|
|
Topic started on 12-5-2008 @ 01:47 AM by jhill76
|
          
Earthquake of a magnitude 7.8 reported in China
 BEIJING (Reuters) - An earthquake with a magnitude of 7.8 struck China's Sichuan province on Monday, less than 100 km (60 miles) from the
provincial capital of Chengdu, the U.S. Geological Survey said on its Web site.
The tremor, centered 92 km northwest of Chengdu, was felt as far away as Beijing and Shanghai, where office buildings swayed with the
impact. (visit the link for the full news article)
[edit on 12-5-2008 by jhill76]
[edit on 13-5-2008 by asala]
[edit on 15/5/2008 by khunmoon]
|
copyright & usage
|
Click here for more Breaking Alternative News topics
Hot Topics
|
Top Topics
|
This Week
|
Subscribe
|
Home
|
reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 01:47 AM by jhill76
|
If anyone else has sources on this, please list.
(visit the link for the full news article)
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 01:49 AM by interestedalways
|
Could you repost the link? I don't see it.
That is a mighty big quake, my goodness.
Waiting for more info.
Thanks for the heads up!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 01:52 AM by jhill76
|
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 01:52 AM by itisibrian
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 02:09 AM by ats1629
|
Mianyang covers an area of over 20,000 km² and has a population of 5.2 million, with 600,000 people in the city proper.
Wikipedia
More Info
That alot of people and a big quake.. We dont need anymore natural disasters going on!!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 02:12 AM by ats1629
|
Its even closer to Chengdu... 55 miles...
Population
- Total 11,000,670
- Density 887.9/km² (2,299.6/sq mi)
Wikipedia
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 02:14 AM by yankeerose
|
Earthquake M7.8 occured near the Chengdu city, Sichuan province, China on 12.05.2008 at 06:28:04 (UTC), local time 15:28:04 at epicenter. Population
in 100 km radius: more 4 million peoples.)
RSOE EDIS - Emergency Disaster Link:
hisz.rsoe.hu...
hisz.rsoe.hu...
Chinese News Link:
english.people.com.cn...
[edit on 12-5-2008 by yankeerose]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 02:16 AM by Karlhungis
|
  
Do we think that damage and casualty reports will be accurate? Or will they be controlled by the Chinese Govt especially in light of the upcoming
Olympic games?
Earthquakes, Virus's and Protests... OH MY! They are having a rough build up to the games.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 02:21 AM by ats1629
|
Here is a link of a simlar sized 7.8 earthquake in China.. Granted it was in a different area it killed 230,000 people..(some say 2-3 times as many) I
hope building structures are better in these other areas or the death toll could be terrible..
Tangshan: The Deadliest Earthquake
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 02:23 AM by Acidtastic
|
Jeebus,that's a big'un.
hope there's minimal casualties ect. What is it with all the big natural stuff going on at the moment?
[edit on 12/5/2008 by Acidtastic]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 02:33 AM by LDragonFire
|
Yes there does seem to be a upswing in the devastation brought on by natural disasters I wrote this thread here
The End is Here! that shows clear evidence that in the last 30 years each decade that
goes by we are seeing more deaths due to Earthquakes, that thread isn't finished yet I would like to add cyclone/hurricanes/floods and other natural
disasters to it.
Seeing that this big quake was within 100 miles of at least two major population centers, I would assume there will be a large death toll, and massive
property damage.
[edit on 12-5-2008 by LDragonFire]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 02:35 AM by Britguy
|
I have been in contact with a colleague in Hong Kong and he's had no report of damage to our office or casualties in Chengdu so far. I've also
checked network connections to the site and it's all still up... which is a good sign.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 02:35 AM by Sublime620
|

Did China help us after Katrina?
Just wondering what the odds of us working together with them are if this does turn out to be deadly?
It would be a sign of good faith if these two mega-countries could do something positive together.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 02:48 AM by _Del_
|
Chengdu is a pretty large city. Epicenter was roughly as far away from Chengdu as the epicenter of the 1989 quake that damaged San Francisco, but the
magnitude is rather more intense. Let's see if it gets revised up or down in the next little while.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 02:55 AM by _Del_
|
Originally posted by Sublime620
Did China help us after Katrina?
Just wondering what the odds of us working together with them are if this does turn out to be deadly?
It would be a sign of good faith if these two mega-countries could do something positive together.
I don't know why we wouldn't. It's pretty common; I think China sent army surplus tents to the US for some reason (my memory fades).
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 02:58 AM by Vitchilo
|

There was a lot of people that predicted a big earthquake in southern China... but they were predicting it for June... well.
There's not more ``natural`` disasters than before... it's just that some of them are engineered. Sorry but weather weapons exists, so why not
satellite induced earthquake weapons? Or something else that we don't know about? Black technology... I mean there's a lot of black technology we
don't know about, it's possible.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 02:59 AM by Britguy
|
I'm currently connected to my two CCTV servers at our Chengdu office and all seems to be ok there. No signs of any damage and staff are still at the
office.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 03:02 AM by _Del_
|
reply to post by Britguy
Good to know!
Maybe this will be revised downward?
Edit: Two after shocks -- first at 6.0, the second at 5.4.
[edit on 12-5-2008 by _Del_]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 03:06 AM by jpm1602
|

Scalar tectonics. Weather manipulation. Pick your poison.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |