posted on May, 15 2008 @ 01:53 PM
I always frond these political threads funny. People want desperately t o believe that there would be some fundamental way to characterize the idea
in a light either to speak ill of some party or candidate.
This is not what it appears. First of all the idea of 'extracting' wealth from the American economy to make the U.S. pay it's fair share is
ludicrous considering this is not ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT (yet).
Our fair share is whatever we, as a sovereign nation of free people say it is, no more. There is no measure by which the GLOBAL COMMUNITY can make
such a determination for us, unless we AS A NATION agree to surrender our money (and sovereignty). NOTICE that a 'TAX' based solution eliminates
the RIGHTS of the people to object because, as a tax, it will fall under the fiat control of the IRS (not a federal entity). And the financial
'holding' entity will be the Fed (not a government agency either). We all KNOW how transparent they are.
Also, notice that the TAXES thus collected are not specifically controlled by the US. They are surrendered to an outside, foreign agency for
disposition (the U.N.). Further, since these are TAXES, we are agreeing to establish a de facto precedent that our income is partially to be assessed
and withheld for a beneficiary not of the United States - when did that become part of the Democratic agenda? The fruits of our labor will be further
divided as 'property' of a foreign agency. (Can anyone say "hey Obama, your CFR agenda is showing" ?)
You know, this nations VOLUNTARILY, via public groups, already gives at a very generous level. You'll see no television ads of a guy holding an
Baltimore inner-city child who's dad just got put away in the slammer for eight years for selling pot, saying "This poor guy has no one to take care
of him, we will get him to school, dress him, make sure he has doctor care, and a safe place to live" like you do for the foreign kids. You barely
see the media calling attention to the 60,000 American citizens living in tent-cities outside LA. Nor the Louisiana catastrophe anymore.
I would suggest making the Super Citizen corporations pay the tax. They are the one's killing and exploiting those people on a global scale anyway.
No wait! They'll just be allowed to 'pass the cost' onto us, as always.
By the way, Who get s this money? How long is it held in interest bearing accounts? Who 'earns' the interest? Where does the money get sent and to
whom., exactly? Would it be used as a diplomatic tool? A carrot to make other countries abide by 'larger desires?' What if the country isn't a
subscriber to the Codex? Oops, no aid for your starving and suffering? We want military bases on your land, NO? No aid for you. We want you to
accept the 1.9 million refugees from your enemy next door, NO? Fine - go hungry. Open your borders or starve.
This list of tricks goes on and on. Why give this kind of leverage to the UN in the first place? What more are we expected to surrender? Care to