Ron Paul publicly names neoconservatives, page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 39 times


reply posted on 15-5-2008 @ 04:30 PM by mybigunit
reply to post by jsobecky



Essentially isnt that what the government is asking us to do ..die for Isreal I mean you can sugar coat it all you want but fighting Isreals wars is fighting Isreals wars no matter how you look into it and I dont feel we have to their military is quite strong enough to handle that. And as far as the flags being intertwined and stuff like that I try not to look that deep but when you see half of this administration either dual citizens of Isreal and US or directly from Israel you have to say to yourself hmmm is there a link?

www.viewzone.com...



[edit on 15-5-2008 by mybigunit]


reply posted on 15-5-2008 @ 04:47 PM by jsobecky
reply to post by mybigunit



Originally posted by mybigunit
reply to post by jsobecky



Essentially isnt that what the government is asking us to do ..die for Isreal I mean you can sugar coat it all you want but fighting Isreals wars is fighting Isreals wars no matter how you look into it and I dont feel we have to their military is quite strong enough to handle that. And as far as the flags being intertwined and stuff like that I try not to look that deep but when you see half of this administration either dual citizens of Isreal and US or directly from Israel you have to say to yourself hmmm is there a link?

[edit on 15-5-2008 by mybigunit]


I'm afraid we're going to have to agree to disagree. I don't believe our foreign policy can be condensed into a cliche like that. Not to mention Israel's importance as an ally in that part of the world. And I would expect someone of Ron Paul's status to be a little more professional than that. Using those caricatures just seems so - 3rd rate.

Regardless of this video, I had my concerns about him before this. Accepting money from a white supremacist, using the excuse that "Better that I spend it than him", is troubling to me. And the amount donated is irrelevant - until his supporters used it as a defense ( It was only $500 ).


reply posted on 15-5-2008 @ 04:55 PM by skyshow
reply to post by CaptGizmo



While it's true Nanci Polosi and the Democrats recaptured the majority in the House, it's a very slim one. To really get something done that supports the platform a party really needs a 2/3rds majority. Without that majority it's pretty much status quo. Now if the country would have dumped out even more Republicans and delivered one, and nothing changed, then you would have a viable argument that parties don't matter.



reply posted on 15-5-2008 @ 05:15 PM by mybigunit
reply to post by jsobecky



Right it probably wasnt wise to accept money from the likes of David Duke wont disagree there cant disagree there but if you want to go down the slippery slope imagine the people who have donated to the others that isnt public that has done a lot worse like murder or robbing people blind no names to be mentioned so do we search through everyone that donates and give it back...I guess thats for another thread.

But on subject here yeah we will agree to disagree its just a fundamental difference I dont feel we have the money to police the world Im not just talking Israel Im talking South Korea...Germany...hell all the 130 countries we have bases in and lets throw in Saudi Arabia...I just feel being the worlds police has caused us more problems than the good that comes out of it.


Oh and BTW its not a video you should probably click the link and check it out who knows it may open up your mind

[edit on 15-5-2008 by mybigunit]


reply posted on 15-5-2008 @ 05:31 PM by jsobecky
reply to post by mybigunit



Originally posted by mybigunit
Oh and BTW its not a video you should probably click the link and check it out who knows it may open up your mind

[edit on 15-5-2008 by mybigunit]

It's not a video? Now you've totally lost me.

If it's not a video, then what is it??


reply posted on 15-5-2008 @ 05:39 PM by mybigunit
Originally posted by jsobecky
reply to
post by mybigunit



Originally posted by mybigunit
Oh and BTW its not a video you should probably click the link and check it out who knows it may open up your mind

[edit on 15-5-2008 by mybigunit]

It's not a video? Now you've totally lost me.

If it's not a video, then what is it??



Its an article with pictures ....its not a video


reply posted on 15-5-2008 @ 06:06 PM by mybigunit
reply to post by Freenrgy2



Ummm Im not sure who you are busting on me or her make yourself clear so if its me I can defend myself

Nevermind I got confused sorry energy.

