What about Russia's Stealth?!?! What about the others?!?!, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 11-12-2004 @ 11:08 PM by Dima
yes it does, it shot downa B-2A bomber in Yugoslavia, let me try to find that site again

what do u mean the SAM system would be destroyed already, don't tell me that you think a missile on the F-22, specifically the AMRAAM has a longer range than the missiles on the S-400, let me provide u wit some info

here's the site with the B-2A Spirit bomber crashing

www.aeronautics.ru...

its number 370 and was shot down at 19: 50 or 7: 50

missilethreat.com...

this site gives some info on the S-400 syetm, although very little because very little of its capabilites are known, but it will icnoporate some of the missiles used in the S-300P version, it will utilize the 9m96 missile, only for s short while, it has a range of 120 km, in 2 years, Fakel Machine Building Design Bureau, the missile will have an advanced seeker and will be able track targets well beyond the horizon line, it will have a range of 400 km, which is 2.5 times better than the S-300P and twice the range of the newest american SAM the PAC-3, the longest missile that the F-22 will utilize, if i'm not mistaken will be the AMRAAM, there are several versions, but all of them have a range in between 50km and 70 km, far shorter than that of the S-300P even, and the extended range upgrade won't happen for a long time, and even then, it won't be even close to the S-400, and at best will be slightly better than the S-300P

www.designation-systems.net...

wait, sry an F-22 will use a JDAM instead against a SAM system, here's the range of the GBU-31 Joint Direct Attack Munition, it has a range of 24 km

www.danshistory.com...


reply posted on 12-12-2004 @ 12:28 AM by Disturbed Deliverer
No B-2 was shot down during Kosovo. Your source is spouting nonsense. If this happened, why aren't there pictures? There is no way America could have hid a crash like that. The Serbs would have been bragging.

I don't trust too many Russian sites. The motives for lying are obvious. I've seen it in the past, such as when the Iraq war started and certain Russian news sites were reporting massive casualties.

what do u mean the SAM system would be destroyed already, don't tell me that you think a missile on the F-22, specifically the AMRAAM has a longer range than the missiles on the S-400, let me provide u wit some info


The F-22 is not designed for the same role as a B-2 or F-117. It's a fighter first. It's not going to be heading into thick defenses like your suggesting. The best SAM's would be targeted by cruise missiles. B-2's would follow up.

this site gives some info on the S-400 syetm, although very little because very little of its capabilites are known, but it will icnoporate some of the missiles used in the S-300P version, it will utilize the 9m96 missile, only for s short while, it has a range of 120 km, in 2 years, Fakel Machine Building Design Bureau, the missile will have an advanced seeker and will be able track targets well beyond the horizon line, it will have a range of 400 km, which is 2.5 times better than the S-300P and twice the range of the newest american SAM the PAC-3, the longest missile that the F-22 will utilize, if i'm not mistaken will be the AMRAAM, there are several versions, but all of them have a range in between 50km and 70 km, far shorter than that of the S-300P even, and the extended range upgrade won't happen for a long time, and even then, it won't be even close to the S-400, and at best will be slightly better than the S-300P


I know all about the missiles. I'm more curious about the radar. How exactly does it detect a stealth plane? There are only two techniques I've seen. One is PCL, which no one has developed to date. The other is low frequency waves which I doubt are very effective at this point.



reply posted on 12-12-2004 @ 07:58 PM by Laxpla
Originally posted by Dima
are u kidding me, lol, hahaha, the S-400 will destroy the F-22 before it knows it, because when a SAM system targest the aircraft, there is no way that the aircraft will have any warning, the F-22 will probably beat the S-300 but definitely not the S-400

the first lnik that u provided us with, it shows how the F-22 and B-2's will use each otehr to sweep everything away, well, the story is told as if the oppposing country is doing nothing whatsoever, AT ALL, its a laughable story, although will work against Afghanistan again, and...............African countries, but against countries like Russia and the countries in Europe, no, no chance

