reply to post by jimmyjackblack
Disclaimer: I'm a theist but not of the Abrahamic faiths. I have minor biblical scholar and scriptural skills. Also I am not a scientific/legal or
medical expert in any field. Beware of my Contagious Memes! & watch out that you don't get cut on my Occams razor.All of this is my personal
conjecture and should not be considered the absolute or most definitive state of things as they really are. Use this information at your own risk! I
accept no liability if your ideology comes crashing down around you with accompanying consequences!
I have had major computer problems for the past month and have be offline since my last post over a month ago. I apologize unreservedly for any
inconvenience it has caused anybody.
jimmyjackblack I also apologize unreservedly directly to you for my extremely late reply and I hope you to can forgive me for this transgression and
yes I humbly accept your apology. I also understand that you may not veiw this thread again but I feel I must refute a few points you brought up.
Explanation: I posted and I quote "2ndly thanks for the explanation for it raises some points I would love to debate. For example A) GODS The Editor
in Chief of his Book and is responsible for its upkeep. He also owns copyright and this should ensure the veracity of its truth. so why would he let
the word "rah/ra" be translated as "evil" (clearly a moral concept) instead of "natural disaster"
And you replied and I quote "Lol, you can't be serious right? We're talking about Ancient Text, not Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings or Steven Kings
works. We're talking about people who are writing about God, God Himself did not right anything at all in the Bible, people who experienced God wrote
about what they had experienced. Some things like the book of Genesis are
stories about how the earth came into existance, something God probably told people. You should read the Book of Enoch or 1Enoch, it's pretty
interesting to say the least."
And my refute. Look IMO its either the profound word of GOD dictated by YHVH and 100% accurate OR its the highly fallible word of imperfect men and is
therefor NOT 100% accurate. I suggest that if the Bible is fallible its followers are misguided to the extent of those fallibilities!
2ndly I posted and I quote "and B) it isn't obvious at all in my opinion and could mean either or both. Next is C) if you look it talks about
opposites (light and dark) and I suggest war is the opposite of peace and this again goes to his morality!"
And you replied and again I quote "On the contrary, peace is not always the opposite of war, if you look you see that there is no other moral
mentions in the text. The Oposite of peace can be, calamity, chaos, noise, strife and many others that I can't think of, peace is not specific to
morality, that is an American language judgment and you must understand these text are not written in english, but in Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek,
Chaldean, different words mean different things to these ancient peoples and only by looking in other text can we come up with a proper gage of
inference to understand them some times, I research many ancient text to learn, not just about spiritual matters, but many things, so when I read
something I look all around the text to find a good inference gage."
And my response. I agree that the opposite of peace is more than just war ( a rose by any other name is but just as sweet!) and yes I do understand
that these texts have been Translated but I do feel translations try to convey as much of the original meaning as possible regardless of cultural or
time differences and again GOD's hand should ( WAS ie Omnipresence and
Omniscience) of been present when these translations were occuring and could easily of influenced them appropriately(Omnipotence).
continued next post >