build up position & influence within the Catholic hierarchy. I'm not exaclty certain when the Khazars actually adopted the Protocols of Zion though.

reply to post by RamboGoneWild

---

Lucky I didnt see Lettermans name there. I Couldnt live with out the late show..

On a serious note, this doesnt surprise me. More corruption, using religion to cover it.

[edit on 16-5-2008 by q_ball]

Zionists and Nazis are one and the same.

Holocaust + 9/11 were both inside jobs, self-sabotage

reply to post by MidnightDStroyer

---

OK. Jew is a person who:
Is born to Jewish mother.
Is converted to Judaism.
This is how it is defined by Jews them self and trying to convince them (me including) that it is wrong is weird. I am not defining who is Slavic, Aryan or whatever. This is up to people of those races to define. Not to mention that even if someone will try to find a "clear" race for some weird reason - it is impossible in modern world because genetically all people are different. There are common genetic markers that are used to help define history of any ethnic group but it is still defined by people which markers are of which group and people could be wrong.

There is no such thing as "clear" Jewish race because converts were almost from the start. You can see from the bible that in exodus from Egypt there were not only Jews but a multitude of other nationalities too. In the history of Jewish kingdoms the were conversions too (and some in crusade-style) . In the time of Roman empire at some point almost ten percent of its population were Jewish - due to massive conversion trend. Khazar Kaganate is not the only country during the history to convert to Judaism. Why it is such a big deal then? So far i saw no proof but general declarations without any facts and explanations. Why would those evil Khazars mask them self as Jews for so long (unless it is because they consider themself Jews)? Why would they infiltrate Vatican if they mask/consider themself as Jews?

I can suggest you a new,upgraded theory:
Khazar Kaganate were really reptilians masking as people, and so took Judaism and secretly assassinated all real Jews. Then they planned (in famous Protocols of Reptilians it is all written ) to take over Christianity in the same manner - to take form of real Christians - the Jesuits - and rule other the world. Failing to do so due to Reformism movements they slitted to two groups - one creating NWO, the other bringing planet X to crash/invade Earth.
Wow. I am amazed at my work. So many facts ,time and sweat invested.... About two minutes. And look at that theory. Brilliant.
To all the people who want to use it - it is copyrighted by me!!!! I now can wright books, publish rubbish at Internet sites and ctr. And then of course - take over the world!!!!!

At least I provided some sources to go along with my own general historical research...Where's the sources that led you to formulate your theory?

BTW, your theory can't be copyrighted because it's not all that original...

reply to post by MidnightDStroyer

---

I am a little depressed because i just deleted my own huge post. And that dreams of fame and fortune with the copyright issue are gone.

So i will try to rewrite:
I consider that in order to turn assumption that Khazars are Jesuits into theory needs names of Jews (since it is impossible to know what origin they were - Eastern European is preferable) who held big positions in Jesuit group. And btw, your source also states that Jesuits appeared in 16th, not 15n century. Right now it is just an assumption with the same hold on the ground as mine (or not mine as it turned out :lol.
If you would like to check a real research:
www.nature.com...

And another logical bump in your assumption - Roman empire extended to Britain,France ,Germany, Spain, Balkans and even Italy .
Jews of certainly non-Khazar origin (no Khazars yet) lived in all parts of that empire including those mentioned above. And yet it is not taken into account?
www.fordham.edu...
You can see that laws concerning Jews existed in Europe much before Khazar Kaganate. Thus Jews existed in Europe before Khazar Kaganate.

Just to clarify myself - i do not think that Jew of Khazarian origin is worse/better then Jew of any other origin. Or human being of any other origin. I just can see how this unbased assumption could be used for political/racial issues.
Now i have to remember -ctrl c!!!
Edit:
Almost forgot!!
As for Jesuits and their plans i cannot add much - ZeroKnowledge factor. But if it is a real power player in the big politics - it is definetly not the only one.

[edit on 16-5-2008 by ZeroKnowledge]

I agree...I never really wanted to delve so deeply into ancestrial origins except merely to point out that, in times as ancient as Mesopotamia, there was very little genetic diversity within geopolitical regions.

The most important point I was making is that the original Hebrew version of Judaism are distinctly different from the Jesuits who have falsely claimed Jewish ancestry & social/religious practices...Which goes hand-in-hand with the fact that they did so to misdirect inevitable hostilities towards "different Jews." How many times in history have various European governments & the Church condemned Jesuits in particular (& Jews in general), even when the bulk of the Judaism Jews had nothing to do with the social/political manipulations that were started by the Jesuit Jews?