well, we have two contradicitng statements, one that states that the F-22 is designed so that it will not be detected by the S-400, yet the S-400 articles state that it was designed as a mutlirole SAM system unlike the others and will be able to track stealthy planes as well as cruise missiles, and ICBM's from 400 km away and fire at them

these statements are contradictory, but, the F-22 isn't invisible, other aircraft can track it, its not like there's no signal at all, i read somewhere, i think it might have been on a forum that the B-2 has the RCS of a bumblebee and the F-22 has an RCS of a tricycle, that is very small, yet is still detectable, thats what i don't get, u think stealth and u think invisibility, but its simply NOT true


Where in my posts have I stated that stealth in invisible? It isn't, your right, but dam close. The F-15 with the most updated radar couldn't see it until it was right on top of it.

I just stated 2 sources and 2 links. There are many more, if you want, I can get you all that I can find, I am estimating around 20-30 if you want me to from reliable sites.

The S-400/S-20 is a very good SAM, but protects against lower level airforces. With the new chemical/solid state lasers deployed, Sams wouldn't be a worry.



Here is a article from the Raptor Team Website:




This aircraft combines stealth design with the supersonic, highly maneuverable, dual-engine, long-range requirements of an air-to-air fighter and will have an inherent air-to-ground capability. The F/A-22’s integrated avionics gives it first-look, first-shot, first-kill capability that will guarantee U.S. air dominance for the next 40 years.




The air threat to the United States in the year 2005 and beyond is real.

Current Russian fighters are already on par with America’s best fighter, the F-15. Europe's and Russia's newest class of fighters will surpass the F-15; they are set to roll off production lines by 2005

At least three foreign aircraft threaten to surpass the F-15’s performance in the near future: the French Rafale, the Eurofighter 2000 and the Russian Su-35. Some foreign aircraft are already at parity with the F-15

Nations are already denying America access to airspace around the globe by obtaining low-cost, but sophisticated, surface-to-air missile systems

Highly capable surface-to-air missile (SAM) systems pose a formidable challenge to the F-15’s survivability. Advanced SAM systems, because of their relatively low cost, are a quick and easy way for countries to modernize their air defense systems

Estimated twenty-one countries will possess the most advanced systems by 2005



Link




Any way you put it, Raptor, UCAV, and UAV are bypassing the S-400.


reply posted on 12-12-2004 @ 09:59 PM by Dima
disturbed deliverer, u're foolsih, of course they've tested the SAM system, then they wouldn't start purchasing them next year if it wasn't tested, the S-300 tracked an F-117 in Yugoslavia , and the S-300 is older than the F-117, it wasn't even created to counter stealth, yet it still did!

about the F-22, i heard that it had the RCS of a tricycle from someone here at ATS, the S-400 has detecting stealth in mind

here are some links on the S-400 and it has been tested

www.cndyorks.gn.apc.org...
www.wonderland.org.nz...

the second one nearly to the end gives some info no the S-400 and the S-400 mentions that the SAM can lock onto targets without giving a signal

www.fas.org...
www.astronautix.com...
www.missilethreat.com...
warfare.ru...

the russians are also devloping a new type of radar that scans the desnity of the air, if the density is higher than the expected density of the air, then they immediately know to scramble their interceptors

and since they first developed the passive array radar, they have a lead in that technology


reply posted on 12-12-2004 @ 10:44 PM by Disturbed Deliverer
disturbed deliverer, u're foolsih, of course they've tested the SAM system, then they wouldn't start purchasing them next year if it wasn't tested, the S-300 tracked an F-117 in Yugoslavia , and the S-300 is older than the F-117, it wasn't even created to counter stealth, yet it still did!


The F-117 was never tracked. If it was capable to do that, it would have done so the past few nights when the F-117 used the same path and bombed them (not to mention the other F-117's used to bomb the country)...

The F-117 had a number of reasons it was less stealthy that night, and they still had to light the entire sky up to shoot it down, and that was after it dropped its payload.

