Who thinks the 2008 elections are rigged? All the signs point to McCain. He's not as talked about in the news as Hillary or Obama, kind of makes me
feel like they're only there to divert our attention while McCain slithers his way into office.
[edit on 14-5-2008 by Quarantine]
|
Personally, I don't think it matters whether the winner turns out to be McCain, Clinton or Obama, the only difference between the three of them is
the amount of sugarcoating their words come with. McCain spews forth a bunch of crap we most people can't bring themselves to swallow. Hillary
spews the same crap, but dips it in chocolate. Obama, again with the same crap, but he coats it in chocolate, puts a cherry on top, then laces it
with nicotine so we ask for more.
Saw someones sig here on ATS that pretty much sums it up...
"If elections worked in the US they'd be illegal" or something to that effect.
|
I can't agree more. No matter who "wins" the election, it's only going to be more of the same. We took out the republicans and put a bunch of
democrats in congress, yet I don't see any change.
|
Seeing as Hillary seems to be content to destroy the democrat party's credibility if it looks like she is going to lose, i'd put my bets on McClane.
|
 Originally posted by Unit541
Personally, I don't think it matters whether the winner turns out to be McCain, Clinton or Obama, the only difference between the three of them is
the amount of sugarcoating their words come with. McCain spews forth a bunch of crap we most people can't bring themselves to swallow. Hillary
spews the same crap, but dips it in chocolate. Obama, again with the same crap, but he coats it in chocolate, puts a cherry on top, then laces it
with nicotine so we ask for more.
Saw someones sig here on ATS that pretty much sums it up...
"If elections worked in the US they'd be illegal" or something to that effect. 
Nicely done, I think we can all agree. Never the less I'll still be interested to see who here actually believes we're going to have a fair
election.
|
