reply to post by whitesatan
Are you seriously gonna tell me that you don't contradict yourself? I told you that you would twist my words around and here we go...
I said:
and the earth was without form... this is because of the cosmic battle that Satan and God had with each other. Satan destroyed the earth and all life
on it, explaining the extinction of dinosaurs, then God renewed the earth with new life on it along with the creation of man.
You said:
Dinosaurs died because the world froze over. The Earth was never blown up. You are pretty stuupid if You say the world was blown up because I just
looked outside and the world was there.
Now lets analyze this twisting of words. I said that Satan destroyed the earth, not blow it up. Destroying the earth does not necessarily mean that
the entire globe had to be decimated into oblivion... it simply means that the earth's life and eco-system were destroyed. Also you might want to
check your facts about the dinosaurs because science already mentions the fact that a comet destroyed them. Ice killed off the mammals that preceeded
the dinos like the mammoth and sabertooth tiger. A comet... which sounds like it came from the cosmos of the universe. A comet can destroy life on
earth, but not blow it up.
so you twisted what I said... I said "destroyed" not "Blown up". So you did indeed twist my words. Wait, I have more.
You decided to quote me to make me look bad only you didn't finish the quote I said.
You reposted my partial quote here:
"I don't know what I'm talking about"
Yet my full quote read:
"I'm sure you'll twist your own words around to make it seem like I don't know what I'm talking about"
So in all fairness, I'll do the exact same thing to you and let you choke on it. Whitesatan said:
"The Big Bang doesn't disprove God's existence"
I'm sorry but I'm not the one on the floor crying. This is one of many times that me or another person on this thread caught you lieing or
contradicting yourself. You did twist my words around and/or left parts of my quote out to make it look worse than it did. That is a childish trick
on here and only proves further that you're a troll trying to keep a thread going for the sake of entertainment of argument and ats/bts points.
I'll play along though because I will find nothing but contradictions in your posts due to your mild comprehension of the bible and history. I saw
you define "inferred" and it looks like you googled it at webster.com and copied and pasted it. Anyone at a computer could do that and the language
and grammar of the definition did not match up with your horrible grammar and spelling in your posts. Your trickery only works on the feeble-minded
audience and believe me, you're a lone wolf in this thread. Why haven't your athiest buddies come to your aid? Because they know the way you're
arguing is stupid and makes no sense.
.....and now it's time to hear some more contradictions from whitesatan....
On a side note, someone mentioned the name "Lucifer" was not evil. Indeed you are right because Lucifer was Satan's name while he was still an
angel. Fallen angels are demons and Lucifer's demon name is Satan. Either way, we are talking about the same evil spirit.