As for testing, the Russians don't have any stealth planes to test it on. They don't know how it fairs against a B-2, or F-22, or F-117, or any of America's stealth planes.

first look, first shot first kill will insure air dominance for the next 40 years, it refers to A2A, an F-22 would get slaughtered by an S-400, and lasers aren't coming out for a long time(not like 400 years, but like 10-15 years)


America may very well have lasers equipped on different vehicles, even planes, within 10 years.

that F-15 excercise, everyone has heard me say this over and over and everyone is getting tired of it, but, i have to say it because every country does this, PROPAGANDA, that excercise was propaganda


It's easy to say this, but there's no real proof.

Just by looking at how the F-22 fights, it's entirely possible the F-22 could take out more then 5 F-15's. It has the most advanced avionics and radar of any plane in existance, it has long range, very accurate missiles that allow it to fire without giving up position, supercruise to move out of range even after firing, and obviously stealth.

This thing would be almost unstoppable in BVR combat against fourth generation fighters.

in the future, i really won't be worried about america, the F-22 will probably the last "innovative" aircraft that america will create because the way the american economy is going, u guys will be barely be able to maintain your country in the future, i have tons of to support this, disobediance=death


Our economy grows at the highest pace of any developed nation. We have low unemployment. We have a GDP twice the size of the nearest competition, and they have an economy mulitple times the size of our own.

The American economy is just fine.


reply posted on 13-12-2004 @ 02:13 PM by Laxpla
Originally posted by Dima
first look, first shot first kill will insure air dominance for the next 40 years, it refers to A2A, an F-22 would get slaughtered by an S-400, and lasers aren't coming out for a long time(not like 400 years, but like 10-15 years)

wow, i'm surprised in the summer when i wasn't registered u were a really flamey guy, but now u seem so calm

that F-15 excercise, everyone has heard me say this over and over and everyone is getting tired of it, but, i have to say it because every country does this, PROPAGANDA, that excercise was propaganda

don't get me wrong, the russian govrenment, every government uses propaganda

in the future, i really won't be worried about america, the F-22 will probably the last "innovative" aircraft that america will create because the way the american economy is going, u guys will be barely be able to maintain your country in the future, i have tons of # to support this, disobediance=death


You have any proof or sources saying that the S-400 will slaughter the Raptor? I showed sources of the Raptor able to defeat the S-400.

Anyway, the Raptor will not be going to be attacking the S-400 in the first attack, it will be the UCAV. The UCAV are able to bypass the S-400 and leave paths for the Raptors to take out the air vehicles and the bombers to wreck. As I showed sources in previous posts.

Yes, I am a calm guy now, knowing that arguing with Cold War adversaries which made me learn a lesson that they are in denial. Considering your in 10th grade is another reason too.

Actually, the F-15's had the most current radar, but the Indian pilots got the shot off first because of their missle. That's the need for the F-22.

Well, anger creates problems, if you are angered, please share you thoughts. America's economy is just fine, I'm proud to live here.




[edit on 13-12-2004 by Laxpla]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



In Case Of Videos Of Flying People
  Posted 9 days ago with 9 member flags
Lockheed and Boeing may have seen my design
  Posted 19 days ago with 9 member flags
First flight for \'flapless\' plane - the Evolution of Aviation
  Posted 12 days ago with 4 member flags
Boeing X-37 and X-40 - the ultimate history
  Posted 5 days ago with 3 member flags
F22 mishap or more that meeets the eye?
  Posted 1 days ago with 3 member flags
Its a bird, its a plane, no its a ....
  Posted 14 days ago with 0 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Alien Grey caught in photo ?
  Aliens and UFOs, Posted 7 hours ago, 57 replies
Pass Me My Rifle
  World War Three, Posted 11 hours ago, 54 replies
Santorum wants more fracking!!!
  US Political Madness, Posted 16 hours ago, 53 replies