reply to post by kattraxx
Yes, the first thing I did was check maps for Corrego and got the place in Brazil, but that town rings no bells for me. So I'm thinking it wasn't
Corrego exactly but a similar-looking name; or if you like a name with a similar feel or ring to it. There is a Corredo in Panama and although there
was a 5.6 quake in that country on Monday, I don't think that was "it" either... Your own sense of something relating more closely to California is
right -- well, it ties in with my own feelings as well, let me put it that way...
This is part of the "problem". While there are physical indicators that we pick up on, there is this "other" side as well and for me, it's
equally valid. Why, for example, am I so specific about a location in Japan? I could just say "somewhere in Japan" and leave it at that but it's
not what I
feel... Eventually, I suspect that "science" might find some underlying reasons why or how we pick up on such specifics. It could
be, for example, that we see through that rather odd thing called "time" in some fashion. There are a variety of theories on what time really
is...it certainly need not be purely linear. It could be "layered" or even a kind of "singularity", in which everything that has ever or will ever
happen is in fact part of a universal "now". What we normally consider the passage of time, then, is based upon a single perspective, but we may be
able to sense or perceive time in different ways. Hence things like "flash images" -- or perhaps even some of the physical/mental symptoms we
experience...Who knows? Maybe we pick up on "future" feelings of sadness, loss and grief, while also sensing real-time pre-quake energy-changes.
Just my thoughts.

But the main thing is, we are sharing and learning. This has to beneficial in some ways...
[edit on 28-5-2008 by JustMike]