BTW Becky I was talking about this link here
www.viewzone.com...

Not the Op video sorry I now see what you mean.

[edit on 15-5-2008 by mybigunit]

[edit on 15-5-2008 by mybigunit]



reply posted on 15-5-2008 @ 09:35 PM by daddyroo45
reply to post by KMFNWO
[more
You have said exactly what everyone needs to hear.You never lose your vote when you vote your true choice.We have been led into pascivity and taught that you can only vote for one party or the other."Choose the lesser of two evils"as it were

I will not lose my vote.I will write in Ron Paul for President.He is our last best hope for this country people.Every vote cast for Dr.Paul will shake the foundations of The Powers That Be.They will know that there are at least that number of people aware of the scam they are pulling over on the American people.

Do your country a favor,do yourself a favor and write in Ron Paul for President


reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 01:14 AM by angst18
Originally posted by jsobecky

I won't address your assessment of Israel's origins in the current geopolitical arena, but I will say that *I* was the one who questioned RP's bias. I have reasons:

In the video there is a caricature of Uncle Sam entwined, lock-style, in a Star of David. It is held together by a "Master Lock" - nice choice, eh?

Another shot...Condi talking to Netanyahu, with Israeli and American flags in the background.

When RP begins to describe what, in his opinion, are neocon views, there is a Star of David as a backdrop.

View #3 is a knockoff of a recruiting poster of Uncle Sam pointing out at us, and the caption reads

I WANT YOU
TO DIE FOR ISRAEL


There's probably more.

Am I reading too much into this? I don't think so.


First off, I don't think it's at all inappropriate to address any assessment of Israel's origin (even though I didn't make one) in the "geopolitical arena", just in this post since it wouldn't be on topic.

Second, others have already pointed out that the images on the clip weren't Paul's. Only the speech. Who knows who put the sound and audio together.

Third, what's wrong with using a country's flag to decry the country? The Star of David is on Israel's flag. If one wanted to draw any artistic rendering or artistic satire of the interaction of two countries, why wouldn't you use the flag or iconography of said country(s) to do so?

Though, yeah, I agree that the whole Uncle Sam in the Star of David was messed up - mainly because I think it was meant to bring up that whole "the Jews crucified Christ" thing that's been done to death (no pun intended).

Seriously, I really don't care if someone is Jewish, I don't really even understand why it even matters anymore. For the last 60 yrs. you've been able to "convert" to Judaism - totally against the matriarchal orthodoxy by the way - so by now it's kind of moot, anyone can be Jewish. Big deal. Most of us are to some extent or in some percentage anyway if we're taking into consideration both paternal and maternal lineage.

Synopsis - Paul didn't put together the iconography of the clip that was linked to by the OP. Though I don't think I would be wrong in my feeling that he doesn't believe it's worth the international implications to support what I, at least, consider to be an illegal occupation.

You can be Anti-Israel without being Anti-Jewish.



reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 07:07 AM by dariousg
reply to post by KMFNWO




I agree 100%. I have lived through 5 elections. My candidate won 3 of them. I will sadly admit that the last name of each of those 3 candidates is much like that of a shrub. It's pathetic that I voted mainly based on my affiliation as a republican instead of based on good knowledge.

I will also be voting for the likely loser of this election. No, not McCain. I will be voting for the real change. For Ron Paul.


reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 07:18 AM by mybigunit
Originally posted by dariousg
reply to
post by KMFNWO




I agree 100%. I have lived through 5 elections. My candidate won 3 of them. I will sadly admit that the last name of each of those 3 candidates is much like that of a shrub. It's pathetic that I voted mainly based on my affiliation as a republican instead of based on good knowledge.

I will also be voting for the likely loser of this election. No, not McCain. I will be voting for the real change. For Ron Paul.


YOU PUT US IN THIS POSITION!!!!!! J/K We all make mistakes but its good when you learn from them...Im voting RP also whether I have to write him in or not.
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 68 replies